- routing-wg - mailman.ripe.net

Draft Transition document
by Tony Bates 08 Sep '94

08 Sep '94

Find below the draft of the promised transtition document to incorporate all the proposed features of the new database. This is also available as ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/drafts/db-trans.{txt,ps} We will bring copies of this document to the RIPE as we are so late in getting it out (we will not be doing this for other documents so please take note). Regards and see you in Lisbon, --Tony. RIPE Database Transition Plan DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Tony Bates Daniel Karrenberg Marten Terpstra Document-ID: ripe-1nn August, 1994 ABSTRACT This paper details a transition plan of the changes needed to move from the current RIPE Database to a RIPE Database that supports classless IP network numbers, authorisation of updates and changes to Routing Registry information. 1. Introduction The RIPE database is about to undergo some major changes. These changes come from a set of documents produced by various RIPE work- ing groups and the RIPE NCC. There are three major changes to the RIPE database that will affect the database in such a way, that a description of the changes and a clear transition plan is needed. These three changes are: o Support for Classless Internet Addresses [1]. o Authorisation and Notification of Changes [2]. o Representation of IP Routing Policies in a Routing Registry [3]. All these three new features of the RIPE database will affect the working of the RIPE Database, from simple things like altered out- put, to more complex things like guarded attributes and objects [4]. The three changes will be dealt with in turn in this document. If you wish to get a quick overview of how this affects you please refer to Section 5. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 2 - Each of the sections will have points in time attached to them, at which time a certain change will take effect. These points in time are labeled T1 and T2. For some changes that need to be made, a cer- tain "flag day" is needed. On these days some changes will take place that are not backward compatible and must be performed in a "big bang" type of change. These dates are labeled B1 and B2. All changes will be labeled with a Tn and/or a Bn. Table 1 shows the current time estimates for each of these changes. +---------+----------+------+ | Date | Big Bang | Time | +---------+----------+------+ | Now | | T0 | |15-10-94 | B1 | T1 | | 1-12-94 | B2 | T2 | +---------+----------+------+ Table 1: Timescales for transition changes In the sections describing a change, there will be a small section shortly describing the effect this will have on users of the RIPE database. For this document the users have been categorised in four groups: users querying the database, AS and community guardians, maintainers of "inetnum" objects and maintainers of other database information. 2. Support for Classless Internet Addresses There are several aspects pertaining to the introduction of class- less Internet addresses in the RIPE Database as document in [2]. 2.1. Querying the RIPE database To support classless addresses in the RIPE database, one different representation of Internet addresses will be supported for queries to the database. This notation is the prefix/length notation as explained in [1]. Correct queries to the database will be for exam- ple: 192.87.45.0/24 192.87.228.0/23 128.141.0.0/16 193.0.0.132/32 For backward compatibility, "old" style queries will still be sup- ported. They are however internally to the database server trans- formed to a prefix/length notation, after which they are handled as above. This transformation could change the expected output. For example: ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 3 - 192.87.45 will be rewritten internally to 192.87.45.0/32 128.141 will be rewritten to 128.141.0.0/32 193.0.0.0 will be rewritten to 193.0.0.0/32 Other type queries that are supported, but not encouraged are pre- fix/length queries, for which the prefix is not a full dotted quad: 128.141/16 will be rewritten to 128.141.0.0/16 192.87.45/24 will be rewritten to 192.87.45.0/24 For queries where the prefix and the length are incompatible (like 192.87.45.0/8), the length will be used to mask off all extra bits from the prefix. This example will be rewritten to 192.0.0.0/8. % whois -r 193.1.209.0/24 inetnum: 193.1.209.0 netname: NCIR-LAN descr: Local Ethernet descr: National College of Industrial Relations descr: Sandford Road descr: Dublin 6 descr: Ireland country: IE admin-c: Neil Armstrong tech-c: Neil Armstrong connect: RIPE NSF aut-sys: AS1213 changed: mnorris(a)hea.ie 940823 source: RIPE % whois -r 193.1.209.0/8 inetnum: 193.0.0.0 - 193.255.255.255 netname: RIPE-CBLK descr: European Address Block #1 country: EU admin-c: DK58 tech-c: TB230 tech-c: MT2 remarks: delegated changed: testdb(a)ripe.net 940707 source: RIPE The default behavior for the RIPE database will be to respond to the query with an exact match if possible, or otherwise the first less specific match it can find. In most cases this will mean that when queries for host addresses (193.0.0.132/32) one will receive the network block this host is part of as registered in the database (in this case probably 193.0.0.0/24). ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 4 - % whois -r 193.0.0.132/32 inetnum: 193.0.0.0 netname: RIPE-NCC descr: RIPE Network Coordination Centre descr: Amsterdam, Netherlands country: NL admin-c: Daniel Karrenberg tech-c: Marten Terpstra tech-c: Tony Bates aut-sys: AS3333 ias-int: 193.0.0.221 AS1104 ias-int: 193.0.0.157 AS1104 rev-srv: ns.ripe.net rev-srv: ns.eu.net notify: ops(a)ripe.net changed: tony(a)ripe.net 940708 source: RIPE The RIPE NCC will also insert objects that describe a block delega- tion to an Internet Registry into the database. For example the block 193.1.0.0 - 193.1.255.255 delegated to HEANET, will have an associated entry in the database. When one would query a network number from this block that has not been allocated by HEANET yet, the server will respond with the object for the complete block. This means that less queries will result in a "No entries found" answer, but will give some indication of where that specific piece of address space currently resides. The same is true for address blocks 193.0.0.0 - 193.255.255.255 and 194.0.0.0 - 194.255.255.255 dele- gated to the RIPE NCC. % whois -r 193.1.141.0/24 inetnum: 193.1.0.0 - 193.1.255.255 netname: EU-BLOCK-193-1 descr: HEAnet country: IE admin-c: Mike Norris tech-c: Mike Norris remarks: delegated changed: marten(a)ripe.net 930901 source: RIPE The database server will also support some extra features to display the complete list of less specific matches, a list of direct more specific matches, and a list of more specific matches including more specifics of more specifics. The flags to enable these features can be found in the RIPE whois client manual page. All of these changes will take place at once when enabling the soft- ware that supports classless internet addresses at B1. Changes to tools that make use of the database server have to be made before ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 5 - that time. 2.2. Changes to the guardian files Currently all guardians of guarded attributes maintain files on the RIPE NCC database machine. These files are examined once per day and the associated guarded attribute added to all network objects listed in these files. When a network block is found in the database , and not all of the networks in this block are mentioned in a guardian file, this block is split so that only the mentioned networks get the associated guarded attribute. This procedure can no longer work in a classless database for two reasons: o from a block of network numbers it is no longer clear where one network ends and the next one starts. The class A, B and C boundaries no longer apply, so the software cannot make deci- sions any longer on where to split a block if necessary; o a certain network number can appear more than once in the database in different block entries. In normal cases, any net- work number assigned through the NCC will appear at least three times in the database: once in the entry describing the alloca- tion to an end-side or user, once as a block delegation from the NCC to a local registry, and once as a block delegation from IANA to the RIPE NCC. It is therefore impossible for the software to find out which of these blocks should be split and where this guarded attribute should be added. The way this will be solved is to only add guarded attributes to objects if the entry in the guardian file exactly matches the "inet- num" value of an object in the database. Assume we have a guardian file that contains two lines: 192.87.45.0 193.0.0.0 - 193.0.0.5 In this case, the guarded attribute associated with this file will NOT be added to entry "192.87.45.0 - 192.87.46.0", "193.0.0.0 - 193.255.255.0" or any other non-exact match in the database. Since blocks are no longer split, any line in the guardian file that does not correspond to an exact match in the database, will cause a notification mail message to be sent to the guardian with the expla- nation that no match could be found in the database. Because this is a direct effect of the enabling of the classless ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 6 - software, this change will have to be made at B1. This means that all guardians will have to check their files for non-matching entries and correct them. The NCC will assist all guardians that have an account on the NCC database machine by generating a problem file for them. This file will list all entries in their guardian file that are either not present in the database, or entries that are appear in a bigger block in the database. Any non-exact match can therefore easily be spotted. The program producing these files will run every night up till B1. The file generated will be called "problems" and will be put in the home directory of each of the guardians. Guardians are strongly requested to change their guardian files to eliminate any non-exact match before B1. At point B1, non-exact matches can cause a loss of guarded attributes. It should be noted that this transition is an interim measure to be used between T1 and T2. A completely new procedure to guard attributes and objects is outlined in [2] and a transition for that proposal is outlined in the next section. 3. Authorisation and Notification of Changes The RIPE NCC has produced a paper that describes a mechanism to authorise and notify any changes to objects in the RIPE database [2]. Although these changes apply to all objects in the database, there are some transition issues when these mechanisms are used to replace the current guarded attribute and guarded object procedure. The general use of the authentication and notification will be available from T1. 3.1. Guarded Attributes As explained in [4] the current procedure for guarded attributes is that guardians maintain files on the NCC database machine, from which guarded attributes are added to objects to the database. Although this has worked reasonably well for over a year, it can be solved with a more general authentication and notification scheme. This scheme is explained in [2]. The introduction of "route" objects in the RIPE database (see below) removes the necessity of guarded attributes in their current form. The primary reason for having guarded attributes (authenticity guar- antees because of their operational impact) can be solved by the general authentication scheme. The transition issues involved are of a bootstrap nature. This tran- sition plan foresees the generation of routes from existing network numbers. This will be explained in more detail in the next section. When these newly generated routes are to be used they should be properly maintained using the proposed mechanism. To bootstrap this procedure and to ensure that all routes are properly maintained, the NCC will generate an example "mntner" object [2] for all guardians ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 7 - that have an account on the NCC database machine. The information for this object will be placed in a file in each guardian's home directory. The file name will be "mntner". The information in this object will be derived as best as possible from the current guardian information. These objects will be gener- ated once only. The guardian can then change this object in whatever way he/she wishes. The guardian can even decide to already submit the modified "mntner" object generated for them to the database. At B2, all routes that will be generated from the current network numbers will be maintained by the maintainer mentioned in the file generated in the associated guardian accounts. To ensure that all generated routes are properly maintained, only the "mntner" file in each of the guardian's accounts will be used to tag the newly gener- ated routes. The "mntner" object found in this file will also be automatically entered into the database. Guardians that currently maintain multiple files on multiple accounts can decide to only reg- ister with a single "mntner" object. They will have to ensure that the "mntner" objects in all their accounts are equal. For more details see below. The current guardian procedure will be turned off at B2. At that time, the newly generated route objects should all be maintained, and the need for guardians in the current meaning will have disappeared. All guardian accounts and files will be removed shortly after B2. 3.2. Guarded Objects The RIPE database currently has support for guarded objects. These are objects that cannot be updated using the automatic procedure, but need to be manually checked by NCC staff and are then forwarded to the database. Currently the only guarded objects are "community" and "aut-num". This mechanism was put in place to avoid mistakes when updating operationally critical objects like autonomous system objects. It is fairly obvious that this procedure can be replaced using the authentication mechanism described in [2]. At T1, the maintainer mechanism will be enabled and current guarded attributes can start using this mechanism to replace the manual intervention by the NCC currently needed. For a certain time, guarded objects will still be accepted using the old mechanism (mailed to ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net for checking), but whenever a "mnt-by" attribute is present in any guarded object, these objects can be updated automatically. This does however mean it will have to pass the authorisation as specified by the maintainer. 4. Transition to RIPE-81++ There are several important aspects pertaining to the transition of the objects documented in RIPE-81++ [3]. This also includes the related "inet-rtr" object [5]. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 8 - 4.1. Separation of routing from allocation information This represents a significant change to both the database objects and to actual data in the database. The two database objects affected will be the existing "inetnum" [8] object and the "route" object as detailed in [3]. This will result in some information being moved from the "inetnum" [6] object to "route" object and some information being deleted from the "inetnum" object. If we look at an existing "inetnum" object: inetnum: 192.87.45.0 netname: RIPE-NCC descr: RIPE Network Coordination Centre descr: Amsterdam, Netherlands country: NL admin-c: Daniel Karrenberg tech-c: Marten Terpstra connect: RIPE NSF WCW aut-sys: AS3333 comm-list: SURFNET ias-int: 192.87.45.80 AS1104 ias-int: 192.87.45.6 AS2122 ias-int: 192.87.45.254 AS2600 rev-srv: ns.ripe.net rev-srv: ns.eu.net notify: ops(a)ripe.net changed: tony(a)ripe.net 940110 source: RIPE The routing information contained in the "inetnum" object will now be distributed over two objects like so: ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 9 - inetnum: 192.87.45.0 netname: RIPE-NCC descr: RIPE Network Coordination Centre descr: Amsterdam, Netherlands country: NL admin-c: Daniel Karrenberg tech-c: Marten Terpstra rev-srv: ns.ripe.net rev-srv: ns.eu.net notify: ops(a)ripe.net changed: tony(a)ripe.net 940110 source: RIPE route: 192.87.45.0/24 descr: RIPE Network Coordination Centre origin: AS3333 comm-list: SURFNET remarks: ias-int: 192.87.45.80 AS1104 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.45.6 AS2122 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.45.254 AS2600 changed: dfk(a)ripe.net 940427 source: RIPE The general idea is all routing based information is moved from attributes within the "inetnum" object to the "route" object (1). It is important to note the direct effect this have on the "inetnum" object data. Table 2 below gives a full list of the transitioned attributes. It should also be noted that in an effort to clean up the "inetnum" object at the same time certain attributes will be obsoleted. The effect column has an T for transitioned and an O for obsoleted. +------------------+--------+-----------------+ |inetnum attribute | effect | route attribute | +------------------+--------+-----------------+ |aut-sys | T | origin | |comm-list | T | comm-list | |ias-int | T | remark | |connect | O | | |gateway | O | | |routpr-l | O | | |bdrygw-l | O | | +------------------+--------+-----------------+ Table 2: Affected attributes As can be seen a simple translation can be made and this will be the _________________________ (1) The "ias-int" attributes are preserved as re- marks. See details of "inet-rtr" object for reasoning behind this. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 10 - last major transition step at time T2. 4.2. Auto-Generation of "Route" and New "Inetnum" objects Clearly, the transitioning of data will require a major flag day where the translation of attributes detailed in Table 2 takes place. This is expected to occur at big bang B2. At point B2 the RIPE NCC will automatically generate both new "route" and "inetnum" objects in line with Table 2 and load them into the RIPE database. It should be noted that these changes will only take place to "inetnum" objects with have an associated "aut- sys" attribute. All "inetnum" objects not containing the aut-sys attribute will have both T and O attributes removed. This may mean the potential loss of comm-list information if there is no corre- sponding aut-sys attribute for the existing "inetnum" object. Between time T1 and T2 the NCC will generate for each guardian account both the translated "inetnum" and "route" objects in the form of files known as: new.inetnum This file will contain a full list of "to be generated" "inet- num" objects. new.route This file will contain a full list of "to be generate" "route" objects. These files will be re-written every night and are purely given to give each guardian of what will happen to any associated object ref- erencing a guarded attribute after B2. The new "route" objects will be automatically split into CIDR [7] compliant aggregates. Below is a simple example of an automatic object split from the current "inetnum" to a new "inetnum" and "route" object. The original "inetnum" is as follows: inetnum: 193.12.128.0 - 193.12.132.0 netname: SE-COMVIS-NET descr: ComputerVision Sweden AB country: SE admin-c: Anders Andersson tech-c: Anders Andersson connect: SWIP aut-sys: AS1257 changed: uffe(a)swip.net 930707 source: RIPE ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 11 - The will be translated to an new "inetnum" object as follows: inetnum: 193.12.128.0 - 193.12.132.0 netname: SE-COMVIS-NET descr: ComputerVision Sweden AB country: SE admin-c: Anders Andersson tech-c: Anders Andersson changed: uffe(a)swip.net 930707 source: RIPE Notice all attributes noted in Table 2 are now removed. The follow- ing two (yes two, because this entry was not CIDR [7] aligned) "route" objects are also generated: route: 193.12.128.0/22 descr: SE-COMVIS-NET origin: AS1257 mnt-by: AS1257-MNT changed: ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net 940829 source: RIPE route: 193.12.132.0/24 descr: SE-COMVIS-NET origin: AS1257 mnt-by: AS1257-MNT changed: ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net 940829 source: RIPE You also see that mnt-by attributes have been added to the "route" objects. This information has been derived from the "maintainer" files in each guardian account (see above for details of this). In this case the guardian of AS1257 named his maintainer object "AS1257-MNT". All other administrative attributes are preserved in both the "inetnum" and "route" objects which exception of the changed field which in the "route" object will just represent the At the time B2, you will also see both the new "inetnum" and "route" objects in the database. If "inetnum" entries are sent into the database with obsoleted attributes the entries will be accepted with the obsoleted attributes removed and a warning sent back indicating the obsoleted attributes have been removed. The auto-generation will happen at a set time at B2. This is a one- time operation and all users of the RIPE database should be aware of this major change. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 12 - 4.3. The "inet-rtr" object The "inet-rtr" object is an object which can be used to describe any router within an autonomous system [5]. This object can be used as of time T1. One important piece of the "inet-rtr" object is that it will replace the "ias-int" attribute used in the old "inetnum" object. We encourage all users of the "ias-int" attribute to regis- ter new "inet-rtr" object from time T1 onwards. In an effort to pre- serve any loss of "ias-int" information when the auto-generation of "route"'s and "inetnum"'s takes place the ias-int information will be included as a "remarks" attribute in the generated "route" object. Here is a simple example: route: 192.87.4.0/24 descr: EUR-IP origin: AS1755 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.4.17 AS1755 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.4.18 AS1103 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.4.19 AS2121 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.4.20 AS286 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.4.21 AS1104 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.4.22 AS1755 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.4.24 AS1103 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.4.35 AS1128 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.4.27 AS1890 remarks: ias-int: 192.87.4.28 AS3333 changed: ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net 940829 source: RIPE We realise this is non optimal and encourage the use of the "inet- rtr" object from time T1 onwards. 4.4. New "RIPE-81++" Syntax All proposed "ripe-81++" syntax will be accepted after B1 at time T1, with the exception of the changes to "inetnum" and "route" objects which will not be accepted until B2 at time T2 (see section "Auto-Generation of "Route" and New "Inetnum" objects" above for reasoning behind this). The direct effect of this is you will see different whois output. The most important aspect will be the addi- tion of syntactic sugar to the existing "as-in" and "as-out" attributes as well as the ability to use the attributes as well. To highlight this change if we look at a current "aut-num" object a whois query would produce the following: ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 13 - aut-num: AS1104 descr: NIKHEF-H descr: Science Park Watergraafsmeer descr: Amsterdam, The Netherlands as-in: AS1103 100 AS1103 as-in: AS1890 100 AS1890 AS2004 AS288 as-in: AS1888 100 AS1888 as-in: AS2122 200 AS2122 AS2600 as-in: AS2600 100 AS2600 as-in: AS3333 100 AS3333 as-out: AS1103 AS1104 as-out: AS1890 AS1104 as-out: AS1888 AS1104 as-out: AS2122 AS1104 as-out: AS2600 AS1104 as-out: AS3333 AS1104 default: AS1103 100 guardian: ripe-op(a)nikhef.nl admin-c: Rob Blokzijl tech-c: Marten Terpstra remarks: peers with AS2122 and AS2600 are RR test peers notify: tony(a)ripe.net notify: marten(a)ripe.net changed: tony(a)ripe.net 940426 source: RIPE As of B1 the same query will produce: ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 14 - aut-num: AS1104 descr: NIKHEF-H descr: Science Park Watergraafsmeer descr: Amsterdam, The Netherlands as-in: from AS1103 100 accept AS1103 as-in: from AS1890 100 accept AS1890 AS2004 AS288 as-in: from AS1888 100 accept AS1888 as-in: from AS2122 200 accept AS2122 AS2600 as-in: from AS2600 100 accept AS2600 as-in: from AS3333 100 accept AS3333 as-out: to AS1103 announce AS1104 as-out: to AS1890 announce AS1104 as-out: to AS1888 announce AS1104 as-out: to AS2122 announce AS1104 as-out: to AS2600 announce AS1104 as-out: to AS3333 announce AS1104 default: AS1103 100 guardian: ripe-op(a)nikhef.nl admin-c: Rob Blokzijl tech-c: Marten Terpstra remarks: peers with AS2122 and AS2600 are RR test peers notify: tony(a)ripe.net notify: marten(a)ripe.net changed: tony(a)ripe.net 940426 source: RIPE This is an important subtle change and anyone using tools should be aware of this change. To provide some backward compatibility it is possible to use the "-S" flag to the whois server to produce output without the added syntax information. A whois client supporting this flag will also be made available at B1. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 15 - 5. Visible Changes and Actions Required by User Group The effects of the B1/B2 changes and the actions needed by the dif- ferent groups of RIPE database users are summarised below. This is intended as a check list for members of those user groups. It should be noted most readers of this document will belong to more than one group. 5.1. Routing Registry Guardians This group comprises those who maintain the information in the Rout- ing Registry part of the database: "aut-num" and "community" guardians and guardian file maintainers. This group will see the most changes and need to take some actions. 5.1.1. Between now and B1 Action Change entries in guardian files to exactly match single database objects. 5.1.2. After B1 and before B2 Action Check and update the "mntner" objects generated in the guardian accounts, thus establishing a mapping between guardian files and "mntner" objects. Action Check the file of generated "route" objects and modified "inet- num" objects in the guardian account for errors and report those to the NCC. 5.1.3. After B2 Change Guardian file mechanism is no longer needed and disabled. Change Route objects created. Action Clean up guardian accounts. Action Align any locally stored objects with the split objects. Action Check "route" objects for remarks containing "ias-int" attributes and create "inet-rtr" objects where necessary. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 16 - 5.2. Local Registries This is the group who maintains "inetnum" objects. They will see the consequences of the "inetnum"/"route" split and will be able to use the new authorisation scheme. 5.2.1. Between now and B1 No changes or actions before B1. 5.2.2. After B1 and before B2 Change Now possible to store multiple "inetnum" objects covering the same address space at different levels. Change All representations decribed in [1] can be used for object sub- mission. Change New authorisation now available. Action Coordinate authorisation on objects maintained by more than one party. Action Prepare for "inetnum"/"route" split especially when storing data locally. Action Check "inetnum" objects for "ias-int" attributes and create "inet-rtr" objects where necessary. 5.2.3. After B2 Change Some attributes obsoleted and some moved to "route" object. Action Align any locally stored objects with the split objects. Action Stop submitting obsolete/moved attributes. 5.3. Maintainers of other Objects This group will basically only see added authorisation features and the need for coordination of this when multiple parties maintain an object. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 17 - 5.3.1. Between now and B1 No changes or actions before B1. 5.3.2. Change New authorisation now available. Action Coordinate authorisation on objects maintained by more than one party. 5.3.3. After B2 No changes or actions after B2. 5.4. Users of RIPE DB Information This is the group who queries the RIPE whois server and/or uses the database files. 5.4.1. Between now and B1 Action Check and adapt tools for the effects of B1: queries will return less specific matches if no exact match can be found. 5.4.2. After B1 and before B2 Change Network number queries can be classless and return less spe- cific matches if no exact match is found. Change Ability to obtain less and more specific matches on network number queries. Action Check and prepare tools for the effects of B2: "route"/"inetnum" split, obsoleted attributes, new attributes, syntactic sugar returned by default in "aut-num". 5.4.3. After B2 Change Effects of "route"/"inetnum" split will be visible. 6. Results The results from this three phase transition will the following ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 18 - achievements. 1) A fully supported classless database (as of B1). 2) A new and improved authorisation and maintenance mechanism (as of B2). 3) Full support of ripe-81++ features (completed by B2 and most available from B1). As with any transition of this type some change of data is unavoid- able and a number of "big bang" days need to be factored in. How- ever, the end result is a clear improvement to both the RIPE alloca- tion and routing registry. Throughout the whole transition period the RIPE NCC will be available to make emergency changes to data if needed and deemed to be critical. All queries should be directed towards ncc(a)ripe.net. 7. References [1] Bates, T., Karrenberg, D., Terpstra, M., "Support for Classless Internet Addresses in the RIPE Database", DRAFT, May 1994. [2] Karrenberg, D., Terpstra, M., "Authorisation and Notification of Changes in the RIPE Database", DRAFT, Aug 1994. [3] Bates et al, "Representation of IP Routing Policies in a Rout- ing Registry (ripe-81++), DRAFT, August 1994. [4] Bates, T., "Support of Guarded fields within the RIPE Database", ripe-117, July 1994. [5] Bates, T., "Specifying an `Internet Router' in the Routing Reg- istry", DRAFT, July 1994. [6] Lord, A., Terpstra, M., "RIPE Database Template for Networks and Persons", DRAFT, May 1994. [7] Fuller, V et al, "Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): an Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy", RFC1519, Septem- ber 1993. [8] Karrenberg, D., "RIPE Database Template for Networks", ripe-050, April 1992. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994

1 0

ripe-60 phased out
by Marten Terpstra 06 Sep '94

06 Sep '94

Folks, I have the pleasure to announce that as of tomorrow morning all occurences of boundary gateways and routing privileges will be removed from the RIPE database. This means that ripe-60 has finally been phased out completely. -Marten

1 0

The Top 20 and some deltas
by Tony Bates 31 Aug '94

31 Aug '94

This is an auto-generated mail on Wed Aug 31 21:10:00 MET DST 1994 As stated above this is auto-generated so it is not checked before it leaves my workstation. This is a list of the "Top 20" players who if CIDRizing at the AS level could make a significant gain in the size of Internet routing tables. This may be an over-estimation but it is hoped that this can act as an incentive for the "Top 20" and others to look at their CIDR capability. This report is available as: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/cidr/stats/Top-20.31Aug94 The current (and of course this one today) report is always accessible as: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/cidr/stats/Top-20 A full summary of all the ASes seen in the Internet can be seen by looking in: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/cidr/stats/AS* Please also find a summary of the last weeks changes in terms of withdrawn and added routes. Please note that this is only a snapshot but does some indication of ASes participating in CIDR. More information can be found in: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/cidr/stats/Delta.* Also, for a short time this gives details of any possibly interesting aggregates currently seen in the routing. Interesting here means not a aggregate made as a chuck of classful routes. This a daily snaphost of changes in classfull routes being withdrawn and added. the deltas are calculated over a rolling 7 day period. Please bear in mind this is purely a "snapshot" and a large flucuation could be caused by a connectivity problem for example. However, this does give some indication of service providers that are moving to classless routing. Top 20 Withdrawn Routes from 24Aug94 to 31Aug94 -149 AS2907 SINET-AS -111 AS19 CSS-DOMAIN -44 AS372 NSN-AMES-AS -26 AS97 JVNC-AS -19 AS200 BARRNET-AS -16 AS93 MIDNET-AS -9 AS279 SURANET-AS-2 -8 AS1741 FUNET autonomous system -6 AS2150 CSUNET-SW -4 AS2277 ECUANET -3 AS2380 ESTNET Autonomous System -2 AS2149 PSINET-2 -1 AS3578 MV-1 Top 20 Added Routes from 24Aug94 to 31Aug94 87 AS3559 KORNET 42 AS701 AlterNet 35 AS1331 NSFNETTEST36-AS 18 AS1270 EUnet/DE 17 AS137 GARR 16 AS1237 EUNSOL-AS 14 AS1239 SprintLink 13 AS2588 Institute of Mathematics and CS 10 AS544 The DataNet IP Service 9 AS1275 DFN-IP 8 AS560 NEARNET-EXT-AS 7 AS267 CICNET2-AS 5 AS803 SASK-NET-AS 4 AS271 BCNET-AS 3 AS2548 DIGEX-AS 2 AS2510 JNIC-ASN 1 AS1327 NSFNETTEST32-AS List of possibly interesting aggregates --------------------------------------- aggregate origin-AS AS Description 157.166.2.0/24 AS1685 ANS-BLK1 157.166.102.0/24 AS1685 ANS-BLK1 157.166.134.0/24 AS1685 ANS-BLK1 157.166.144.0/24 AS1686 ANS-BLK1 157.166.152.0/24 AS1686 ANS-BLK1 157.166.208.0/24 AS1686 ANS-BLK1 193.195.1.4/30 AS786 The JANET IP Service 194.46.1.4/30 AS2873 Genesis Project Internet Servi 194.46.17.4/30 AS2873 Genesis Project Internet Servi Here follows the last weeks "Top 20" list with the corresponding date. --- 31Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1275 643 632 49.6% AlterNet AS174 1363 971 392 28.8% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1134 819 315 27.8% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 478 247 231 48.3% EUnet/DE AS560 595 427 168 28.2% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 255 117 138 54.1% SINGAPORE-AS AS279 497 364 133 26.8% SURANET-AS-2 AS1275 323 198 125 38.7% DFN-IP AS97 375 275 100 26.7% JVNC-AS AS271 205 111 94 45.9% BCNET-AS AS2150 184 96 88 47.8% CSUNET-SW AS786 299 218 81 27.1% The JANET IP Service AS1239 379 300 79 20.8% SprintLink AS2493 158 86 72 45.6% FONOROLA-EAST AS1955 144 73 71 49.3% Computer and Automation Institute AS86 350 282 68 19.4% SURANET-AS AS297 238 170 68 28.6% NSN-UMD-AS AS1329 122 55 67 54.9% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS1225 312 246 66 21.2% CICNET3-AS AS1849 262 198 64 24.4% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange --- 30Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1267 640 627 49.5% AlterNet AS174 1375 965 410 29.8% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1162 830 332 28.6% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 479 248 231 48.2% EUnet/DE AS560 596 426 170 28.5% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 505 369 136 26.9% SURANET-AS-2 AS1250 246 118 128 52.0% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 323 198 125 38.7% DFN-IP AS97 371 273 98 26.4% JVNC-AS AS271 205 111 94 45.9% BCNET-AS AS2150 182 99 83 45.6% CSUNET-SW AS786 299 218 81 27.1% The JANET IP Service AS1239 379 300 79 20.8% SprintLink AS2493 157 85 72 45.9% FONOROLA-EAST AS1955 145 73 72 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS86 349 281 68 19.5% SURANET-AS AS1329 120 53 67 55.8% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS1849 261 197 64 24.5% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS209 321 258 63 19.6% WESTNET-EAST AS1225 310 248 62 20.0% CICNET3-AS --- 29Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1260 636 624 49.5% AlterNet AS174 1341 951 390 29.1% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1169 840 329 28.1% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 478 247 231 48.3% EUnet/DE AS560 595 425 170 28.6% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 492 359 133 27.0% SURANET-AS-2 AS1250 242 120 122 50.4% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 313 202 111 35.5% DFN-IP AS271 205 111 94 45.9% BCNET-AS AS97 358 267 91 25.4% JVNC-AS AS2150 186 98 88 47.3% CSUNET-SW AS786 299 218 81 27.1% The JANET IP Service AS1239 381 301 80 21.0% SprintLink AS1955 145 73 72 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS2493 157 86 71 45.2% FONOROLA-EAST AS86 350 282 68 19.4% SURANET-AS AS1329 120 53 67 55.8% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS1849 261 197 64 24.5% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1225 306 244 62 20.3% CICNET3-AS AS209 323 263 60 18.6% WESTNET-EAST --- 28Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1240 631 609 49.1% AlterNet AS174 1342 955 387 28.8% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1130 818 312 27.6% NSN-AMES-AS AS372 1130 818 312 27.6% NSN-AMES-AS AS372 1130 818 312 27.6% NSN-AMES-AS AS372 1130 818 312 27.6% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 478 247 231 48.3% EUnet/DE AS1270 478 247 231 48.3% EUnet/DE AS560 595 425 170 28.6% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 495 362 133 26.9% SURANET-AS-2 AS1250 232 120 112 48.3% SINGAPORE-AS AS1250 232 120 112 48.3% SINGAPORE-AS AS1250 232 120 112 48.3% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 313 202 111 35.5% DFN-IP AS97 358 260 98 27.4% JVNC-AS AS271 205 111 94 45.9% BCNET-AS AS271 205 111 94 45.9% BCNET-AS AS2150 181 94 87 48.1% CSUNET-SW AS786 299 218 81 27.1% The JANET IP Service AS1239 382 302 80 20.9% SprintLink --- 27Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1241 632 609 49.1% AlterNet AS174 1355 958 397 29.3% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1147 821 326 28.4% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 464 247 217 46.8% EUnet/DE AS560 597 424 173 29.0% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 496 365 131 26.4% SURANET-AS-2 AS1275 313 202 111 35.5% DFN-IP AS1250 231 121 110 47.6% SINGAPORE-AS AS97 360 259 101 28.1% JVNC-AS AS271 205 111 94 45.9% BCNET-AS AS2150 188 99 89 47.3% CSUNET-SW AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1239 381 301 80 21.0% SprintLink AS1955 145 73 72 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS2493 155 86 69 44.5% FONOROLA-EAST AS86 350 282 68 19.4% SURANET-AS AS1329 120 53 67 55.8% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS1849 259 195 64 24.7% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS209 319 259 60 18.8% WESTNET-EAST AS2044 130 70 60 46.2% WORLDNET-AS --- 26Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1239 628 611 49.3% AlterNet AS174 1374 952 422 30.7% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1184 849 335 28.3% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 462 246 216 46.8% EUnet/DE AS560 586 417 169 28.8% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 498 364 134 26.9% SURANET-AS-2 AS1250 242 125 117 48.3% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 313 202 111 35.5% DFN-IP AS97 395 286 109 27.6% JVNC-AS AS271 201 108 93 46.3% BCNET-AS AS2150 189 99 90 47.6% CSUNET-SW AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1239 378 298 80 21.2% SprintLink AS1955 145 73 72 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS2493 151 80 71 47.0% FONOROLA-EAST AS86 350 283 67 19.1% SURANET-AS AS1329 119 52 67 56.3% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS1225 311 244 67 21.5% CICNET3-AS AS1849 260 196 64 24.6% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS209 319 259 60 18.8% WESTNET-EAST --- 25Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1232 628 604 49.0% AlterNet AS174 1357 952 405 29.8% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1165 837 328 28.2% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 245 216 46.9% EUnet/DE AS560 587 419 168 28.6% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS2907 321 180 141 43.9% SINET-AS AS279 494 364 130 26.3% SURANET-AS-2 AS1250 241 124 117 48.5% SINGAPORE-AS AS97 405 293 112 27.7% JVNC-AS AS1275 314 203 111 35.4% DFN-IP AS271 201 108 93 46.3% BCNET-AS AS2150 189 99 90 47.6% CSUNET-SW AS19 374 288 86 23.0% CSS-DOMAIN AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1955 145 73 72 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 365 293 72 19.7% SprintLink AS2493 151 80 71 47.0% FONOROLA-EAST AS1329 118 51 67 56.8% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS1225 309 244 65 21.0% CICNET3-AS AS86 346 282 64 18.5% SURANET-AS --- 24Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1233 629 604 49.0% AlterNet AS174 1350 950 400 29.6% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1178 838 340 28.9% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 460 245 215 46.7% EUnet/DE AS560 587 419 168 28.6% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 506 372 134 26.5% SURANET-AS-2 AS2907 302 172 130 43.0% SINET-AS AS1250 242 122 120 49.6% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 314 203 111 35.4% DFN-IP AS97 401 292 109 27.2% JVNC-AS AS271 201 108 93 46.3% BCNET-AS AS2150 190 100 90 47.4% CSUNET-SW AS19 371 289 82 22.1% CSS-DOMAIN AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1955 145 73 72 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 365 293 72 19.7% SprintLink AS2493 149 81 68 45.6% FONOROLA-EAST AS1329 119 52 67 56.3% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS86 347 282 65 18.7% SURANET-AS AS1849 260 196 64 24.6% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange

1 0

A summary of changes of RIPE-81++ from last RIPE meeting
by Tony Bates 26 Aug '94

