13 Sep
2004
13 Sep
'04
7:40 a.m.
* Jon Lawrence:
Without doubt, the pools must be bigger than /24 in order for .0 or .255 to be used as host addresses. Never tried it personally, but I can see no reason why .0.255 or .1.0 wouldn't be usable in a .0.0/23 - obviously assuming that you pass /23 to the hosts as a netmask.
Some sites filter .0 and .255, but I don't see why one should support such misconfiguration. ISPs with large dial-up ranges certainly assign .0 and .255 addresses to customers.