30 May
1995
30 May
'95
10:25 p.m.
In message <199505301824.OAA13182@lovefm.reston.mci.net>, Tony Bates writes:
A comment if I may even though I wasn't in Rome ;-).
Willem van der Scheun <Willem.vanderScheun@sara.nl> writes: * * - Importance of ripe-181 acknowledged as document has become rfcxxxx * standards track document. * Ripe-181 has become an RFC (RFC1786) *but* is not on Standards Track. It is purely an Informational RFC only.
--Tony.
It really needs to be a standards track document. It doesn't stand alone without some of the other RIPE documents. It also needs updating since we've all found a need for minor extensions. I thought this would be the main thrust of the RPS WG and was very disappointed to hear the chair(s) pushing RPSL. Curtis