![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/71d8bf1aa43d8a3d50564475369f935c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
15 May
2014
15 May
'14
6:55 p.m.
Rob Evans wrote:
Hi,
my point of view as a DB-Co-chair (at the moment) is that we don't need a formal policy, if the problem is well understood, we do have a sound proposal how to move forward and there is no severe impact on daily operations for the users of the DB services; (and no substantial disagreement).
For those who weren't present in the routing working group this afternoon, either physically or virtually, there was a strong sentiment that the RIPE NCC should *not* edit other objects to remove references to reclaimed ASNs.
Send out warnings, by all means, but editing other objects would open up a can of worms that is best left sealed under pressure.
Thanks for this feedback, noted! Wilfried.
Cheers, Rob