26 Aug '94

This is the promised summary of changes of document to help focus discussion at the forthcoming RIPE meeting. URL: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/drafts/ripe-81++.changes.txt -- Text version URL: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/drafts/ripe-81++.changes.ps -- PS version --Tony. Summary of changes in RIPE-81++ from previous RIPE Meeting. Tony Bates 23rd August, 1994 1. Introduction In an effort to focus discussion for the forthcoming RIPE meeting in Lisbon in September I have made a brief outline of the changes to the RIPE-81++ draft from the last RIPE meeting. It is divided into two sections; basic and major changes. The major changes section will be most relevant for the forthcoming RIPE meeting and in par- ticular the RIPE routing working group. The latest RIPE-81++ draft is available from: URL: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/drafts/ripe-81++.{ps,txt} 2. Basic Agreed Changes This sections details the changes that were agreed and have been fully incorporated into the current draft of RIPE-81++. All the changes are with respect to the RIPE-81++ proposal tabled at the RIPE meeting in Amsterdam in May, 1994. In each case only very brief detail is given as these changes have been agreed by consensus. Network Lists. Add the use of network lists in the routing policy expression com- ponent. This will be in the form proposed by Merit. i.e. list of nets separate by commas within braces: { 35.0.0.0/8, 192.87.45.0/24 } Extension to "default" attribute There is a set of additional OPTIONAL components added to the default attribute. See RIPE-81++ for more details. - 2 - Syntactic SUGAR We added in the additional reserved words to make the syntax clearer. NOTE: the reserved words will all be in lower-case to dis- tinguish them from special policy keywords and communities. Here is a summary of current SUGAR to add and where. accept announce exclude from to transit Examples of the usage of the reserved words are: as-in: from neighborAS accept route as-out: to neighborAS announce route as-exclude: exclude ASpath to destination as-transit: transit ASpath to destination default: from neighborAS accept route default: to neighborAS announce route Note: that as-transit is an experimental attribute. See below. Network Representation We used the "prefix length" notation documented in the classless proposal paper. i.e. 35.0.0.0/8 192.87.45.0/24 "as-reject" changed to "as-exclude" The text remained the same. The name of the attribute changed. 3. Major Changes This section details the major changes with respect to the draft - 3 - presented at the RIPE meeting in Amsterdam in May, 1994. The "component" attribute is gone The component attribute was dropped as it was deemed to be too com- plex to understand and too difficult to maintain and guard. The out- come of this is two new attributes and one new object that facili- tate the functionality of the component attribute 1) withdrawn attribute Often is is useful to show a route that has been withdrawn from the routing table. The has become very important now that CIDR is deployed as service providers start to withdraw more specific routes from an aggregate. 2) hole attribute For tools in can be very useful to indicate "holes" in a CIDR aggregate where there is currently no expected connectivity. 3) inet-rtr object This allows you to detail the interfaces of a router as well as the AS the router belong to. This is extremely useful for routes/networks which fall into the category of what used to be called "inter-as networks" described by the proposed to be obsoleted "ias-int" attribute in the "inetnum" object. This object is described in: Bates, T., "Specifying an `Internet Router' in the Routing Registry", July, 1994. DRAFT. URL: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/drafts/inet-rtr.{ps,txt} The "interas-in" and "interas-out" attributes. This is an additional set of attributes added to detail local poli- cies between any two ASes which have more than one interconnecting link. This description is necessary only if the ASs are connected in more than one way and the routing policy and differs at these two connections. Example: LINK1 193.0.1.1 +----------+ 193.0.1.2 | | AS1------AS2== ==AS3-----AS4 | | 193.0.1.5 +----------+ 193.0.1.6 LINK2 - 4 - Descriptions of interas policies do not replace the global pol- icy described in as-in, as-out and other policy attributes which always describes the global policy between the two ASes. The interas-in/out attributes only specify local variations to the glo- bal policy described in the other attributes. If the global policy mentions more routes than the local policy then local preferences for these routes are assumed to be equal for all links. A simple extendable syntax has been defined for this additional information. For details of this refer to the ripe-81++ draft. Possible outstanding issues with interas-in/interas-out A major discussion point came from these attributes The ordering There were two styles of ordering proposed. A) interas-in: <my id> [from] ASxx <neighbor id> <pref> <pol- icy> B) interas-in: [from] ASxxx <my id> <neighbor id> <pref> <pol- icy> Fortunately, an executive decision has been made by the chair of the RIPE routing group to go with option B. The main reason behind this is for consistency with the as-in and as-out attri- butes. Clarification of evaluation of operators. Some text has been added to clarify the ordering of how the logical operators are evaluated in routing policy expressions and what they actually mean. It was recognised that ripe-81++ was weak on this point. This text is taken verbatim from the ripe-81++ draft: .... <routing policy expression> can take the following formats. 1. A list of one or more ASes, AS Macros, Communities or Net- work Lists. A Network List is a list of network numbers in prefix length format, separated by commas, and surrounded by curly brackets (braces, i.e. `{' and '}'). Examples: - 5 - as-in: from AS1103 100 accept AS1103 as-in: from AS786 105 accept AS1103 as-in: from AS786 10 accept AS786 HEPNET as-in: from AS1755 110 accept AS1103 AS786 as-in: from AS3333 100 accept {192.87.45.0/16, 128.141.0.0/16} 2. A set of KEYWORDS. The following KEYWORD is currently defined: ANY this means anything the neighbour AS knows. 3. A logical expression of either 1 or 2 above The current logical operators are defined as: AND OR NOT This operators are defined as true BOOLEAN operators even if the operands themselves do not appear to be BOOLEAN. Their operations are defined as follows: Operator Operation Example OR UNION AS1 OR AS2 | +-> all routes in AS1 or AS2. AND INTERSECTION AS1 AND HEPNET | +-> a route in AS1 and belonging to community HEPNET. NOT COMPLEMENT NOT AS3 | +-> any route except AS3 routes. Rules are grouped together using parenthesis i.e "(" and ")". The ordering of evaluation of operators and there associa- tion is as follows: Operator Associativity () left to right NOT right to left AND left to right OR left to right - 6 - NOTE: if no logical operator is given between ASes, AS- macros, Communities, Network Lists and KEYWORDS it is implicitly evaluated as an `OR' operation. The OR can be left out for conciseness. However, please note the opera- tors are still evaluated as below so make sure you include parentheses whenever needed. To highlight this here is a simple example. If we denoted a policy of for example; from AS1755 I accept all routes except routes from AS1, A2 and AS3 and you enter the following as-in line. as-in: from AS1755 100 accept NOT AS1 AS2 AS3 This will be evaluated as: as-in: from AS1755 100 accept NOT AS1 OR AS2 OR AS3 Which in turn would be evaluated like this: (NOT AS1) OR AS2 OR AS3 -> ((ANY except AS1) union AS2) union AS3) --> (ANY except AS1) This is clearly incorrect and not the desired result. The correct syntax should be: as-in: from AS1755 100 accept NOT (AS1 AS2 AS3) Producing the following evaluation: NOT (AS1 OR AS2 OR AS3) -> (ANY) except (union of AS1, AS2, AS3) Which depicts the desired routing policy. Note that can also be written as below which is perhaps somewhat clearer: as-in: from AS1755 100 accept ANY AND NOT (AS1 OR AS2 OR AS3)

1 0

The Top 20 and some deltas
by Tony Bates 24 Aug '94

24 Aug '94

This is an auto-generated mail on Wed Aug 24 21:10:00 MET DST 1994 As stated above this is auto-generated so it is not checked before it leaves my workstation. This is a list of the "Top 20" players who if CIDRizing at the AS level could make a significant gain in the size of Internet routing tables. This may be an over-estimation but it is hoped that this can act as an incentive for the "Top 20" and others to look at their CIDR capability. This report is available as: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/cidr/stats/Top-20.24Aug94 The current (and of course this one today) report is always accessible as: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/cidr/stats/Top-20 A full summary of all the ASes seen in the Internet can be seen by looking in: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/cidr/stats/AS* Please also find a summary of the last weeks changes in terms of withdrawn and added routes. Please note that this is only a snapshot but does some indication of ASes participating in CIDR. More information can be found in: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/cidr/stats/Delta.* Also, for a short time this gives details of any possibly interesting aggregates currently seen in the routing. Interesting here means not a aggregate made as a chuck of classful routes. This a daily snaphost of changes in classfull routes being withdrawn and added. the deltas are calculated over a rolling 7 day period. Please bear in mind this is purely a "snapshot" and a large flucuation could be caused by a connectivity problem for example. However, this does give some indication of service providers that are moving to classless routing. Top 20 Withdrawn Routes from 17Aug94 to 24Aug94 -268 AS19 CSS-DOMAIN -143 AS1740 CERFNET -121 AS568 SUMNET-AS -27 AS1237 EUNSOL-AS -15 AS1849 PIPEX, Public IP EXchange -14 AS2120 DAXnet -11 AS195 SDSC-AS -9 AS35 MICATON -8 AS81 CONCERT -7 AS1267 I2U Autonomous System -6 AS1270 EUnet/DE -5 AS1853 ACOnet Backbone -4 AS267 CICNET2-AS -3 AS685 NWNET-AS -2 AS1759 The DataNet IP Service -1 AS2116 EUnet Norway Top 20 Added Routes from 17Aug94 to 24Aug94 162 AS2907 SINET-AS 72 AS701 AlterNet 45 AS3609 CYBER-NET 32 AS1729 TIPnet 22 AS3559 KORNET 16 AS137 GARR 14 AS1329 NSFNETTEST34-AS 13 AS1327 NSFNETTEST32-AS 12 AS719 LANLINK autonomous system 11 AS2118 RELCOM-AS 8 AS1741 FUNET autonomous system 7 AS297 NSN-UMD-AS 6 AS1257 SWIPnet Swedish IP Network 5 AS271 BCNET-AS 4 AS2871 MAZ/CLS 3 AS3354 THENET-AS-1 2 AS1103 SURFnet IP 1 AS2149 PSINET-2 List of possibly interesting aggregates --------------------------------------- aggregate origin-AS AS Description 157.166.2.0/24 AS1685 ANS-BLK1 157.166.102.0/24 AS1685 ANS-BLK1 157.166.134.0/24 AS1685 ANS-BLK1 157.166.144.0/24 AS1686 ANS-BLK1 157.166.152.0/24 AS1686 ANS-BLK1 157.166.208.0/24 AS1686 ANS-BLK1 193.195.1.4/30 AS786 The JANET IP Service 193.232.88.16/28 AS1803 ICMNET-5 194.46.1.4/30 AS2873 Genesis Project Internet Servi 194.46.17.4/30 AS2873 Genesis Project Internet Servi Here follows the last weeks "Top 20" list with the corresponding date. --- 24Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1233 629 604 49.0% AlterNet AS174 1350 950 400 29.6% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1178 838 340 28.9% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 460 245 215 46.7% EUnet/DE AS560 587 419 168 28.6% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 506 372 134 26.5% SURANET-AS-2 AS2907 302 172 130 43.0% SINET-AS AS1250 242 122 120 49.6% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 314 203 111 35.4% DFN-IP AS97 401 292 109 27.2% JVNC-AS AS271 201 108 93 46.3% BCNET-AS AS2150 190 100 90 47.4% CSUNET-SW AS19 371 289 82 22.1% CSS-DOMAIN AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1955 145 73 72 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 365 293 72 19.7% SprintLink AS2493 149 81 68 45.6% FONOROLA-EAST AS1329 119 52 67 56.3% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS86 347 282 65 18.7% SURANET-AS AS1849 260 196 64 24.6% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange --- 23Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1210 624 586 48.4% AlterNet AS174 1373 954 419 30.5% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1156 823 333 28.8% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 245 216 46.9% EUnet/DE AS560 590 421 169 28.6% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 503 366 137 27.2% SURANET-AS-2 AS19 458 329 129 28.2% CSS-DOMAIN AS1250 243 123 120 49.4% SINGAPORE-AS AS97 404 292 112 27.7% JVNC-AS AS1275 314 203 111 35.4% DFN-IP AS271 201 108 93 46.3% BCNET-AS AS2150 190 100 90 47.4% CSUNET-SW AS786 299 218 81 27.1% The JANET IP Service AS1849 279 205 74 26.5% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1955 145 73 72 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 364 292 72 19.8% SprintLink AS2493 148 80 68 45.9% FONOROLA-EAST AS1329 118 51 67 56.8% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS209 321 259 62 19.3% WESTNET-EAST AS86 342 282 60 17.5% SURANET-AS --- 22Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1172 621 551 47.0% AlterNet AS174 1346 945 401 29.8% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1146 819 327 28.5% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 245 216 46.9% EUnet/DE AS19 625 419 206 33.0% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 588 419 169 28.7% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 496 362 134 27.0% SURANET-AS-2 AS1250 241 122 119 49.4% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 314 203 111 35.4% DFN-IP AS97 394 289 105 26.6% JVNC-AS AS271 201 108 93 46.3% BCNET-AS AS2150 189 98 91 48.1% CSUNET-SW AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1955 145 73 72 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1849 277 205 72 26.0% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1239 361 289 72 19.9% SprintLink AS1329 118 51 67 56.8% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS2493 139 77 62 44.6% FONOROLA-EAST AS209 323 261 62 19.2% WESTNET-EAST AS86 343 283 60 17.5% SURANET-AS --- 21Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1139 602 537 47.1% AlterNet AS174 1347 943 404 30.0% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1127 806 321 28.5% NSN-AMES-AS AS19 635 417 218 34.3% CSS-DOMAIN AS1270 461 245 216 46.9% EUnet/DE AS560 589 420 169 28.7% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 498 361 137 27.5% SURANET-AS-2 AS1275 314 203 111 35.4% DFN-IP AS97 395 289 106 26.8% JVNC-AS AS1250 204 108 96 47.1% SINGAPORE-AS AS271 201 108 93 46.3% BCNET-AS AS2150 187 99 88 47.1% CSUNET-SW AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1955 144 72 72 50.0% Computer and Automation Institute AS1849 277 205 72 26.0% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1239 359 287 72 20.1% SprintLink AS1329 118 51 67 56.8% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS209 327 265 62 19.0% WESTNET-EAST AS86 344 284 60 17.4% SURANET-AS AS2493 137 77 60 43.8% FONOROLA-EAST --- 20Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1169 622 547 46.8% AlterNet AS174 1375 957 418 30.4% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1093 785 308 28.2% NSN-AMES-AS AS19 635 396 239 37.6% CSS-DOMAIN AS1270 461 245 216 46.9% EUnet/DE AS560 587 419 168 28.6% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 452 328 124 27.4% SURANET-AS-2 AS1275 314 203 111 35.4% DFN-IP AS97 397 289 108 27.2% JVNC-AS AS1250 208 106 102 49.0% SINGAPORE-AS AS271 201 108 93 46.3% BCNET-AS AS2150 190 100 90 47.4% CSUNET-SW AS786 299 218 81 27.1% The JANET IP Service AS1849 278 204 74 26.6% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1955 144 72 72 50.0% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 362 290 72 19.9% SprintLink AS1329 118 51 67 56.8% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS2493 138 76 62 44.9% FONOROLA-EAST AS209 323 261 62 19.2% WESTNET-EAST AS86 343 283 60 17.5% SURANET-AS --- 19Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1133 606 527 46.5% AlterNet AS174 1360 955 405 29.8% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1190 852 338 28.4% NSN-AMES-AS AS19 640 397 243 38.0% CSS-DOMAIN AS1270 461 245 216 46.9% EUnet/DE AS560 585 416 169 28.9% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 492 360 132 26.8% SURANET-AS-2 AS1250 240 119 121 50.4% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 313 202 111 35.5% DFN-IP AS97 401 293 108 26.9% JVNC-AS AS271 197 105 92 46.7% BCNET-AS AS2150 191 101 90 47.1% CSUNET-SW AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1849 275 202 73 26.5% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1955 145 73 72 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 363 291 72 19.8% SprintLink AS568 244 182 62 25.4% SUMNET-AS AS209 324 262 62 19.1% WESTNET-EAST AS2493 138 77 61 44.2% FONOROLA-EAST AS86 341 281 60 17.6% SURANET-AS --- 18Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1164 614 550 47.3% AlterNet AS174 1358 947 411 30.3% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1199 853 346 28.9% NSN-AMES-AS AS19 639 407 232 36.3% CSS-DOMAIN AS1270 467 244 223 47.8% EUnet/DE AS560 584 415 169 28.9% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 497 361 136 27.4% SURANET-AS-2 AS1250 249 122 127 51.0% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 313 202 111 35.5% DFN-IP AS97 400 290 110 27.5% JVNC-AS AS2150 192 99 93 48.4% CSUNET-SW AS271 197 105 92 46.7% BCNET-AS AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1849 275 201 74 26.9% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1955 143 72 71 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 363 292 71 19.6% SprintLink AS568 243 180 63 25.9% SUMNET-AS AS86 340 281 59 17.4% SURANET-AS AS2493 136 77 59 43.4% FONOROLA-EAST AS209 318 259 59 18.6% WESTNET-EAST --- 17Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1161 612 549 47.3% AlterNet AS174 1351 959 392 29.0% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1181 845 336 28.5% NSN-AMES-AS AS19 639 398 241 37.7% CSS-DOMAIN AS1270 466 243 223 47.9% EUnet/DE AS560 583 416 167 28.6% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 490 355 135 27.6% SURANET-AS-2 AS1740 487 361 126 25.9% CERFNET AS1250 242 117 125 51.7% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 313 202 111 35.5% DFN-IP AS97 398 289 109 27.4% JVNC-AS AS271 196 104 92 46.9% BCNET-AS AS2150 189 100 89 47.1% CSUNET-SW AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1849 275 201 74 26.9% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1955 143 72 71 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 363 292 71 19.6% SprintLink AS568 244 180 64 26.2% SUMNET-AS AS209 317 256 61 19.2% WESTNET-EAST AS2493 135 75 60 44.4% FONOROLA-EAST

1 0

More modification to RIPE-81++
by Tony Bates 24 Aug '94

24 Aug '94

Unfortunately, a couple of small changes needed to be made to the RIPE-81++ draft. The changes concern the semantics, ordering and associativity of the logical operators defined for the routing policy expression syntax. My thanks to Cengiz Alaettinoglu at ISI for pointing this out to me. The other change was to make the local-rid and remote-rid fields mandatory in the interas-in/interas-out attributes to avoid ambiguity in the syntax. This I hope to be the last change before the RIPE meeting. The latest draft is available as: URL ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/drafts/ripe-81++.ps URL ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/drafts/ripe-81++.txt I will not include a copy of the text this time ;-). Please also note I will send a very brief summary of changes document out on Friday to help focus discussion at the RIPE meeting. --Tony.

1 0

Latest and final draft of ripe-81++
by Tony Bates 22 Aug '94

22 Aug '94

Please find below the last draft of ripe-81++ to be issued before the RIPE meeting. The changes are only slight but include some comments from Kannan Varadhan sent direclty to me and a further slight clarification to the interas-in/interas-out text as well as the Table of Contents being updated to be correct. I intened to send out a seperate `short' document summarising the major changes from the last meeting and also highlighting any currently open issues to focus the discussion at the forthcoming RIPE meeting. As usual the draft is available as: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/drafts/ripe-81++.{ps,txt} Regards, --Tony. Representation of IP Routing Policies in a Routing Registry (ripe-81++) DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Tony Bates Elise Gerich Laurent Joncheray Jean-Michel Jouanigot Daniel Karrenberg Marten Terpstra Jessica Yu Document-ID: ripe-1nn Obsoletes: ripe-81 August, 1994 ABSTRACT This document is an update to the original `ripe- 81'[1] proposal for representing and storing routing polices within the RIPE database. It incorporates several extensions proposed by Merit Inc.[2] and gives details of a generalised IP routing policy representa- tion to be used by all Internet routing registries. It acts as both tutorial and provides details of database objects and attributes that use and make up a routing registry. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 2 - Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................ 3 2 Organisation of this Document ............................... 3 3 General Representation of Policy Information ................ 4 4 The Routing Registry and the RIPE Database .................. 10 5 The Route Object ............................................ 14 6 The Autonomous System Object ................................ 23 7 The AS Macro Object ......................................... 30 8 The Community Object ........................................ 31 9 Representation of Routing Policies .......................... 34 10 Future Extensions .......................................... 43 11 References ................................................. 45 12 Authors Addresses .......................................... 46 Appendix A - Syntax for the "aut-num" object .................. 48 Appendix B - Syntax for the "community" object ................ 57 Appendix C - Syntax for the "as-macro" object ................. 61 Appendix D - Syntax for the "route" object .................... 65 Appendix E - List of reserved words ........................... 69 Appendix F - Motivations for RIPE-81++ ........................ 70 Appendix G - Transition strategy .............................. 72 ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 3 - 1. Introduction This document is a much revised version of the RIPE routing registry document known as ripe-81[1]. Since its inception in February, 1993 and the establishment of the RIPE routing registry, several addi- tions and clarifications have come to light which can be better presented in a single updated document rather than separate addenda. Some of the text remains the same the as the original ripe-81 docu- ment keeping its tutorial style mixed with details of the RIPE data- base objects relating to routing policy representation. However this document does not repeat the background and historical remarks in ripe-81. For these please refer to the original document. It should be noted that whilst this document specifically references the RIPE database and the RIPE routing registry one can easily read "Regional routing registry" in place of RIPE as this representation is certainly general and flexible enough to be used outside of the RIPE community incorporating many ideas and features from other routing registries in this update. As you can see this document has a new RIPE document identification number but can also be referred to as ripe-81++. Appendix F summar- ises the changes from ripe-81 plus the motivation for these changes. We would like to acknowledge many people for help with this docu- ment. Specifically, Peter Lothberg who was a co-author of the ori- ginal ripe-81 document for his many ideas and Gilles Farrache. We would also like to thank the RIPE routing working group for their review and comment. Finally, we like to thank Merit Inc. for many constructive comments and ideas and making the routing registry a worldwide Internet service. We would also like to acknowledge the funding provided by the PRIDE project run in conjunction with the RARE Technical Program, RIPE and the RIPE NCC without which this paper would not have been possible. 2. Organisation of this Paper This paper acts as both a basic tutorial for understanding routing policy and provides details of objects and attributes used within an Internet routing registry to store routing policies. Section 3 describes general issues about IP routing policies and their representation in routing registries. Experienced readers may wish to skip this section. Section 4 provides an overview of the RIPE database, its basic concepts, schema and objects which make up the database itself. It highlights the way in which the RIPE database splits routing information from allocation information. Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8 detail all the objects associated with routing policy representation. Section 9 gives a fairly extensive "walk through" of how these objects are used for expressing routing policy and the general principles behind their use. Section 10 provides a list of references used throughout this document. Appendix A, B, C and D document the formal syntax for the database objects and attributes. Appendix F details the main changes from ripe-81 and motivations for these changes. Appendix G tackles the issues of transition from ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 4 - ripe-81 to ripe-81++. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 5 - 3. General Representation of Policy Information Networks, Network Operators and Autonomous Systems Throughout this document an effort is made to be consistent with terms so as not to confuse the reader. When we talk about "networks" we mean physical networks which have a unique classless IP network number: Layer 3 entities. We do not mean organisations. We call the organisations operating networks "network operators". For the sake of the examples we divide network operators into two categories: "service providers" and "customers". A "service pro- vider" is a network operator who operates a network to provide Internet services to different organisations, its "customers". The distinction between service providers and customers is not clear cut. A national research networking organisation frequently acts as a service provider to Universities and other academic organisations, but in most cases it buys international connectivity from another service provider. A University networking department is a customer of the research networking organisation but in turn may regard University departments as its customers. An Autonomous System (AS) is a group of IP networks having a single clearly defined routing policy which is run by one or more network operators. Inside ASes IP packets are routed using one or more Inte- rior Routing Protocols (IGPs). In most cases interior routing deci- sions are based on metrics derived from technical parameters like topology, link speeds and load(1). ASes exchange routing information with other ASes using Exterior Routing Protocols (EGPs). Exterior routing decisions are frequently based on policy based rules rather than purely on technical parame- ters. Tools are needed to configure complex policies and to commun- icate those policies between ASes while still ensuring proper opera- tion of the Internet as a whole. Some EGPs like BGP-3 [8] and BGP-4 [9] provide tools to filter routing information according to policy rules and more. None of them provides a mechanism to publish or com- municate the policies themselves. Yet this is critical for opera- tional coordination and fault isolation among network operators and thus for the operation of the global Internet as a whole. This document describes a "Routing Registry" providing this functional- ity. _________________________ (1) The entity we refer to as an AS is frequently and more generally called a routing domain with the AS just being an implementation vehicle. We have decided to use the term AS exclusively because it relates more direct- ly with the database objects and routing tools. By us- ing only one term we hope to reduce the number of con- cepts and to avoid confusion. The academically inclined reader may forgive us. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 6 - Routing Policies The exchange of routing information between ASes is subject to rout- ing policies. Consider the case of two ASes, X and Y exchanging routing information: NET1 ...... ASX <---> ASY ....... NET2 ASX knows how to reach a network called NET1. It does not matter whether NET1 is belonging to ASX or some other AS which exchanges routing information with ASX either directly or indirectly; we just assume that ASX knows how to direct packets towards NET1. Likewise ASY knows how to reach NET2. In order for traffic from NET2 to NET1 to flow between ASX and ASY, ASX has to announce NET1 to ASY using an external routing protocol. This states that ASX is willing to accept traffic directed to NET1 from ASY. Policy thus comes into play first in the decision of ASX to announce NET1 to ASY. In addition ASY has to accept this routing information and use it. It is ASY's privilege to either use or disregard the information that ASX is willing to accept traffic for NET1. ASY might decide not to use this information if it does not want to send traffic to NET1 at all or if it considers another route more appropriate to reach NET1. So in order for traffic in the direction of NET1 to flow between ASX and ASY, ASX must announce it to ASY and ASY must accept it from ASX: resulting packet flow towards NET1 <<=================================== | | announce NET1 | accept NET1 --------------> + -------------> | AS X | AS Y | <------------- + <-------------- accept NET2 | announce NET2 | | resulting packet flow towards NET2 ===================================>> Ideally, and seldom practically, the announcement and acceptance policies of ASX and ASY are identical. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 7 - In order for traffic towards NET2 to flow, announcement and accep- tance of NET2 must be in place the other way round. For almost all applications connectivity in just one direction is not useful at all. It is important to realise that with current destination based for- warding technology routing policies must eventually be expressed in these terms. It is relatively easy to formulate reasonable policies in very general terms which CANNOT be expressed in terms of announc- ing and accepting networks. With current technology such policies are almost always impossible to implement. Usually policies are not configured for each network separately but for groups of networks. In practise these groups are almost always defined by the networks forming one or more ASes. Routing Policy limitations The generic example of a reasonable but un-implementable routing is a split of already joined packet streams based on something other than destination address. Once traffic for the same destination network passes the same router, or the same AS at our level of abstraction, it will take exactly the same route to the destina- tion(2). In a concrete example AS Z might be connected to the outside world by two links. AS Z wishes to reserve these links for different kinds of traffic, let's call them black and white traffic. For this purpose the management of AS Z keeps two lists of ASes, the black and the white list. Together these lists comprise all ASes in the world reachable from AS Z. "W" <---> ... AS Z .... NET 3 <---> "B" It is quite possible to implement the policy for traffic originating in AS Z: AS Z will only accept announcements for networks in white ASes on the white link and will only accept announcements for net- works in black ASes on the black link. This causes traffic from networks within AS Z towards white ASes to use the white link and likewise traffic for black ASes to use the black link. Note that this way of implementing things makes it necessary to decide on the colour of each new AS which appears before traffic can be sent to it from AS Z. A way around this would be to accept only _________________________ (2) Disregarding special cases like "type of service" routing, load sharing and routing instabilities. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 8 - white announcements via the white link and to accept all but white announcements on the black link. That way traffic from new ASes would automatically be sent down the black link and AS Z management would only need to keep the list of white ASes rather than two lists. Now for the unimplementable part of the policy. This concerns traffic towards AS Z. Consider the following topology: B AS ---) "W" W AS ---) ---> B AS ---)>> AS A ---> ... AS Z .... NET 3 B AS ---) ---> W AS ---) "B" As seen from AS Z there are both black and white ASes "behind" AS A. Since ASes can make routing decisions based on destination only, AS A and all ASes between AS A and the two links connecting AS Z can only make the same decision for traffic directed at a network in AS Z, say NET 3. This means that traffic from both black and white ASes towards NET 3 will follow the same route once it passes through AS A. This will either be the black or the white route depending on the routing policies of AS A and all ASes between it and AS Z. The important thing to note is that unless routing and forwarding decisions can be made based on both source and destination addresses, policies like the "black and white" example cannot be implemented in general because "once joined means joined forever". Access Policies Access policies contrary to routing policies are not necessarily defined in terms of ASes. The very simplest type of access policy is to block packets from a specific network S from being forwarded to another network D. A common example is when some inappropriate use of resources on network D has been made from network S and the prob- lem has not been resolved yet. Other examples of access policies might be resources only accessible to networks belonging to a par- ticular disciplinary group or community of interest. While most of these policies are better implemented at the host or application level, network level access policies do exist and are a source of connectivity problems which are sometimes hard to diagnose. There- fore they should also be documented in the routing registry accord- ing to similar requirements as outlined above. Routing vs. Allocation information The RIPE database contains both routing registry and address space allocation registry information. In the past the database schema combined this information. Because RIPE was tasked with running both an allocation and routing registry it seemed natural to initially ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 9 - combine these functions. However, experience has shown that a clear separation of routing information from allocation is desirable. Often the maintainer of the routing information is not the same as the maintainer of the allocation information. Moreover, in other parts of the world there are different registries for each kind of information. Whilst the actual routing policy objects will be introduced in the next section it is worthy of note that a transition from the current objects will be required. Appendix G details the basic step of such a transition. This split in information represents a significant change in the representational model of the RIPE database. Appendix F expands on the reasons for this a little more. Tools The network operators will need a series of tools for policy rout- ing. Some tools are already available to perform some of the tasks. Most notably, the PRIDE tools [3] from the PRIDE project started in September 1993 as well as others produced by Merit Inc [4] and CERN [5]. These tools will enable them to use the routing policy stored in the RIPE routing registry to perform such tasks as check actual routing against policies defined, ensure consistency of policies set by dif- ferent operators, and simulate the effects of policy changes. Work continues on producing more useful tools to service the Inter- net community. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 10 - 4. The Routing Registry and the RIPE Database One of the activities of RIPE is to maintain a database of Euro- pean IP networks, DNS domains and their contact persons along with various other kinds of network management information. The database content is public and can be queried using the whois protocol as well as retrieved as a whole. This supports NICs/NOCs all over Europe and beyond to perform their respective tasks. The RIPE database combines both allocation registry and routing registry functions. The RIPE allocation registry contains data about address space allocated to specific enterprises and/or delegated to local registries as well as data about the domain name space. The allocation registry is described in separate documents [6,7] and outside the scope of this document. Database Objects Each object in the database describes a single entity in the real world. This basic principle means that information about that entity should only be represented in the corresponding data- base object and not be repeated in other objects. The whois ser- vice can automatically display referenced objects where appropriate. The types of objects stored in the RIPE database are summarised in the table below: R Object Describes References ____________________________________________________________________ B person contact persons A inetnum IP address space person A domain DNS domain person R aut-num autonomous system person (aut-num,community) R as-macro a group of autonomous systems person, aut-num R community community person R route a route being announced aut-num, community R clns CLNS address space and routing person The first column indicates whether the object is part of the alloca- tion registry (A), the routing registry (R) or both (B). The last column indicates the types of objects referenced by the particular type of object. It can be seen that almost all objects reference contact persons. Objects are described by attributes value pairs, one per line. Objects are separated by empty lines. An attribute that consists ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 11 - of multiple lines should have the attribute name repeated on consecutive lines. The information stored about network 192.87.45.0 consists of three objects, one inetnum object and two person objects and looks like this: inetnum: 192.87.45.0 netname: RIPE-NCC descr: RIPE Network Coordination Centre descr: Amsterdam, Netherlands country: NL admin-c: Daniel Karrenberg tech-c: Marten Terpstra rev-srv: ns.ripe.net rev-srv: ns.eu.net notify: ops(a)ripe.net changed: tony(a)ripe.net 940110 source: RIPE person: Daniel Karrenberg address: RIPE Network Coordination Centre (NCC) address: Kruislaan 409 address: NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam address: Netherlands phone: +31 20 592 5065 fax-no: +31 20 592 5090 e-mail: dfk(a)ripe.net nic-hdl: DK58 changed: ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net 920826 source: RIPE person: Marten Terpstra address: RIPE Network Coordination Centre (NCC) address: PRIDE Project address: Kruislaan 409 address: NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam address: Netherlands phone: +31 20 592 5064 fax-no: +31 20 592 5090 e-mail: Marten.Terpstra(a)ripe.net nic-hdl: MT2 notify: marten(a)ripe.net changed: marten(a)ripe.net 931230 source: RIPE Objects are stored and retrieved in this tag/value format. The RIPE NCC does not provide differently formatted reports because any desired format can easily be produced from this generic one. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 12 - Routing Registry Objects The main objects comprising the routing registry are "aut-num" and "route", describing an autonomous system and a route respectively. It should be noted that routes not described in the routing registry should never be routed in the Internet itself. The autonomous system (aut-num) object provides contact information for the AS and describes the routing policy of that AS. The routing policy is described by enumerating all neighbouring ASes with which routing information is exchanged. For each neighbour the routing policy is described in terms of exactly what is being sent (announced) and allowed in (accepted). It is important to note that this is exactly the part of the global policy over which an AS has direct control. Thus each aut-num object describes what can indeed be implemented and enforced locally by the AS concerned. Combined together all the aut-num objects provide the global routing graph and permit to deduce the exact routing policy between any two ASes. While the aut-num objects describe how routing information is pro- pagated, the route object describes a single route injected into the external routing mesh. The route object references the AS injecting (originating) the route and thereby indirectly provides contact information for the originating AS. This reference also provides the primary way of grouping routes into larger collections. This is necessary because describing routing policy on the level of single routes would be awkward to impractical given the number of routes in the Internet which is about 20,000 at the time of this writing. Thus routing policy is most often defined for groups of routes by originating AS. This method of grouping is well supported by current exterior routing protocols. The route object also refer- ences community objects described below to provide another method of grouping routes. Modification of aut-num object itself and the referencing by route objects is strictly protected to provide net- work operators control over the routing policy description and the routes originated by their ASes. Sometimes even keeping track of groups of routes at the AS level is cumbersome. Consider the case of policies described at the transit provider level which apply transitively to all customers of the transit provider. Therefore another level of grouping is provided by the as-macro object which provides groups of ASes which can be referenced in routing policies just like single ASes. Membership of as-macro groups is also strictly controlled. Sometimes there is a need to group routes on different criteria than ASes for purposes like statistics or local access policies. This is provided by the community object. A community object is much like an AS but without a routing policy. It just describes a group of routes. This is not supported at all by exterior routing protocols and depending on aggregation of routes may not be generally usable to define routing policies. It is suitable for local policies and non-routing related purposes. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 13 - These routing related objects will be described in detail in the sections below. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 14 - 5. The Route Object As stated in the previous chapter routing and address space alloca- tion information are now clearly separated. This is performed with the introduction of the route object. The route object will contain all the information regarding a routing announcement. All routing related attributes are removed from the inetnum object. Some old attributes are obsoleted: connect, routpr-l, bdryg-l, nsf- in, nsf-out, gateway). The currently useful routing attributes are moved to the route object: aut-sys becomes origin, ias-int will be encoded as part of the inet-rtr [15] object and comm-list simply moves. See [6] for detail of the "inetnum" object definition. The information in the old inetnum object inetnum: 192.87.45.0 netname: RIPE-NCC descr: RIPE Network Coordination Centre descr: Amsterdam, Netherlands country: NL admin-c: Daniel Karrenberg tech-c: Marten Terpstra connect: RIPE NSF WCW aut-sys: AS3333 comm-list: SURFNET ias-int: 192.87.45.80 AS1104 ias-int: 192.87.45.6 AS2122 ias-int: 192.87.45.254 AS2600 rev-srv: ns.ripe.net rev-srv: ns.eu.net notify: ops(a)ripe.net changed: tony(a)ripe.net 940110 source: RIPE will be distributed over two objects: ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 15 - inetnum: 192.87.45.0 netname: RIPE-NCC descr: RIPE Network Coordination Centre descr: Amsterdam, Netherlands country: NL admin-c: Daniel Karrenberg tech-c: Marten Terpstra rev-srv: ns.ripe.net rev-srv: ns.eu.net notify: ops(a)ripe.net changed: tony(a)ripe.net 940110 source: RIPE route: 192.87.45.0/24 descr: RIPE Network Coordination Centre origin: AS3333 comm-list: SURFNET changed: dfk(a)ripe.net 940427 source: RIPE The route object is used to represent a single route originated into the Internet routing mesh. The actual syntax is given in Appendix D. However, there are several important aspects of the attributes worthy of note. The value of the route attribute will be a classless address. It represents the exact route being injected into the routing mesh. The representation of classless addresses is described in [10]. The value of the origin attribute will be an AS reference of the form AS1234 referring to an aut-num object. It represents the AS injecting this route into the routing mesh. The "aut-num" object (see below) thus referenced provides all the contact information for this route. Special cases: There can only be a single originating AS in each route object. However in todays Internet sometimes a route is injected by more than one AS. This situation is potentially dangerous as it can create conflicting routing policies for that route and requires coordination between the originating ASes. In the routing registry this is represented by multiple route objects. This is a departure from the one route (net), one AS principle of the ripe-81 routing registry. The consequences for the different tools based in the routing registry will need to be evaluated and possibly additional consistency checking of the database is needed. