You're right, we could improve the quality (valids/total announcements for the region) with a few emails.

And we had it in mind when we introduced “Alert configuration” to the RPKI dashboard. See img below.

Now I’m thinking if this feature has already provided what it was able to and if we should take a more proactive approach.

Would you be open to reach out to your affected members to inform them about
their affected IP prefixes?

I cannot answer it now. I want to hear more from the WG.

But, without a doubt, your article provides food for thought.

On 15 Sep 2018, at 15:17, nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net> wrote:

Hi,

we made an analysis of the RPKI INVALIDs and broke them down by
* RIR
* INVALID reason
* causing ROA
* number of members each RIR would have to contact to fix them
after filtering them to those prefixes that actually would become unreachable in
an ROV environment.

https://medium.com/@nusenu/towards-cleaning-up-rpki-invalids-d69b03ab8a8c

Looking forward to comments from the WG and RIPE NCC.

The central question in the direction of RIPE NCC is:

Would you be open to reach out to your affected members to inform them about
their affected IP prefixes? (as has been suggested by Job Snijders before)

kind regards,
nusenu

--
https://twitter.com/nusenu_
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu