Re: Should ris IGNORE default routes?

I would like to create "simple" tool for IP->AS mapping based on riswhois data.

i do not believe whois data have anything about as numbers

Would you suggest some "safe to ignore" margin for number of rispeers?

so, you're looking at routing data (!=whois). the problem is that some of the ris peers o send all routes they know: internal, customer, peers, upstreams o send all internal and customer o send all customer o ... so you're in for a complex and fun game on the path you're suggesting randy