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 16 - The examples below will illustrate the usage of the route object further. Suppose three chunks of address space of 2 different enterprises represented by the following inetnum objects: Examples inetnum: 193.0.1.0 netname: ENT-1 descr: Enterprise 1 ... inetnum: 193.0.8.0 netname: ENT-2 descr: Enterprise 2 ... inetnum: 193.0.9.0 netname: ENT-2-SPEC descr: Enterprise 2 ... Supposing that the Enterprises have their own AS numbers straight application of routing without aggregation would yield: route: 193.0.1.0/24 descr: Enterprise 1 origin: AS1 ... route: 193.0.8.0/24 descr: Enterprise 2 origin: AS2 ... route: 193.0.9.0/24 descr: Enterprise 2 origin: AS2 ... NB: This representation can be achieved by straight translation from the ripe-81 representation. See Appendix G for more details. Homogeneous Aggregation The two chunks of address space of Enterprise 2 can be represented by one aggregate route turning two route objects into one and poten- tially saving routing table space for one route. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 17 - route: 193.0.8.0/23 descr: Enterprise 2 origin: AS2 ... Note that AS2 can also decide to originate all routes mentioned so far, two 24-bit prefixes and one 23-bit prefix. This case would be represented by storing all three route objects in the database. In this particular example the additional routes will not add any func- tionality however and only increase the amount of routes announced unnecessarily. Heterogeneous Aggregation Consider the following case however: route: 193.0.8.0/24 descr: Enterprise 2 origin: AS2 ... route: 193.0.9.0/24 descr: Enterprise 2 / Special origin: AS2 comm-list: SPECIAL ... Now the prefix 193.0.9.0/24 belongs to community SPECIAL (this com- munity may well not be relevant to routing) and the other prefix originated by AS2 does not. If AS2 aggregates these prefixes into the 193.0.8.0/23 prefix, routing policies based on the community value SPECIAL cannot be implemented in general, because there is no way to distinguish between the special and the not-so-special parts of AS2. If another AS has the policy to accept only routes to members of community SPECIAL it cannot implement it, because accept- ing the route to 193.0.8.0/23 would also route to 193.0.8.0/24 and not accepting this route would lose connectivity to the special part 193.0.9.0/24. We call aggregate routes consisting of components belonging to different communities or even different ASes "hetero- geneous aggregates". The problems introduced with heterogeneous aggregates are that once the homogeneous routes are withdrawn one cannot tell if a more specific part of the heterogeneous has a different policy. However, if can be counter argued that knowing this policy is of little use if you cannot implement a routing policy based on the less specific (and only route present) heterogeneous aggregate. In fact, this displays a facet of CIDR itself in that one may actually compromise slight variations on policy over announcing a larger (albeit ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 18 - heterogeneous in terms of policy) aggregate to save address space. However, it is still useful to be able to document these variations in policy especially when this homogeneous more specific route is just being withdrawn. For this one can use the "withdrawn" attri- bute. The withdrawn attribute can serve to both indicate that a less specific aggregate is in fact heterogeneous and also allow the gen- eral documenting of route withdrawal. So there has to be a way for AS2 to document this even if it does not originate the route to 193.0.9.0/24 any more. This can be done with the "withdrawn" attribute of the route object. The aggregate route to 193.0.8.0/23 is now be registered as: route: 193.0.8.0/23 descr: Enterprise 2 origin: AS2 ... With the two homogeneous routes marked as withdrawn from the Inter- net routing mesh but still preserving their original routing infor- mation. route: 193.0.8.0/24 descr: Enterprise 2 origin: AS2 withdrawn: 940701 ... route: 193.0.9.0/24 descr: Enterprise 2 / Special origin: AS2 comm-list: SPECIAL withdrawn: 940701 ... It should be noted that the date value used in the withdrawn attri- bute can only be in the past. Proxy Aggregation The next step of aggregation are aggregates consisting of more than one AS. This generally means one AS is aggregating on behalf of another. It is called proxy aggregation. Proxy aggregation should be done with great care and always be coordinated with other providers announcing the same route. Consider the following: ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 19 - route: 193.0.0.0/20 descr: All routes known by AS1 in a single package origin: AS1 ... route: 193.0.1.0/24 descr: Foo origin: AS1 withdrawn: 940310 ... route: 193.0.8.0/24 descr: Bar origin: AS2 withdrawn: 940310 ... route: 193.0.9.0/24 descr: Bar-2 origin: AS2 withdrawn: 940310 comm-list: SPECIAL ... If AS1 announced no other routes to a single homed neighbouring AS, that neighbour can in general either take that route or leave it but not differentiate between AS1 and AS2. Note: If the neighbor was previously configured to accept routes originating in AS2 but not in AS1 they lose connectivity to AS2 as well. This means that proxy aggregation has to be done carefully and in a well coordinated fashion. The information in the withdrawn route object can help to achieve that. Aggregates with Holes If we assume that the world of our example still consists of only three chunks of address space the aggregate above contains what are called holes, parts of an aggregate that are not reachable via the originator of the route. From the routing information itself one cannot tell whether these are holes and what part of the route falls inside one. The only way to tell is to send a packet there and see ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 20 - whether it gets to the destination, or an ICMP message is received back, or there is silence. On the other hand announcing aggregates with holes is quite legitimate. Consider a 16-bit aggregate with only one 24-bit prefix unreachable. The savings in routing table size by far outweigh the hole problem. For operational reasons however it is very useful to register these holes in the routing registry. Consider the case where a remote net- work operator experiences connectivity problems to addresses inside an aggregate route. If the packets are getting to the AS announcing the aggregate and there are no more specific routes, the normal cause of action is to get in touch with the originating AS of the aggregate route and ask them to fix the problem. If the address falls into a hole this is futile. Therefore problem diagnosis can be sped up and unnecessary calls prevented by registering the holes in the routing registry. We do this by using the "hole" attribute. In our example the representation would be: route: 193.0.0.0/20 descr: All routes known by AS1 origin: AS1 hole: 193.0.0.0/24 hole: 193.0.2.0/23 hole: 193.0.4.0/22 hole: 193.0.10.0/23 hole: 193.0.12.0/22 ... Note: there would also be two routes with the withdrawn attribute as displayed above (i.e. 193.0.8.0/24 and 193.0.9.0/24) Multiple Proxy Aggregation Finally suppose that AS2 decides to announce the same aggregate, they would add the following route object to the registry: route: 193.0.0.0/20 descr: All routes known by AS2 origin: AS2 hole: 193.0.0.0/24 hole: 193.0.2.0/23 hole: 193.0.4.0/22 hole: 193.0.10.0/23 hole: 193.0.12.0/22 ... As per the update procedures below both AS1 and AS2 will be notified that there already is a route to the same prefix in the registry. This multiple proxy aggregation is very dangerous to do if the sub- ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 21 - aggregates of the route are not the same. It is still dangerous when the sub-aggregates are consistent but connectivity to the sub- aggregates varies widely between the originators. Route object update procedures Adding a route object will be have to be authorised by the guardian of the originating AS. The actual implementation of this is outside the scope of this document. This guarantees that an AS guardian has full control over the registration of the routes it announces. What is an Inter-AS network ? An inter-AS network(3) exists for the purpose of passing traffic and routing information between different autonomous systems. The most simple example of an inter-AS network is a point-to-point link, con- necting exactly two ASes. Each end of such a link is connected to an interface of router belonging to each of the autonomous systems. More complex examples are broadcast type networks with multiple interfaces connecting multiple ASes with the possibility of more than one connection per AS. Consider the following example of three routers 1, 2 and 3 with interfaces a through f connected by two inter-AS networks X and Y: X Y a1b --- c2d --- e3f Suppose that network X is registered in the routing registry as part of AS1 and net Y as part of AS3. If traffic passes from left to right prtraceroute will report the following sequence of interfaces and ASes: a in AS1 c in AS1 e in AS3 The traceroute algorithm enumerates only the receiving interfaces on the way to the destination. In the example this leads to the pas- sage of AS2 going unnoticed. This is confusing to the user and will also generate exceptions when the path found is checked against the routing registry. _________________________ (3) Inter-AS IP networks are those networks are currently called FIXes, IXFs, DMZs, NAPs, GIX and many other acronyms. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 22 - For operational monitoring tools such as prtraceroute it is neces- sary to know which interface on an inter-AS network belongs to which AS. If AS information is not known about interfaces on an inter-AS network, tools like prtraceroute cannot determine correctly which ASes are being traversed. All interfaces on inter-AS networks will are described in a separate object know as the `inet-rtr' object [15]. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 23 - 6. The Autonomous System Object Autonomous Systems An Autonomous System (AS) is a group of IP networks run by one or more network operators which has a single and clearly defined rout- ing policy. An AS has a unique number associated with it which is used both in exchange of exterior routing information and as an identifier of the AS itself. Exterior routing protocols such as BGP and EGP are used to exchange routing information between ASes. In routing terms an AS will normally use one or more interior gate- way protocols (IGPs) in conjunction with some sort of common agreed metrics when exchanging network information within its own AS. The term AS is often confused or even misused as a convenient way of grouping together a set of networks which belong under the same administrative umbrella even if within that group of networks there are various different routing policies. We provide the "community" concept for such use. ASes can strictly have only one single rout- ing policy. The creation of an AS should be done in a conscious and well coordi- nated manner to avoid creating ASes for the sake of it, perhaps resulting in the worst case scenario of one AS per routing announce- ment. It should be noted that there is a limited number of AS numbers available. Also creating an AS may well increase the number of AS paths modern EGPs will have to keep track of. This aggravates what is known as "the routing table growth problem". This may mean that by applying the general rules for the creation and allocation of an AS below, some re-engineering may well be needed. However, this may be the only way to actually implement the desired routing policy anyway. The creation and allocation of an AS should be done with the following recommendations in mind: o Creation of an AS is only required when exchanging routing information with other ASes. Some router implementations make use of an AS number as a form of tagging to identify the rout- ing process. However, it should be noted that this tag does not need to be unique unless routing information is indeed exchanged with other ASes. o For a simple case of customer networks connected to a single service provider, the IP network should normally be a member of the service providers AS. In terms of routing policy the IP network has exactly the same policy as the service provider and there is no need to make any distinction in routing informa- tion. This idea may at first seem slightly alien to some, but it highlights the clear distinction in the use of the AS number ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 24 - as a representation of routing policy as opposed to some form of administrative use. o If a network operator connects to more than one AS with dif- ferent routing policies then they need to create their own AS. In the case of multi-homed customer networks connected to two service providers there are at least two different routing pol- icies to a given customer network. At this point the customer networks will be part of a single AS and this AS would be dis- tinct from either of the service providers ASes. This allows the customer the ability of having a different representation of policy and preference to the different service providers. This is the ONLY case where a network operator should create its own AS number. o As a general rule one should always try to populate the AS with as many routes as possible, providing all routes conform to the same routing policy. Each AS is represented in the RIPE database by both an AS object and the route objects representing the routes originated by the AS. The AS object stores descriptive, administrative and contact information about the AS as well as the routing policies of the AS in relation to all neighbouring ASes. The origin attributes of the route objects define the set of routes originated by the AS. Each route object can have exactly one origin attribute. Route objects can only be created and updated by the "guardian" of the AS and not by those immediately responsible for the particular routes referenced therein. This ensures that opera- tors, especially service providers, remain in control of AS routing announcements. The AS object itself is used to represent a description of adminis- trative details and the routing policies of the AS itself. The AS object definition is depicted as follows. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 25 - Example: aut-num: AS1104 descr: NIKHEF-H Autonomous system as-in: from AS1213 100 accept AS1213 as-in: from AS1913 100 accept AS1913 as-in: from AS1755 150 accept ANY as-out: to AS1213 announce ANY as-out: to AS1913 announce ANY as-out: to AS1755 announce AS1104 AS1913 AS1213 tech-c: Rob Blokzijl admin-c: Eric Wassenaar guardian: as-guardian(a)nikhef.nl changed: ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net 920910 source: RIPE See Appendix A for a complete syntax definition of the "aut-num" object. It should be noted that this representation provides two things: o a set of routes. o a description of administrative details and routing policies. The set of routes can be used to generate network list based confi- guration information as well as configuration information for exte- rior routing protocols knowing about ASes. This means an AS can be defined and is useful even if it does not use routing protocols which know about the AS concept. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 26 - Description of routing policies between ASs with multiple connec- tions - "interas-in/interas-out" Description of multiple connections between ASs defines how two ASs have chosen to set different policies for the use of each or some of the connections between the ASs. This description is necessary only if the ASs are connected in more than one way and the routing policy and differs at these two connections. Example: LINK1 193.0.1.1 +----------+ 193.0.1.2 | | AS1------AS2== ==AS3-----AS4 | | 193.0.1.5 +----------+ 193.0.1.6 LINK2 Note: LINK here denotes to connection points between ASs. It is not necessary just a serial link as it may be inter- preted. It could be ethernet or other type of connection as well. It may be that AS2 wants to use LINK2 only for traffic towards AS4. LINK1 is used for traffic to AS3 and as backup to AS4, should LINK2 fail. To implement this policy, one would use the attribute "interas-in" and "interas-out." This attribute permits ASs to describe their local decisions based on its preference such as multi-exit-discriminators (MEDs) as used in some inter-domain rout- ing protocols (BGP4, IDRP) and to communicate those routing deci- sions. This information would be useful in resolving problems when some traffic paths changed from traversing AS3's gateway in Timbuktu rather than the gateway in Mogadishu. The exact syntax is given in Appendix A. However, if we follow this example through in terms of AS2 we would represent this policy as follows: Example: aut-num: AS2 as-in: from AS3 10 accept AS3 AS4 as-out: to AS3 announce AS1 AS2 interas-in: from AS3 193.0.1.1/32 193.0.1.2/32 (pref=5) accept AS3 interas-in: from AS3 193.0.1.1/32 193.0.1.2/32 (pref=15) accept AS4 interas-in: from AS3 193.0.1.5/32 193.0.1.6/32 (pref=10) accept AS4 ... ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 27 - Here we see additional policy information between two ASs in terms of the IP addresses of the connection. The parentheses and keyword are syntactic placeholders to add the readability of the attributes. If pref=MED is specified the preference indicated by the remote AS via the multi-exit- discriminator metric such as BGP is used. Of course this type on inter-AS policy should always be bilaterally agreed upon to avoid asymmetry and in practice there may need to be corresponding interas-in attributes in the policy representation of AS3. The interas-out attribute is similar in the same way to interas-in as as-out to as-in. The one major difference being that interas-out allows to associate an outgoing metric with each route. It is impor- tant to note that this metric is just passed to the peer AS and it is at the peer AS's discretion to use or ignore it. A special value of IGP specifies that the metric passed to the receiving AS will be derived from the IGP of the sending AS. In this way the peer AS can choose the optimal link for its traffic as determined by the sending AS. Descriptions of interas policies do not replace the global pol- icy described in as-in, as-out and other policy attributes which should be specified too. If the global policy mentions more routes than the local policy then local preferences for these routes are assumed to be equal for all links. Any route specified in interas-in/out but not specified in as-in/out is assumed not accepted/announced between the ASes concerned. Diag- nostic tools should flag this inconsistency as an error. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 28 - How to describe the exclusion policy of a certain AS - "as-exclude" Some ASes have a routing policy based on the exclusion of certain routes if for whatever reason a certain AS is used as transit. Whilst, this is in general not good practice as it makes implicit assumptions on topology with asymmetry a possible outcome if not coordinated, this case needs to be accommodated within the routing policy representation. The way this is achieved is by making use of the "as-exclude" attri- bute. The precise syntax of this attribute can be found in Appendix A along with the rest of the defined syntax for the "aut-num" object. However, some explanation of the use of this attribute is useful. If we have the following example topology. Example: AS4--------AS3 | | | | | | AS1--------AS2--------AS5 With a simple corresponding policy like so: Example: aut-num: AS1 as-in: from AS2 100 accept ANY as-out: to AS2 announce AS1 as-exclude: exclude AS4 to ANY .... We see an interesting policy. What this says in simple terms is AS1 doesn't want to reach anything if it transits AS4. This can be a perfectly valid policy. However, it should be realised that if for whatever reason AS2 decides to route to AS3 via AS4 then immediately AS1 has no connectivity to AS3 or if AS1 is running default to AS2 packets from AS1 will still flow via AS4. The important point about this is that whilst AS1 can advise its neighbours of its policy it has no direct control on how it can enforce this policy to neigh- bours upstream. Another interesting scenario to highlight the unexpected result of using such an "as-exclude" policy. If we assume in the above example AS2 preferred AS4 to reach AS3 and AS1 did not use default routing then as stated AS1 would have no connectivity to AS3. Now lets sup- pose that for example the link between AS2 and AS4 went down for some reason. Like so: ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 29 - Example: AS4--------AS3 | | AS1--------AS2--------AS5 Suddenly AS1 now has connectivity to AS3. This unexpected behavior should be considered when created policies based on the "as-exclude" attribute. The second problem with this type of policy is the potential of asymmetry. In the original example we saw the correct policy from AS1's point of view but if ASes with connectivity through AS4 do not use a similar policy you have asymmetric traffic and policy. If an AS uses such a policy they must be aware of the consequences of its use. Namely that the specified routes which transit the AS (i.e. routing announcements with this AS in the AS path information) in question will be excluded. If not coordinated this can easily cause asymmetry or even worse loss of connectivity to unknown ASes behind (or in front for that matter) the transit AS in question. With this in mind this attribute can only be viewed as a form of advisory to other service providers. However, this does not preclude its use with policy based tools if the attribute exists. By having the ability to specify a route keyword based on any of the four notations given in the syntax it allows the receiving AS to specify what routes it wishes to exclude through a given transit AS to a network granularity. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 30 - 7. AS Macros It may be difficult to keep track of each and every new AS that is represented in the routing registry. A convenient way around this is to define an `AS Macro' which essentially is a convenient way to group ASes. This is done so that each and every AS guardian does not have to add a new AS to it's routing policy as described by the as- in and as-out attributes of it's AS object. However, it should be noted that this creates an implicit trust on the guardian of the AS-Macro. An AS-Macro can be used in <routing policy expressions> for the "as-in" and "as-out" attributes in the aut-num object. The AS-Macro object is then used to derive the list or group of ASes. A simple example would be something like: Example: aut-num: AS786 as-in: from AS1755 100 accept AS-EBONE AND NOT AS1104 as-in: from AS1755 100 accept AS-EBONE AND NOT AS1104 as-out to AS1755 announce AS786 ..... Where the as-macro object for AS-EBONE is as follows: as-macro: AS-EBONE descr: ASes routed by EBONE as-list: AS2121 AS1104 AS2600 AS2122 as-list: AS1103 AS1755 AS2043 guardian: guardian(a)ebone.net ...... So the policy would be evaluated to: aut-num: AS786 as-in: from AS1755 100 accept (AS2121 OR AS1104 OR AS2600 OR AS2122 as-in: from AS1755 100 accept AS1103 OR AS1755 OR AS2043) AND NOT AS1104 ...... It should be noted that the above examples incorporates the rule for line wrapping as defined in Appendix A for policy lines. See Appen- dix C for a definition on the AS-Macro syntax. