On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Btw, if you postponed the 'experiment', how come I did pick up this one:
84.205.73.0/24 12654 12654 {1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221}
That path was announced during the window of notice we had given for the announcements. However, you will notice that that was not the complete set of announcements we intended to make, which included 25-, 50-, 75-. and 100-element AS-sets.
By the way, accoording to your annoucement: | The prefixes involved will be 84.205.73.0/24 and 84.205.89.0/24, both | orignating in AS12654. The AS-sets will consist of AS12654 repeated n | times, thus the paths will look like 12654 {12654, 12654, ..., 12654}. | No other AS numbers will be used. The values of n we will use are 25, | 50, 75 and 100. What's the '1221' doing there ? Grtx, MarcoH