25 May
2010
25 May
'10
4:36 p.m.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:20:22PM +0100, Jamie Stallwood wrote:
In terms of router processing efficiency are there specific prefix lengths that are "better" health-wise, e.g. should we encourage routes on 4/8/16-bit boundaries?
Surely not. I can remember lingo in the IPv6 spec that specifically advised vendors to NOT make any assumptions about specific prefix lengths and base performance optimizations on those. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0