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 31 - 8. The Community Object A community is a group of routes that cannot be represented by an AS or a group of ASes. It is in some circumstances useful to define a group of routes that have something in common. This could be a spe- cial access policy to a supercomputer centre, a group of routes used for a specific mission, or a disciplinary group that is scattered among several autonomous systems. Also these communities could be useful to group routes for the purpose of network statistics. Communities do not exchange routing information, since they do not represent an autonomous system. More specifically, communities do not define routing policies, but access or usage policies. However, they can de used as in conjunction with an ASes routing policy to define a set of routes the AS sets routing policy for. Communities should be defined in a strict manner, to avoid creating as many communities as there are routes, or even worse. Communities should be defined following the two rules below; o Communities must have a global meaning. Communities that have no global meaning, are used only in a local environment and should be avoided. o Communities must not be defined to express non-local policies. It should be avoided that a community is created because some other organisation forces a policy upon your organisation. Communities must only be defined to express a policy defined by your organisation. Community examples There are some clear examples of communities: BACKBONE - all customers of a given backbone service provider even though they can have various different routing policies and hence belong to different ASes. This would be extremely useful for statistics collection. HEPNET - the High Energy Physics community partly shares infrastructure with other organisations, and the institutes it consists of are scattered all over Europe, often being part of a non HEPNET autonomous system. To allow statistics, access or part of a routing policy , a community HEPNET, consisting of all routes that are part of HEPNET, conveniently groups all these routes. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 32 - NSFNET - the National Science Foundation Network imposes an acceptable use policy on routes that wish to make use of it. A community NSFNET could imply the set of routes that comply with this pol- icy. MULTI - a large multinational corporation that does not have its own internal infrastructure, but connects to the various parts of its organisations by using local service providers that connect them all together, may decide to define a community to restrict access to their networks, only by networks that are part of this community. This way a corporate network could be defined on shared infrastructure. Also, this community could be used by any of the service providers to do statistics for the whole of the corporation, for instance to do topology or bandwidth plan- ning. Similar to Autonomous systems, each community is represented in the RIPE database by both a community object and community tags on the route objects representing the routes belonging to the community. The community object stores descriptive, administrative and contact information about the community. The community tags on the route objects define the set of routes belonging to a community. A route can have multiple community tags. The community tags can only be created and updated by the "guardian" of the community and not by those directly responsible for the par- ticular network. This ensures that community guardians remain in control of community membership. Here's an example of how this might be represented in terms of the community tags within the network object. We have an example where the route 192.16.199.0/24 has a single routing policy (i.e. that of AS 1104), but is part of several different communities of interest. We use the tag "comm-list" to represent the list of communities associated with this route. NIKHEF-H uses the service provider SURFNET (a service provider with customers with more than one rout- ing policy), is also part of the High Energy Physics community as well as having the ability to access the Supercomputer at CERN(4). _________________________ (4) The community `CERN-SUPER', is somewhat national, but is intended as an example of a possible use of an access policy constraint. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 33 - Example: route: 192.16.199.0/24 descr: Local Ethernet descr: NIKHEF section H origin: AS1104 comm-list: HEPNET CERN-SUPER SURFNET changed: ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net 920604 source: RIPE In the above examples some communities have been defined. The com- munity object itself will take the following format: Example: community: SURFNET descr: Dutch academic research network authority: SURFnet B.V. guardian: comm-guardian(a)surfnet.nl admin-c: Erik-Jan Bos tech-c: Erik-Jan Bos changed: ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net 920604 source: RIPE For a complete explanation of the syntax please refer to Appendix B. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 34 - 9. Representation of Routing Policies Routing policies of an AS are represented in the autonomous system object. Initially we show some examples, so the reader is familiar with the concept of how routing information is represented, used and derived. Refer to Appendix A, for the full syntax of the "aut-num" object. The topology of routing exchanges is represented by listing how routing information is exchanged with each neighbouring AS. This is done separately for both incoming and outgoing routing information. In order to provide backup and back door paths a relative cost is associated with incoming routing information. Example 1: AS1------AS2 This specifies a simple routing exchange of two presumably isolated ASes. Even if either of them has routing information about routes in ASes other than AS1 and AS2, none of that will be announced to the other. aut-num: AS1 as-out: to AS2 announce AS1 as-in: from AS2 100 accept AS2 aut-num: AS2 as-out: to AS1 announce AS2 as-in: from AS1 100 accept AS1 The number 100 in the in-bound specifications is a relative cost, which is used for backup and back door routes. The absolute value is of no significance. The relation between different values within the same AS object is. A lower value means a lower cost. This is cons- ciously similar to the cost based preference scheme used with DNS MX RRs. Example 2: Now suppose that AS2 is connected to one more AS, besides AS1, and let's call that AS3: AS1------AS2------AS3 ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 35 - In this case there are two reasonable routing policies: a) AS2 just wants to exchange traffic with both AS1 and AS3 itself without passing traffic between AS1 and AS3. b) AS2 is willing to pass traffic between AS3 and AS1, thus acting as a transit AS Example 2a: In the first case AS1's representation in the routing registry will remain unchanged as will be the part of AS2's representation describing the routing exchange with AS1. A description of the addi- tional routing exchange with AS3 will be added to AS2's representa- tion: aut-num: AS1 as-out: to AS2 announce AS1 as-in: from AS2 100 accept AS2 aut-num: AS2 as-out: to AS1 announce AS2 as-in: from AS1 100 accept AS1 as-out: to AS3 announce AS2 as-in: from AS3 100 accept AS3 aut-num: AS3 as-out: to AS2 announce AS3 as-in: from AS2 100 accept AS2 Note that in this example, AS2 keeps full control over its resources. Even if AS3 and AS1 were to allow each others routes in from AS2, the routing information would not flow because AS2 is not announcing it(5). Example 2b: If contrary to the previous case, AS1 and AS3 are supposed to have connectivity to each other via AS2, all AS objects have to change: _________________________ (5) Of course AS1 and AS3 could just send traffic to each other to AS2 even without AS2 announcing the routes, hoping that AS2 will forward it correctly. Such questionable practices however are beyond the scope of this document. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 36 - aut-num: AS1 as-out: to AS2 announce AS1 as-in: from AS2 100 accept AS2 AS3 aut-num: AS2 as-out: to AS1 announce AS2 AS3 as-in: from AS1 100 accept AS1 as-out: to AS3 announce AS2 AS1 as-in: from AS3 100 accept AS3 aut-num: AS3 as-out: to AS2 announce AS3 as-in: from AS2 100 accept AS1 AS2 Note that the amount of routing information exchanged with a neigh- bour AS is defined in terms of routes belonging to ASes. In BGP terms this is the AS where the routing information originates and the originating AS information carried in BGP could be used to implement the desired policy. However, using BGP or the BGP AS-path information is not required to implement the policies thus speci- fied. Configurations based on route lists can easily be generated from the database. The AS path information, provided by BGP can then be used as an additional checking tool as desired. The specification understands one special expression and this can be expressed as a boolean expressions: ANY - means any routing information known. For output this means that all routes an AS knows about are announced. For input it means that anything is accepted from the neighbour AS. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 37 - Example 3: AS4 is a stub customer AS, which only talks to service provider AS123. | | -----AS123------AS4 | | aut-num: AS4 as-out: to AS123 announce AS4 as-in: from AS123 100 accept ANY aut-num: AS123 as-in: from AS4 100 accept AS4 as-out: to AS4 announce ANY <further neighbours> Since AS4 has no other way to reach the outside world than AS123 it is not strictly necessary for AS123 to send routing information to AS4. AS4 can simply send all traffic for which it has no explicit routing information to AS123 by default. This strategy is called default routing. It is expressed in the routing registry by adding one or more default tags to the autonomous system which uses this strategy. In the example above this would look like: aut-num: AS4 as-out: to AS123 announce AS4 default: AS123 100 aut-num: AS123 as-in: from AS4 100 accept AS4 <further neighbours> ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 38 - Example 4: AS4 now connects to a different operator, AS5. AS5 uses AS123 for outside connectivity but has itself no direct connection to AS123. AS5 traffic to and from AS123 thus has to pass AS4. AS4 agrees to act as a transit AS for this traffic. | | -----AS123------AS4-------AS5 | | aut-num: AS4 as-out: to AS123 announce AS4 AS5 as-in: from AS123 100 accept ANY as-out: to AS5 announce ANY as-in: from AS5 50 accept AS5 aut-num: AS5 as-in: from AS4 100 accept ANY as-out: to AS4 announce AS5 aut-num: AS123 as-in: from AS4 100 accept AS4 AS5 as-out: to AS4 announce ANY <further neighbours> Now AS4 has two sources of external routing information. AS5 which provides only information about its own routes and AS123 which pro- vides information about the external world. Note that AS4 accepts information about AS5 from both AS123 and AS5 although AS5 informa- tion cannot come from AS123 since AS5 is connected only via AS4 itself. The lower cost of 50 for the announcement from AS5 itself compared to 100 from AS123 ensures that AS5 is still believed even in case AS123 will unexpectedly announce AS5. In this example too, default routing can be used by AS5 much like in the previous example. AS4 can also use default routing towards AS123: ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 39 - aut-num: AS4 as-out: to AS123 announce AS4 AS5 default: AS123 11 as-in: from AS5 50 accept AS5 Note no announcements to AS5, they default to us. aut-num: AS5 as-out: to AS4 announce AS5 default: AS4 100 aut-num: AS123 as-in: from AS4 100 announce AS4 AS5 <further neighbours> Note that the relative cost associated with default routing is totally separate from the relative cost associated with in-bound announcements. The default route will never be taken if an explicit route is known to the destination. Thus an explicit route can never have a higher cost than the default route. The relative cost asso- ciated with the default route is only useful in those cases where one wants to configure multiple default routes for redundancy. Note also that in this example the configuration using default routes has a subtly different behavior than the one with explicit routes: In case the AS4-AS5 link fails AS4 will send traffic to AS5 to AS123 when using the default configuration. Normally this makes not much difference as there will be no answer and thus little traffic. With certain datagram applications which do not require acknowledgments however, significant amounts of traffic may be use- lessly directed at AS123. Similarly default routing should not be used if there are stringent security policies which proscribe any traffic intended for AS5 to ever touch AS123. Generally it can be said that default routing should only be used in very simple topologies. Once the situation gets more complex using default routes can lead to unexpected results or even defeat the routing policies established when links fail. As an example consider how Example 5a) below could be implemented using default routing. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 40 - Example 5: In a different example AS4 has a private connection to AS6 which in turn is connected to the service provider AS123: | | -----AS123------AS4 | | | | | | AS6 ---------+ There are a number of policies worth examining in this case: a) AS4 and AS6 wish to exchange traffic between themselves exclusively via the private link between themselves; such traffic should never pass through the backbone (AS123). The link should never be used for transit traffic, i.e. traffic not both originating in and destined for AS4 and AS6. b) AS4 and AS6 wish to exchange traffic between themselves via the private link between themselves. Should the link fail, traffic between AS4 and AS6 should be routed via AS123. The link should never be used for transit traffic. c) AS4 and AS6 wish to exchange traffic between themselves via the private link between themselves. Should the link fail, traffic between AS4 and AS6 should be routed via AS123. Should the connection between AS4 and AS123 fail, traffic from AS4 to des- tinations behind AS123 can pass through the private link and AS6's connection to AS123. d) AS4 and AS6 wish to exchange traffic between themselves via the private link between themselves. Should the link fail, traffic between AS4 and AS6 should be routed via AS123. Should the backbone connection of either AS4 or AS6 fail, the traffic of the disconnected AS should flow via the other AS's backbone connection. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 41 - Example 5a: aut-num: AS4 as-in: from AS123 100 accept NOT AS6 as-out: to AS123 announce AS4 as-in: from AS6 50 accept AS6 as-out: to AS6 announce AS4 aut-num: AS123 as-in: from AS4 100 accept AS4 as-out: to AS4 announce ANY as-in: from AS6 100 accept AS6 as-out: to AS6 announce ANY <further neighbours> aut-num: AS6 as-in: from AS123 100 accept NOT AS4 as-out: to AS123 announce AS6 as-in: from AS4 50 accept AS4 as-out: to AS4 announce AS6 Note that here the configuration is slightly inconsistent. AS123 will announce AS6 to AS4 and AS4 to AS6. These announcements will be filtered out on the receiving end. This will implement the desired policy. Consistency checking tools might flag these cases however. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 42 - Example 5b: aut-num: AS4 as-in: from AS123 100 accept ANY as-out: to AS123 announce AS4 as-in: from AS6 50 accept AS6 as-out: AS6 AS4 aut-num: AS123 as-in: AS4 100 AS4 as-out: AS4 ANY as-in: AS6 100 AS6 as-out: AS6 ANY <further neighbours> aut-num: AS6 as-in: from AS123 100 accept ANY as-out: to AS123 announce AS6 as-in: from AS4 50 accept AS4 as-out: to AS4 announce AS6 The thing to note here is that in the ideal operational case, `all links working' AS4 will receive announcements for AS6 from both AS123 and AS6 itself. In this case the announcement from AS6 will be preferred because of its lower cost and thus the private link will be used as desired. AS6 is configured as a mirror image. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 43 - Example 5c: The new feature here is that should the connection between AS4 and AS123 fail, traffic from AS4 to destinations behind AS123 can pass through the private link and AS6's connection to AS123. aut-num: AS4 as-in: from AS123 100 accept ANY as-out: to AS123 announce AS4 as-in: from AS6 50 accept AS6 as-in: from AS6 110 accept ANY as-out: to AS6 AS4 aut-num: AS123 as-in: from AS4 1 accept AS4 as-out: to AS4 announce ANY as-in: from AS6 1 accept AS6 as-in: from AS6 2 accept AS4 as-out: to AS6 announce ANY <further neighbours> aut-num: AS6 as-in: from AS123 100 accept ANY as-out: to AS123 AS6 announce AS4 as-in: from AS4 50 accept AS4 as-out: to AS4 announce ANY Note that it is important to make sure to propagate routing informa- tion for both directions in backup situations like this. Connec- tivity in just one direction is not useful at all for almost all applications. Note also that in case the AS6-AS123 connection breaks, AS6 will only be able to talk to AS4. The symmetrical case (5d) is left as an exercise to the reader. 10. Future Extensions We envision that over time the requirements for describing routing policy will evolve. The routing protocols will evolve to support the requirements and the routing policy description syntax will need to evolve as well. For that purpose, a separate document will describe experimental syntax definitions for policy description. This docu- ment will be updated when new objects or attributes are proposed or modified. Two new attributes of the AS object which are proposed and supported by the Merit Routing Registry are as-transit and db-selector. as-transit describes the transit preferences of an AS. It allows an AS to describe its path preference in order to reach certain ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 44 - destinations. The AS(s) specified in the path preference may or may not be an immediate neighbor of the AS defined in the AS object. as-transit accommodates policy decisions involving AS path whereas as-in and as-out do not. It is not unusual for ASs to have routing policies which involve path selection based on AS. Emerging proto- cols like SDRP [13] will allow an AS to choose a path independent of a neighboring ASs path choice. as-transit permits descriptions based on AS path selection. The DataBase Selector (db-selector) function allows one to take advantage of information registered in other Registries. It permits the selection of networks in a database based on their attributes. It is proposed to be used within the as-in/as-out attribute family to make the description of policy concise. For example, if an AS has the policy of not accepting any routes from country XYZ, the AS can use the db-selector to check a database which has a network and country attribute and relate that information to the information in the routing registry. The advantage of referencing another database is that the routing registry will avoid duplicating the information maintained in other information registries. Detailed examples and syntax are described in document ???? [14]. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 45 - 11. References [1] Bates, T., Jouanigot, J-M., Karrenberg, D., Lothberg, P., Terpstra, M., "Representation of IP Routing Policies in the RIPE Database", RIPE-81, February 1993. [2] Merit Network Inc.,"Representation of Complex Routing Policies of an Autonomous System", DRAFT, March, 1994. [3] PRIDE Tools Release 1. See ftp.ripe.net:pride/tools/pride-tools-1.tar.Z. [4] Merit Inc. RRDB Tools. See rrdb.merit.edu:pub/meritrr/* [5] The Network List Compiler. See dxcoms.cern.ch:pub/ripe-routing-wg/nlc-2.2d.tar [6] Lord, A., Terpstra, M., "RIPE Database Template for Networks and Persons", DRAFT, May 1994. [7] Karrenberg, D., "RIPE Database Template for Domains", RIPE-49, April 1992. [8] Lougheed, K., Rekhter, Y., "A Border Gateway Protocol 3 (BGP- 3)", RFC1267, October 1991. [9] Rekhter, Y., Li, T., "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC-1654, May 1994. [10] Bates, T., Karrenberg, D., Terpstra, M., "Support for Classless Internet Addresses in the RIPE Database", DRAFT, May 1994. [11] Karrenberg, D., "Authorisation and Notification of Changes in the RIPE Database", RIPE-96, October 1993. [12] Bates, T., "Support of Guarded fields within the RIPE Data- base", ripe-108, February 1994. [13] Estrin, D., Li, T., Rekhter, Y., Varadhan, K., Zappala, D., "Source Demand Routing: Packet Format and Forwarding Specifica- tion (Version 1)", INTERNET-DRAFT, draft-ietf-sdr-sdrp-04.txt, March 1994. [14] ?????, "Experimental Objects and attributes for the Routing Registry, ???, ????. [15] Bates, T., "Specifying an `Internet Router' in the Routing Registry", DRAFT, July 1994. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 46 - 12. Author's Addresses Tony Bates RARE/PRIDE Project c/o RIPE Network Coordination Centre Kruislaan 409 NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam The Netherlands +31 20 592 5064 T.Bates(a)ripe.net Elise Gerich The University of Michigan Merit Computer Network 1075 Beal Avenue Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA +1 313 936 2120 epg(a)merit.edu Laurent Joncheray The University of Michigan Merit Computer Network 1075 Beal Avenue Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA +1 313 936 2065 lpj(a)merit.edu Jean-Michel Jouanigot CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics CH-1211 Geneva 23 Switzerland +41 22 767 4417 Jean-Michel.Jouanigot(a)cern.ch Daniel Karrenberg RIPE Network Coordination Centre Kruislaan 409 NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam The Netherlands +31 20 592 5065 D.Karrenberg(a)ripe.net ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 47 - Marten Terpstra PRIDE Project c/o RIPE Network Coordination Centre Kruislaan 409 NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam The Netherlands +31 20 592 5064 M.Terpstra(a)ripe.net Jessica Yu The University of Michigan Merit Computer Network 1075 Beal Avenue Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA +1 313 936 2655 jyy(a)merit.edu ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 48 - Appendix A - Syntax for the aut-num object. Here is a summary of the tags associated with aut-num object itself and their status. The first column specifies the attribute, the second column whether this attribute is mandatory in the aut-num object, and the third column whether this specific attribute can occur only once per object [single], or more than once [multiple]. When specifying multiple lines per attribute, the attribute name must be repeated. See [6] the example for the descr: attribute. aut-num: [mandatory] [single] descr: [mandatory] [multiple] as-in: [optional] [multiple] as-out: [optional] [multiple] interas-in: [optional] [multiple] interas-out: [optional] [multiple] as-exclude: [optional] [multiple] default: [optional] [multiple] tech-c: [mandatory] [multiple] admin-c: [mandatory] [multiple] guardian: [mandatory] [single] remarks: [optional] [multiple] notify: [optional] [multiple] maintainer: [optional] [single] changed: [mandatory] [multiple] source: [mandatory] [single] Each attribute has the following syntax: aut-num: The autonomous system number. This must be a uniquely allo- cated autonomous system number from an AS registry (i.e. the RIPE NCC, the Inter-NIC, etc). Format: AS<positive integer between 1 and 65535> Example: aut-num: AS1104 Status: mandatory, only one line allowed descr: A short description of the Autonomous System. Format: free text Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed as-in: ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 49 - Example: descr: NIKHEF section H descr: Science Park Watergraafsmeer descr: Amsterdam A description of accepted routing information between AS peers. Format: from <aut-num> <cost> accept <routing policy expression> The keywords from and accept are optional and can be omit- ted. <aut-num> refers to your AS neighbour. <cost> is a positive integer used to express a relative cost of routes learned. The lower the cost the more pre- ferred the route. <routing policy expression> can take the following for- mats. 1. A list of one or more ASes, AS Macros, Communities or Network Lists. A Network List is a list of network numbers in prefix length format, separated by commas, and surrounded by curly brackets. Examples: as-in: from AS1103 100 accept AS1103 as-in: from AS786 105 accept AS1103 as-in: from AS786 10 accept AS786 HEPNET as-in: from AS1755 110 accept AS1103 AS786 as-in: from AS3333 100 accept {192.87.45.0/16, 128.141.0.0/16} 2. A set of KEYWORDS. The following KEYWORD is currently defined: ANY this means anything the neighbour AS knows. 