who signs as-set:?
If the as-set has a hierarchical name (as described in RFC 2725 and possibly elsewhere) then the signer would be the AS holder of the AS named in the hierarchical name form, wouldn't it?
nice theory. not reality.
how does maintainer map to anything in rpki?
I would've thought, after looking through the RFCs that explored this topic back in 1999 - 2000, that the maintainer of a inetnum object would be the address holder, the maintainer of the aut-num object would be the as number holder, and the maintainer of the route object would be the address holder, which would map back into the RPKI
except the reality of irr use does not always match that.
What classes of IRR objects could be generated using the approach of generating IRR objects from RPKI data?
route:
I'm still wondering if that is a sufficient subset of the IRR information set.
i'll take 80% of the gain for NONE of the pain, which is what ruediger's proposal provides. for those using the irr to generate filters, not changing tools is critical. we know how non-maintained irrd and ratoolset are, and we know how much it will cost us to touch our custom tools. ruediger's brilliant hack eliminates all those concerns. randy