I don't think is the same, because some people may read it as "the NCC" is forcing us to do some routing thing, which is not the case. El 23/2/20 14:46, "routing-wg en nombre de Nick Hilliard" <routing-wg-bounces@ripe.net en nombre de nick@foobar.org> escribió: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg wrote on 23/02/2020 13:06: > I don't think is objective to say that the proposal as asking the NCC > to "inject" invalids. > > The proposal is providing the information of the invalids (in this > case unallocated/unassigned) by means of RPKI. Jordi, You're splitting hairs here. The end result is the same. Nick ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.