3. A logical expression of either 1 or 2 above The current logical operators are defined as: AND OR NOT ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 50 - NOTE: if no logical operator is given between ASes, AS-macros, Communities, Network Lists and KEYWORDS it is implicitly evaluated as an `OR' operation. The OR can be left out for conciseness. Rules are grouped together using parenthesis i.e "(" and ")". Example: as-in: from AS1755 100 accept ANY AND NOT (AS1234 OR AS513) as-in: from AS1755 150 accept AS1234 OR {35.0.0.0/8} A rule can be wrapped over lines providing the associated <aut-num>, <cost> values and from and accept keywords are repeated and occur on con- secutive lines. Example: as-in: from AS1755 100 accept ANY AND NOT (AS1234 AS513) and as-in: from AS1755 100 accept ANY AND NOT ( as-in: from AS1755 100 accept AS1234 AS513) are evaluated to the same result. Please note that the ordering of these continuing lines matters. Status: optional, multiple lines allowed as-out: A description of generated routing information sent to other AS peers. Format: to <aut-num> announce <routing policy expression The to and announce keywords are optional and can be omit- ted. <aut-num> refers to your AS neighbour. <routing policy expression> is explained in the as-in attribute definition above. Example: as-out: to AS1104 announce AS978 as-out: to AS1755 announce ANY as-out: to AS786 announce ANY AND NOT (AS978) Status: optional, multiple lines allowed ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 51 - interas-in: Describes incoming local preferences on an inter AS connection. Format: from <aut-num> [<local-rid>] [<neighbor-rid>] <preference> accept <routing policy expression> The keywords from and accept are optional and can be omit- ted. <aut-num> is an autonomous system as defined in as-in. <local-rid> contains the IP address of the border router in the AS describing the policy. IP address must be in prefix length format. This field is optional. <neighbor-rid> contains the IP address of neighbor AS's border router from which this AS accept routes defined in the <routing policy expression>. IP addresses must be in prefix length format. This field is optional. <local-info> contains the IP address of the local border router, followed by a space, followed by the IP address of the remote border router. IP addresses must be in prefix length format. <preference> is defined as follows: (<pref-type>=<value>) It should be noted the parenthesis ``('' and ``)'' and the ``<pref-type>'' keyword must be present for this prefer- ence to be valid. <pref-type> currently only supports "pref". It could be expanded to other type of preference such as TOS/QOS as routing technology matures. <value> can take one of the following values: <cost> <cost> is a positive integer used to express a rela- tive cost of routes learned. The lower the cost the more preferred the route. This <cost> value is only relevant to other interas-in attributes, not to as-in attributes. MED This indicates the AS will use the MUTLI_EXIT_DISCRIMINATOR (MED) metric, as implemented in BGP4 and IDRP, sent from its neighbor AS. NOTE: Combinations of MED and <cost> should be avoided for the same destinations. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 52 - CAVEAT: The pref-type values may well be enhanced in the future as more inter-ASs routing protocols intro- duce other metrics. <routing policy expression> is an expression as defined in as-in above. Examples: interas-in: from AS1104 192.87.45.254/32 192.87.45.80/32 (pref=10) accept AS786 AS987 interas-in: from AS1104 192.87.45.254/32 192.87.45.79/32 (pref=20) accept AS987 interas-in: from AS1103 192.87.45.254/32 192.87.45.32/32 (pref=MED) accept ANY Status: optional, multiple lines allowed interas-out: Format: to <aut-num> [<local-rid>] [<neighbor-rid>] announce [<metric>] <routing policy expression> The keywords to and announce are optional and can be omit- ted. The definitions of <aut-num>, <local-rid> <neighbor-rid>, and <routing policy expression> are identical to those defined in interas-in. <metric> is defined as follows: (<metric-type>=<value>) It should be noted the parenthesis ``('' and ``)'' and the keywords of ``<metric-type>'' must be present for this metric to be valid. <metric-type> currently only supports "metric-out". It could be expanded to other type of preference such as TOS/QOS as routing technology matures. <value> can take one of the following values: <num-metric> <num-metric> is a pre-configured metric for outbound routes. The lower the cost the more preferred the route. This <num-metric> value is only relevant to other interas-out attributes, not to as-out attri- butes. IGP This indicates that this means that the metric reflects the ASs internal topology cost. The topology is reflected here by using MED which is derived from the AS's IGP metric. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 53 - NOTE: Combinations of IGP and <num-metric> should be avoided for the same destinations. CAVEAT: The metric-out values may well be enhanced in the future as more interas protocols make use of metrics. Examples: interas-out: to AS1104 192.87.45.254/32 192.87.45.80/32 (metric-out=10) announce AS23 AS10 interas-out: to AS1104 192.87.45.80/32 (metric-out=15) announce AS10 interas-out: to AS1103 192.87.45.254/32 (metric-out=IGP) announce ANY Status: optional, multiple lines allowed as-exclude: A list of transit ASes to ignore all routes from. Format: exclude <aut-num> to <exclude-route-keyword> Keywords exclude and to are optional and can again be omitted. <aut-num> refers to the transit AS in question. an <exclude-route-keyword> can be ONE of the following. 1. <aut-num> 2. AS macro 3. Community 4. ANY Examples: as-exclude: exclude AS690 to HEPNET This means exclude any HEPNET routes which have a route via AS690. as-exclude: exclude AS1800 to AS-EUNET This means exclude any AS-EUNET routes which have a route via AS1800. as-exclude: exclude AS1755 to AS1104 This means exclude any AS1104 route which have a route via AS1755. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 54 - as-exclude: exclude AS1104 to ANY This means exclude all routes which have a route via AS1104. Status: optional, multiple lines allowed default: An indication of how default routing is done. Format: <aut-num> <relative cost> <default-expression> where <aut-num> is the AS peer you will default route to, and <relative cost> is the relative cost is a positive integer used to express a preference for default. There is no relationship to the cost used in the as-in tag. The AS peer with the lowest cost is used for default over ones with higher costs. <default-expression> is optional and provides information on how a default route is selected. It can take the fol- lowing formats: 1. static. This indicates that a default is statically configured to this AS peer. 2. A network list with the syntax as described in the as-in attribute. This indicates that this list of routes is used to generate a default route. A special but valid value in this is the special route used by some routing protocols to indicate default: 0.0.0.0/0 3. default. This is the same as {0.0.0.0/0}. This means that the routing protocol between these two peers generates a true default. Examples: default: AS1755 10 default: AS786 5 {140.222.0.0/16, 192.87.45.0/24} default: AS2043 15 default Status: optional, multiple lines allowed tech-c: Full name or uniquely assigned NIC-handle of a technical con- tact person. This is someone to be contacted for technical problems such as misconfiguration. Format: <firstname> <initials> <lastname> or <nic-handle> ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 55 - Example: tech-c: John E Doe tech-c: JED31 Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed admin-c: Full name or uniquely assigned NIC-handle of an administrative contact person. In many cases this would be the name of the guardian. Format: <firstname> <initials> <lastname> or <nic-handle> Example: admin-c: Joe T Bloggs admin-c: JTB1 Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed guardian: Mailbox of the guardian of the Autonomous system. Format: <email-address> The <email-address> should be in RFC822 domain format wherever possible. Example: guardian: as1104-guardian(a)nikhef.nl Status: mandatory, only one line and e-mail address allowed remarks: Remarks/comments, to be used only for clarification. Format: free text Example: remarks: Multihomed AS talking to AS1755 and AS786 remarks: Will soon connect to AS1104 also. Status: optional, multiple lines allowed notify: The notify attribute contains an email address to which notifi- cations of changes to this object should be sent. See also [11]. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 56 - Format: <email-address> The <email-address> should be in RFC822 domain syntax wherever possible. Example: notify: Marten.Terpstra(a)ripe.net Status: optional, multiple lines allowed maintainer: The maintainer attribute contains a registered maintainer name. See also [11]. Format: <registered maintainer name> Example: maintainer: RIPE-DBM Status: optional, multiple lines allowed changed: Who changed this object last, and when was this change made. Format: <email-address> YYMMDD <email-address> should be the address of the person who made the last change. YYMMDD denotes the date this change was made. Example: changed: johndoe(a)terabit-labs.nn 900401 Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed source: Source of the information. This is used to separate information from different sources kept by the same database software. For RIPE database entries the value is fixed to RIPE. Format: RIPE Status: mandatory, only one line allowed ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 57 - Appendix B - Syntax details for the community object. Here is a summary of the tags associated with community object itself and their status. The first column specifies the attribute, the second column whether this attribute is mandatory in the commun- ity object, and the third column whether this specific attribute can occur only once per object [single], or more than once [multiple]. When specifying multiple lines per attribute, the attribute name must be repeated. See [6] the example for the descr: attribute. community: [mandatory] [single] descr: [mandatory] [multiple] authority: [mandatory] [single] guardian: [mandatory] [single] tech-c: [mandatory] [multiple] admin-c: [mandatory] [multiple] remarks: [optional] [multiple] notify: [optional] [multiple] maintainer: [optional] [single] changed: [mandatory] [multiple] source: [mandatory] [single] Each attribute has the following syntax: community: Name of the community. The name of the community should be descriptive of the community it describes. Format: Upper case text string which cannot start with "AS" or any of the <routing policy expression> KEYWORDS. See Appendix A. Example: community: WCW Status: mandatory, only one line allowed descr: A short description of the community represented. Format: free text Example: descr: Science Park Watergraafsmeer descr: Amsterdam Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 58 - authority: The formal authority for this community. This could be an organisation, institute, committee, etc. Format: free text Example: authority: WCW LAN Committee Status: mandatory, only one line allowed guardian: Mailbox of the guardian of the community. Format: <email-address> The <email-address> should be in RFC822 domain format wherever possible. Example: guardian: wcw-guardian(a)nikhef.nl Status: mandatory, only one line and email address allowed tech-c: Full name or uniquely assigned NIC-handle of an technical con- tact person for this community. Format: <firstname> <initials> <lastname> or <nic-handle> Example: tech-c: John E Doe tech-c: JED31 Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed admin-c: Full name or uniquely assigned NIC-handle of an administrative contact person. In many cases this would be the name of the guardian. Format: <firstname> <initials> <lastname> or <nic-handle> Example: admin-c: Joe T Bloggs admin-c: JTB1 ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 59 - Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed remarks: Remarks/comments, to be used only for clarification. Format: free text Example: remarks: Temporary community remarks: Will be removed after split into ASes Status: optional, multiple lines allowed notify: The notify attribute contains an email address to which notifi- cations of changes to this object should be send. See also [11]. Format: <email-address> The <email-address> should be in RFC822 domain syntax wherever possible. Example: notify: Marten.Terpstra(a)ripe.net Status: optional, multiple lines allowed maintainer: The maintainer attribute contains a registered maintainer name. See also [11]. Format: <registered maintainer name> Example: maintainer: RIPE-DBM Status: optional, multiple lines allowed changed: Who changed this object last, and when was this change made. Format: <email-address> YYMMDD <email-address> should be the address of the person who made the last change. YYMMDD denotes the date this change was made. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 60 - Example: changed: johndoe(a)terabit-labs.nn 900401 Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed source: Source of the information. This is used to separate information from different sources kept by the same database software. For RIPE database entries the value is fixed to RIPE. Format: RIPE Status: mandatory, only one line allowed ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 61 - Appendix C - AS Macros syntax definition. Here is a summary of the tags associated with as-macro object itself and their status. The first column specifies the attribute, the second column whether this attribute is mandatory in the as-macro object, and the third column whether this specific attribute can occur only once per object [single], or more than once [multiple]. When specifying multiple lines per attribute, the attribute name must be repeated. See [6] the example for the descr: attribute. as-macro: [mandatory] [single] descr: [mandatory] [multiple] as-list: [mandatory] [multiple] guardian: [mandatory] [single] tech-c: [mandatory] [multiple] admin-c: [mandatory] [multiple] remarks: [optional] [multiple] notify: [optional] [multiple] maintainer: [optional] [single] changed: [mandatory] [multiple] source: [mandatory] [single] Each attribute has the following syntax: as-macro: The name of a macro containing at least two Autonomous Systems grouped together for ease of administration. Format: AS-<string> The <string> should be in upper case and not contain any special characters. Example: as-macro: AS-EBONE Status: mandatory, only one line allowed descr: A short description of the Autonomous System Macro. Format: free text Example: descr: Macro for EBONE connected ASes Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 62 - as-list: The list of ASes that make up this macro. Format: <aut-num> <aut-num> ... See Appendix A for <aut-num> definition. Example: as-list: AS786 AS513 AS1104 Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed guardian: Mailbox of the guardian of this AS macro. Format: <email-address> The <email-address> should be in RFC822 domain format wherever possible. Example: guardian: as-ebone-guardian(a)ebone.net Status: mandatory, only one line and e-mail address allowed tech-c: Full name or uniquely assigned NIC-handle of a technical con- tact person for this macro. This is someone to be contacted for technical problems such as misconfiguration. Format: <firstname> <initials> <lastname> or <nic-handle> Examples: tech-c: John E Doe tech-c: JED31 Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed admin-c: Full name or uniquely assigned NIC-handle of an administrative contact person. In many cases this would be the name of the guardian. Format: <firstname> <initials> <lastname> or <nic-handle> Examples: ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 63 - admin-c: Joe T Bloggs admin-c: JTB1 Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed remarks: Remarks/comments, to be used only for clarification. Format: free text Example: remarks: AS321 will be removed from this Macro shortly Status: optional, multiple lines allowed notify: The notify attribute contains an email address to which notifi- cations of changes to this object should be send. See also [11]. Format: <email-address> The <email-address> should be in RFC822 domain syntax wherever possible. Example: notify: Marten.Terpstra(a)ripe.net Status: optional, multiple lines allowed maintainer: The maintainer attribute contains a registered maintainer name. See also [11]. Format: <registered maintainer name> Example: maintainer: RIPE-DBM Status: optional, multiple lines allowed changed: Who changed this object last, and when was this change made. Format: <email-address> YYMMDD ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 64 - <email-address> should be the address of the person who made the last change. YYMMDD denotes the date this change was made. Example: changed: johndoe(a)terabit-labs.nn 900401 Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed source: Source of the information. This is used to separate information from different sources kept by the same database software. For RIPE database entries the value is fixed to RIPE. Format: RIPE Status: mandatory, only one line allowed ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 65 - Appendix D - Syntax for the "route" object. There is a summary of the tags associated with community object itself and their status. The first column specifies the attribute, the second column whether this attribute is mandatory in the commun- ity object, and the third column whether this specific attribute can occur only once per object [single], or more than once [multiple]. When specifying multiple lines per attribute, the attribute name must be repeated. See [6] the example for the descr: attribute. route: [mandatory] [single] descr: [mandatory] [multiple] origin: [mandatory] [single] hole: [optional] [multiple] withdrawn: [optional] [multiple] comm-list: [optional] [multiple] remarks: [optional] [multiple] notify: [optional] [multiple] maintainer: [optional] [single] changed: [mandatory] [multiple] source: [mandatory] [single] Each attribute has the following syntax: route: Route being announced. Format: Classless representation of a route with the RIPE database known as the "prefix length" representation. See [10] for more details on classless representations. Examples: route: 192.87.45.0/24 This represents addressable bits 192.87.45.0 to 192.87.45.255. route: 192.1.128.0/17 This represents addressable bits 192.1.128.0 to 192.1.255.255. Status: mandatory, only one line allowed origin: The autonomous system announcing this route. Format: <aut-num> ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 66 - See appendix A for <aut-num> syntax. Example: origin: AS1104 Status: mandatory, only one line allowed hole: Denote the parts of the address space covered this route object to which the originator does not provide connectivity. Format: Classless representation of a route with the RIPE database known as the "prefix length" representation. See [10] for more details on classless representations. It should be noted that is sub-aggregate must be a component of that registered in the route object. Example: hole: 193.0.4.0/24 Status: optional, multiple lines allowed withdrawn: Used to denote the day this route has been withdrawn from the Internet routing mesh. This will be usually be used when a less specific aggregate route is now routed the more specific (i.e. this route) is not need anymore. It should be noted that this date cannot be in the future. Format: YYMMDD YYMMDD denotes the date this route was withdrawn. Example: withdrawn: 940711 Status: optional, multiple lines allowed comm-list: List of one or more communities this route is part of. Format: <community> <community> ... See Appendix B for <community> definition. Example: comm-list: HEP LEP ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 67 - Status: optional, multiple lines allowed remarks: Remarks/comments, to be used only for clarification. Format: free text Example: remarks: Multihomed AS talking to AS1755 and AS786 remarks: Will soon connect to AS1104 also. Status: optional, multiple lines allowed notify: The notify attribute contains an email address to which notifi- cations of changes to this object should be send. See also [11]. Format: <email-address> The <email-address> should be in RFC822 domain syntax wherever possible. Example: notify: Marten.Terpstra(a)ripe.net Status: optional, multiple lines allowed maintainer: The maintainer attribute contains a registered maintainer name. See also [11]. Format: <registered maintainer name> Example: maintainer: RIPE-DBM Status: optional, multiple lines allowed changed: Who changed this object last, and when was this change made. Format: <email-address> YYMMDD <email-address> should be the address of the person who made the last change. YYMMDD denotes the date this change was made. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 68 - Example: changed: johndoe(a)terabit-labs.nn 900401 Status: mandatory, multiple lines allowed source: Source of the information. This is used to separate information from different sources kept by the same database software. For RIPE database entries the value is fixed to RIPE. Format: RIPE Status: mandatory, only one line allowed ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 69 - Appendix E - List of reserved words The following list of words are reserved for use within the attri- butes of the AS object. The use of these words is solely for the purpose of clarity. All keywords must be lower case. accept announce exclude from to transit Examples of the usage of the reserved words are: as-in: from neighborAS accept route as-out: to neighborAS announce route as-exclude: exclude ASpath to destination as-transit: transit ASpath to destination default: from neighborAS accept route default: to neighborAS announce route Note: that as-transit is an experimental attribute. See section 10. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 70 - Appendix F - Motivations for RIPE-81++ This appendix gives motivations for the major changes in this propo- sal from ripe-81. (It is not complete yet). The main goals of the routing registry rework are: SPLIT Separate the allocation and routing registry functions into different database objects. This will facilitate data manage- ment if the Internet registry and routing registry functions are separated (like in other parts of the world). It will also make more clear what is part of the routing registry and who has authority to change allocation vs. routing data. CIDR Add the possibility to specify classless routes in the routing registry. Classless routes are being used in Internet produc- tion now. Aggregation information in the routing registry is necessary for network layer troubleshooting. It is also neces- sary because aggregation influences routing policies directly. CALLOC Add the possibility to allocate address space on classless boundaries in the allocation registry. This is a way to preserve address space. CLEAN To clean up some of the obsolete and unused parts of the rout- ing registry. The major changes are now discussed in turn: Introduce Classless Addresses CIDR, CALLOC Introduce route object. SPLIT, CIDR and CALLOC. Delete obsolete attributes from inetnum. CLEAN. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 71 - Delete RIPE-DB and LOCAL from routing policy expressions. CLEAN Allow multiple ASes to originate the same route Because it is being done. CIDR. Made possible by SPLIT. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994 - 72 - Appendix G - Transition strategy from RIPE-81 to RIPE-81++ Transition from the routing registry described by ripe-81 to the routing registry described in this document is a straightforward process once the new registry functions have been implemented in the database software and are understood by the most commonly used registry tools. The routing related attributes in the classful inet- num objects of ripe-81 can be directly translated into new routing objects. Then these attributes can be deleted from the inetnum object making that object if conform to the new schema. Proposed transition steps: 1) Implement classless addresses and new object definition in the database software. 2) Make common tools understand the new schema and prefer it if both old and new are present. 3) Invite everyone to convert their data to the new format. This can be encouraged by doing conversions automatically and pro- posing them to maintainers. 4) At a flag day remove all remaining routing information from the inetnum objects. Before the flag day all usage of obsoleted inetnum attributes has to cease and all other routing registry functions have to be taken over by the new objects and attri- butes. The current estimate is that point three can be reached in the Sum- mer 1994 if the draft is accepted by mid-June. The flag day should be scheduled 3-4 months after this point. ripe-1nn.txt August, 1994

