Dear Job, all,

Op 20 sep. 2021, om 15:37 heeft Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> het volgende geschreven:

Dear Nathalie, group,

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Nathalie Trenaman wrote:
Please be aware that the roadmap you mentioned just shows the roadmap
for the current quarter and not for a longer period.

Ah, thank you for the clarification.

Are there any other items that predate the existence of the "Community
Input on Planning" table on [1]?

No, not formally at least. In the past I received some feature requests to my direct e-mail address. Some from individual community members, some through different fora. 
This is why we decided to go for a more transparent framework. Also, because it was hard to read the demand for these features. 
To give the WG some examples from the last 12 months:

-Route object integration in the RPKI Dashboard of my.ripe.net (similar as APNIC) [2]
-Mandatory 2FA for the RPKI Dashboard
-API session timeouts

It would be good, in a separate thread maybe, to discuss if the working group sees these features as useful.


As some RPKI projects are multi-quarter or even multi-year projects,
it might be good to expand the community's visibility into the list of
RPKI-related work items which RIPE NCC to some degree has accepted, but
not yet scheduled.

At RIPE82, I published the rough time lines for the work in 2021 on slide 12 and 13. [3] As you can see, the quarterly roadmap follows this time line (approximately). I intend to do the same for 2022 as soon as the budget and activity plan are approved. 


Kind regards,

Job

[1]: https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/rpki/rpki-planning-and-roadmap

Kind regards,

Nathalie Trenaman
RIPE NCC


[2] https://www.apnic.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/route-roa-management-guide.pdf (PDF)
[3] https://ripe82.ripe.net/presentations/81-Routing-WG-RIPE82-Nathalie.pdf (PDF)