-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/08/14 12:51, Job Snijders wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:38:17PM +0200, Emile Aben wrote:
I'd like to inform you of an experiment we propose doing together with ARIN about the routability of prefixes longer than /24 out of ARINs 23.128.0.0/10 block. For more details see ARIN's announcement below.
If people have any feedback on this, please let us know.
I recommend testing with and without proper route: objects for the small prefixes.
As a service provider I would accept smaller than /24... If and only if there is an exact route object for the prefix, other providers just discard anything smaller than a /24, regardless of the existance of proper route objects. Would be good to quantify this.
We plan to start announcing a couple of prefixes from AS12654 within the next hour for the purpose of reachability checking of prefixes longer than /24 out of ARINs 23.128.0.0/10 block: With route object: prefix pingable IP 23.128.24.0/24 23.128.24.1 23.128.25.0/25 23.128.25.1 23.128.25.240/28 23.128.25.241 Without route object: prefix pingable IP 23.128.124.0/24 23.128.124.1 23.128.125.0/25 23.128.125.1 23.128.125.240/28 23.128.125.241 best regards, Emile Aben RIPE NCC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJULRhIAAoJEKxthF6wloMOuR4QAJys9r18hwmu8DsF2nr6mCje wjYoKcJP/AAl0vQpQLMhR70D9b9v5XQArcMyvzoXRqcFYTfz5yAy9rsOD1pWOE8r dz/XmTzp45fmTRBMbCgQNVA4FLhv0Iq9Qx2eVSWhgLGSTNRNM9oGUTOVvzaIZ551 hx0+dbexz6AO9LlHeeam+rulHsIrsXXeMHhuLz1yU/MkW+MEyadJPQqLpMjIvCBs 4ENPDe358J4SQVMi7Ur55mXaF8vCJ4lP9CXCzcSvEa+S+iuoN9+xrDC6+QPHPj8k 1ZWiSN903ESQBcTG+uX69GH0qHCD/ADYswL705GEayRhXh0VlCdUwkfBCZdYKRn/ KB5hvJ+xkXIA+2mlBJYuJDWs3WB9xZ4ijID6hEbyqfiX1TqNQy0qPPS5HWrkeZg6 UCVBDFvZnn39z7BOSNLvf3bSc1VWK2AikS+6pzyyd8i4Pdk7GVPxFnsHdfEwkRJz n7h0Vjn7MOrnS6Fy29dJ1E+HC3PlN+W1hE9j4vO3sGrKHEc9tIW9MZ8Wg35qKi5c oUp9wylYhkjl3YKHxtc4bUXwzQqdYa7sxXPKIX5yfYLa+0mIdnQgWqK2Rzd+/rAa JfNPCrgJkxUrd8Gut6OkaV5EhgojYfvrGe3qfZj9OvhG4SQcDjbTW24rdySjtMJS mADNKNND94MRp43ehre3 =bh0Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----