1 0

The Top 20 and some deltas
by Tony Bates 18 Aug '94

18 Aug '94

This is an auto-generated mail on Wed Aug 17 21:00:00 MET DST 1994 This is a list of the "Top 20" players who if CIDRizing at the AS level could make a significant gain in the size of Internet routing tables. This may be an over-estimation but it is hoped that this can act as an incentive for the "Top 20" and others to look at their CIDR capability. A full summary of all the ASes seen in the Internet can be seen by looking in: ftp.ripe.net:cidr/stats/AS* As stated above this is auto-generated so it is not checked before it leaves my workstation. Please also find a summary of the last weeks changes in terms of withdrawn and added routes. Please note that this is only a snapshot but does some indication of ASes participating in CIDR. More information can be found in: ftp.ripe.net:cidr/stats/Delta.* Also, for a short time this gives details of any possibly interesting aggregates currently seen in the routing. Interesting here means not a aggregate made as a chuck of classful routes. This a daily snaphost of changes in classfull routes being withdrawn and added. the deltas are calculated over a rolling 8 day period. Please bear in mind this is purely a "snapshot" and a large flucuation could be caused by a connectivity problem for example. However, this does give some indication of service providers that are moving to classless routing. Top 20 Withdrawn Routes from 10Aug94 to 17Aug94 -83 AS19 CSS-DOMAIN -45 AS3609 CYBER-NET -44 AS1849 PIPEX, Public IP EXchange -40 AS2907 SINET-AS -29 AS1729 TIPnet -25 AS760 University of Vienna, Austria -19 AS137 GARR -18 AS1250 SINGAPORE-AS -9 AS719 LANLINK autonomous system -8 AS679 Technical University Vienna LAN -7 AS1741 FUNET autonomous system -6 AS2136 PCC-TECHNO-AS -5 AS3354 THENET-AS-1 -4 AS3407 INTERPATH-NC -3 AS2605 CESNET backbone B - EMPB -2 AS3578 MV-1 -1 AS175 AFWL-AS Top 20 Added Routes from 10Aug94 to 17Aug94 151 AS1740 CERFNET 83 AS568 SUMNET-AS 82 AS279 SURANET-AS-2 76 AS86 SURANET-AS 69 AS701 AlterNet 38 AS97 JVNC-AS 26 AS174 NYSERNET-AS 23 AS2044 WORLDNET-AS 15 AS372 NSN-AMES-AS 12 AS93 MIDNET-AS 11 AS2915 SPIN-NET 10 AS560 NEARNET-EXT-AS 9 AS1267 I2U Autonomous System 8 AS2699 BBN-DSI1 7 AS1225 CICNET3-AS 6 AS2637 GEORGIA-TECH 5 AS3113 DOC-ESA-ASN 4 AS2548 DIGEX-AS 3 AS1793 SPRINTLINK5 2 AS1103 SURFnet IP List of possibly interesting aggregates --------------------------------------- aggregate origin-AS 17.127.4.0/22 AS1791 193.195.1.4/30 AS786 193.232.88.16/28 AS1803 194.46.1.4/30 AS2873 194.46.17.4/30 AS2873 Here follows the last weeks "Top 20" list with the corresponding date. --- 17Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1161 612 549 47.3% AlterNet AS174 1351 959 392 29.0% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1181 845 336 28.5% NSN-AMES-AS AS19 639 398 241 37.7% CSS-DOMAIN AS1270 466 243 223 47.9% EUnet/DE AS560 583 416 167 28.6% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS279 490 355 135 27.6% SURANET-AS-2 AS1740 487 361 126 25.9% CERFNET AS1250 242 117 125 51.7% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 313 202 111 35.5% DFN-IP AS97 398 289 109 27.4% JVNC-AS AS271 196 104 92 46.9% BCNET-AS AS2150 189 100 89 47.1% CSUNET-SW AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1849 275 201 74 26.9% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1955 143 72 71 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 363 292 71 19.6% SprintLink AS568 244 180 64 26.2% SUMNET-AS AS209 317 256 61 19.2% WESTNET-EAST AS2493 135 75 60 44.4% FONOROLA-EAST --- 16Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1151 612 539 46.8% AlterNet AS174 1351 951 400 29.6% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1166 833 333 28.6% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 465 242 223 48.0% EUnet/DE AS19 719 537 182 25.3% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 580 412 168 29.0% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1740 491 365 126 25.7% CERFNET AS1250 244 121 123 50.4% SINGAPORE-AS AS279 452 330 122 27.0% SURANET-AS-2 AS97 398 287 111 27.9% JVNC-AS AS1275 313 202 111 35.5% DFN-IP AS1849 325 220 105 32.3% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS2150 188 99 89 47.3% CSUNET-SW AS271 178 96 82 46.1% BCNET-AS AS786 299 221 78 26.1% The JANET IP Service AS1955 143 72 71 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 362 291 71 19.6% SprintLink AS2493 133 73 60 45.1% FONOROLA-EAST AS86 341 282 59 17.3% SURANET-AS AS2907 185 126 59 31.9% SINET-AS --- 15Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1149 610 539 46.9% AlterNet AS174 1314 944 370 28.2% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1168 834 334 28.6% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 460 237 223 48.5% EUnet/DE AS19 772 568 204 26.4% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 573 406 167 29.1% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1740 489 365 124 25.4% CERFNET AS279 447 327 120 26.8% SURANET-AS-2 AS1250 237 123 114 48.1% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS1849 323 220 103 31.9% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS97 385 289 96 24.9% JVNC-AS AS271 196 104 92 46.9% BCNET-AS AS2150 180 89 91 50.6% CSUNET-SW AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1955 143 72 71 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 358 287 71 19.8% SprintLink AS209 316 257 59 18.7% WESTNET-EAST AS86 338 280 58 17.2% SURANET-AS AS2907 176 119 57 32.4% SINET-AS --- 14Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1151 612 539 46.8% AlterNet AS174 1321 936 385 29.1% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1137 815 322 28.3% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 460 237 223 48.5% EUnet/DE AS19 755 559 196 26.0% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 577 409 168 29.1% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 421 314 107 25.4% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 324 220 104 32.1% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS97 383 282 101 26.4% JVNC-AS AS271 196 104 92 46.9% BCNET-AS AS2150 180 89 91 50.6% CSUNET-SW AS1250 208 120 88 42.3% SINGAPORE-AS AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1955 143 72 71 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 356 285 71 19.9% SprintLink AS209 317 256 61 19.2% WESTNET-EAST AS2907 187 127 60 32.1% SINET-AS AS86 339 281 58 17.1% SURANET-AS AS2493 129 72 57 44.2% FONOROLA-EAST --- 13Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1149 614 535 46.6% AlterNet AS174 1343 949 394 29.3% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1152 826 326 28.3% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 238 223 48.4% EUnet/DE AS19 754 563 191 25.3% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 579 413 166 28.7% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 424 317 107 25.2% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 323 220 103 31.9% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS97 354 260 94 26.6% JVNC-AS AS271 196 104 92 46.9% BCNET-AS AS2150 181 90 91 50.3% CSUNET-SW AS1250 206 116 90 43.7% SINGAPORE-AS AS786 299 221 78 26.1% The JANET IP Service AS1955 142 71 71 50.0% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 359 288 71 19.8% SprintLink AS2907 185 124 61 33.0% SINET-AS AS86 340 281 59 17.4% SURANET-AS AS209 312 253 59 18.9% WESTNET-EAST AS137 167 110 57 34.1% GARR --- 12Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1141 609 532 46.6% AlterNet AS174 1329 946 383 28.8% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1193 855 338 28.3% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 238 223 48.4% EUnet/DE AS19 704 530 174 24.7% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 580 412 168 29.0% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 269 138 131 48.7% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 411 305 106 25.8% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 325 221 104 32.0% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS271 206 109 97 47.1% BCNET-AS AS97 360 266 94 26.1% JVNC-AS AS2150 189 99 90 47.6% CSUNET-SW AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1955 143 72 71 49.7% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 357 286 71 19.9% SprintLink AS209 332 270 62 18.7% WESTNET-EAST AS2907 185 125 60 32.4% SINET-AS AS549 206 150 56 27.2% ONET-AS AS2493 129 73 56 43.4% FONOROLA-EAST --- 11Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1135 606 529 46.6% AlterNet AS174 1341 954 387 28.9% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1149 821 328 28.5% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 238 223 48.4% EUnet/DE AS19 726 542 184 25.3% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 575 408 167 29.0% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 269 135 134 49.8% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 414 307 107 25.8% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 324 220 104 32.1% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS97 363 264 99 27.3% JVNC-AS AS271 196 104 92 46.9% BCNET-AS AS2150 183 97 86 47.0% CSUNET-SW AS786 301 220 81 26.9% The JANET IP Service AS1239 359 288 71 19.8% SprintLink AS1955 142 72 70 49.3% Computer and Automation Institute AS2907 190 130 60 31.6% SINET-AS AS549 207 151 56 27.1% ONET-AS AS1329 105 49 56 53.3% NSFNETTEST34-AS AS137 165 110 55 33.3% GARR --- 10Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1092 604 488 44.7% AlterNet AS174 1325 933 392 29.6% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1166 834 332 28.5% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 238 223 48.4% EUnet/DE AS19 722 537 185 25.6% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 573 409 164 28.6% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 260 131 129 49.6% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS1849 319 215 104 32.6% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS279 408 305 103 25.2% SURANET-AS-2 AS97 360 262 98 27.2% JVNC-AS AS271 196 104 92 46.9% BCNET-AS AS2150 189 99 90 47.6% CSUNET-SW AS786 297 216 81 27.3% The JANET IP Service AS1955 142 71 71 50.0% Computer and Automation Institute AS1239 361 290 71 19.7% SprintLink AS209 320 259 61 19.1% WESTNET-EAST AS2907 180 121 59 32.8% SINET-AS AS549 207 151 56 27.1% ONET-AS AS1329 104 48 56 53.8% NSFNETTEST34-AS

2 2

The Top 10
by Tony Bates 12 Aug '94

12 Aug '94

This is an auto-generated mail on Fri Aug 12 18:10:00 MET DST 1994 This is a list of the "Top 10" players who if CIDRizing at the AS level could make a significant gain in the size of Internet routing tables. This may be an over-estimation but it is hoped that this can act as an incentive for the "Top 10" and others to look at their CIDR capability. A full summary of all the ASes seen in the Internet can be seen by looking in: ftp.ripe.net:cidr/stats/AS* As stated above this is auto-generated so it is not checked before it leaves my workstation. Please also find a summary of the last weeks changes in terms of withdrawn and added routes. Please note that this is only a snapshot but does some indication of ASes participating in CIDR. More information can be found in: ftp.ripe.net:cidr/stats/Delta.* Top 10 Withdrawn Routes from 05Aug94 to 12Aug94 -42 AS2900 WN-AZ -29 AS1729 TIPnet -20 AS1239 SprintLink -16 AS1754 DESY-HAMBURG -8 AS555 MSCNET-AS -7 AS2865 NATVERK-C, UDAC -5 AS19 CSS-DOMAIN -4 AS86 SURANET-AS -3 AS611 CANET11-AS -2 AS3578 MV-1 Top 10 Added Routes from 05Aug94 to 12Aug94 52 AS701 AlterNet 35 AS210 WESTNET-WEST 23 AS2493 FONOROLA-EAST 21 AS174 NYSERNET-AS 14 AS568 SUMNET-AS 13 AS1793 SPRINTLINK5 12 AS93 MIDNET-AS 11 AS1225 CICNET3-AS 10 AS35 MICATON 9 AS1759 The DataNet IP Service Here follows the last weeks "Top 10" list with the corresponding date. --- 12Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1141 609 532 46.6% AlterNet AS174 1329 946 383 28.8% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1193 855 338 28.3% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 238 223 48.4% EUnet/DE AS19 704 530 174 24.7% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 580 412 168 29.0% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 269 138 131 48.7% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 411 305 106 25.8% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 325 221 104 32.0% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange --- 11Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1135 606 529 46.6% AlterNet AS174 1341 954 387 28.9% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1149 821 328 28.5% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 238 223 48.4% EUnet/DE AS19 726 542 184 25.3% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 575 408 167 29.0% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 269 135 134 49.8% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 414 307 107 25.8% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 324 220 104 32.1% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange --- 10Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1092 604 488 44.7% AlterNet AS174 1325 933 392 29.6% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1166 834 332 28.5% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 238 223 48.4% EUnet/DE AS19 722 537 185 25.6% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 573 409 164 28.6% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 260 131 129 49.6% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS1849 319 215 104 32.6% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS279 408 305 103 25.2% SURANET-AS-2 --- 09Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1132 609 523 46.2% AlterNet AS174 1343 933 410 30.5% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1179 841 338 28.7% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 238 223 48.4% EUnet/DE AS19 721 537 184 25.5% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 574 408 166 28.9% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 269 143 126 46.8% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 409 301 108 26.4% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 316 212 104 32.9% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange --- 08Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1096 605 491 44.8% AlterNet AS174 1305 932 373 28.6% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1183 841 342 28.9% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 238 223 48.4% EUnet/DE AS19 716 535 181 25.3% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 575 409 166 28.9% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 412 303 109 26.5% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 319 215 104 32.6% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS97 356 259 97 27.2% JVNC-AS --- 07Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1096 605 491 44.8% AlterNet AS174 1290 922 368 28.5% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1313 949 364 27.7% NSN-AMES-AS AS568 801 544 257 32.1% SUMNET-AS AS1270 437 228 209 47.8% EUnet/DE AS560 570 405 165 28.9% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS200 469 342 127 27.1% BARRNET-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 412 303 109 26.5% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 316 214 102 32.3% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange --- 06Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1098 605 493 44.9% AlterNet AS174 1310 929 381 29.1% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1142 823 319 27.9% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 461 238 223 48.4% EUnet/DE AS19 723 540 183 25.3% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 576 410 166 28.8% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS1250 247 137 110 44.5% SINGAPORE-AS AS279 410 302 108 26.3% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 312 212 100 32.1% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange --- 05Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1089 608 481 44.2% AlterNet AS174 1308 928 380 29.1% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1183 848 335 28.3% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 460 237 223 48.5% EUnet/DE AS19 709 538 171 24.1% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 577 410 167 28.9% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 269 138 131 48.7% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 407 300 107 26.3% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 319 215 104 32.6% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange

1 0

The Top 10
by Tony Bates 05 Aug '94

05 Aug '94

This is an auto-generated mail on Fri Aug 5 18:10:00 MET DST 1994 This is a list of the "Top 10" players who if CIDRizing at the AS level could make a significant gain in the size of Internet routing tables. This may be an over-estimation but it is hoped that this can act as an incentive for the "Top 10" and others to look at their CIDR capability. A full summary of all the ASes seen in the Internet can be seen by looking in: ftp.ripe.net:cidr/stats/AS* As stated above this is auto-generated so it is not checked before it leaves my workstation. Please also find a summary of the last weeks changes in terms of withdrawn and added routes. Please note that this is only a snapshot but does some indication of ASes participating in CIDR. More information can be found in: ftp.ripe.net:cidr/stats/Delta.* Top 10 Withdrawn Routes from 29Jul94 to 05Aug94 -127 AS1206 PSCNET-HS-AS -44 AS3609 CYBER-NET -42 AS1849 PIPEX, Public IP EXchange -37 AS1853 ACOnet Backbone -29 AS200 BARRNET-AS -24 AS760 University of Vienna, Austria -23 AS2917 oleANe, Groupe APYSOFT -17 AS1955 Computer and Automation Institute -16 AS210 WESTNET-WEST -15 AS1270 EUnet/DE Top 10 Added Routes from 29Jul94 to 05Aug94 115 AS3576 PREPNET-EAST 70 AS1329 NSFNETTEST34-AS 29 AS2907 SINET-AS 19 AS19 CSS-DOMAIN 15 AS97 JVNC-AS 14 AS701 AlterNet 12 AS204 PSCNET-AS 10 AS1239 SprintLink 9 AS271 BCNET-AS 7 AS1204 SUNYNET-ASN-AS Here follows the last weeks "Top 10" list with the corresponding date. --- 05Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1089 608 481 44.2% AlterNet AS174 1308 928 380 29.1% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1183 848 335 28.3% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 460 237 223 48.5% EUnet/DE AS19 709 538 171 24.1% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 577 410 167 28.9% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 269 138 131 48.7% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 407 300 107 26.3% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 319 215 104 32.6% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange --- 04Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1085 603 482 44.4% AlterNet AS174 1304 927 377 28.9% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1185 845 340 28.7% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 478 240 238 49.8% EUnet/DE AS19 707 537 170 24.0% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 575 408 167 29.0% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 269 142 127 47.2% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 413 303 110 26.6% SURANET-AS-2 AS1849 317 213 104 32.8% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange --- 03Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1079 599 480 44.5% AlterNet AS174 1321 928 393 29.8% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1190 851 339 28.5% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 474 238 236 49.8% EUnet/DE AS560 574 411 163 28.4% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS19 682 519 163 23.9% CSS-DOMAIN AS1250 269 132 137 50.9% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 412 303 109 26.5% SURANET-AS-2 AS97 360 262 98 27.2% JVNC-AS --- 02Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1076 599 477 44.3% AlterNet AS174 1321 929 392 29.7% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1180 848 332 28.1% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 474 238 236 49.8% EUnet/DE AS19 705 536 169 24.0% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 576 409 167 29.0% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1250 272 127 145 53.3% SINGAPORE-AS AS1849 338 218 120 35.5% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS279 399 296 103 25.8% SURANET-AS-2 AS1275 296 194 102 34.5% DFN-IP --- 01Aug94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1063 597 466 43.8% AlterNet AS174 1254 906 348 27.8% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1164 841 323 27.7% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 474 238 236 49.8% EUnet/DE AS19 689 524 165 23.9% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 571 408 163 28.5% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1849 362 227 135 37.3% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1250 266 133 133 50.0% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 404 300 104 25.7% SURANET-AS-2 --- 31Jul94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1072 596 476 44.4% AlterNet AS174 1268 913 355 28.0% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1283 942 341 26.6% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 475 239 236 49.7% EUnet/DE AS568 742 516 226 30.5% SUMNET-AS AS560 570 408 162 28.4% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS200 500 363 137 27.4% BARRNET-AS AS1849 361 226 135 37.4% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1250 244 130 114 46.7% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP --- 30Jul94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1072 596 476 44.4% AlterNet AS174 1298 915 383 29.5% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1152 832 320 27.8% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 475 239 236 49.7% EUnet/DE AS19 702 533 169 24.1% CSS-DOMAIN AS560 569 408 161 28.3% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS1849 361 226 135 37.4% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1250 248 126 122 49.2% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 407 299 108 26.5% SURANET-AS-2 --- 29Jul94 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS701 1075 599 476 44.3% AlterNet AS174 1301 919 382 29.4% NYSERNET-AS AS372 1190 861 329 27.6% NSN-AMES-AS AS1270 475 239 236 49.7% EUnet/DE AS560 574 411 163 28.4% NEARNET-EXT-AS AS19 690 527 163 23.6% CSS-DOMAIN AS1849 361 226 135 37.4% PIPEX, Public IP EXchange AS1250 257 131 126 49.0% SINGAPORE-AS AS1275 312 201 111 35.6% DFN-IP AS279 408 301 107 26.2% SURANET-AS-2

1 0