FW: NCC#2004073298 Re: rrc01:PEERING 8210
Peering requests hasn't worked very well in the past. Good work :) Cheers, Matthew
-----Original Message----- From: RIPE NCC Acknowledgements [mailto:hm-ack@ripe.net] Sent: 23 July 2004 14:48 To: RIS Peering Request Subject: NCC#2004073298 Re: rrc01:PEERING 8210
Greetings,
This message has been automatically generated in response to the e-mail:
To: RIS Peerings<rispeering@ripe.net> From: RIS Peering Request <risops@ripe.net> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:47:44 GMT Message-ID: <200407231247.i6NCli3U013164@halfweg.ripe.net> Subject: rrc01:PEERING 8210
There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been assigned an ID of "NCC#2004073298". Please include this string in the subject line of any further correspondence on this matter.
For more information about the RIPE NCC RIS Project, please refer to http://www.ripe.net/ris/.
Thank you,
RIPE NCC Software Department
--On Friday, 23 July, 2004 16:11 +0200 Matthew Williams <matthew@ripe.net> wrote:
Peering requests hasn't worked very well in the past. Good work :)
Cheers, Matthew
-----Original Message----- From: RIPE NCC Acknowledgements [mailto:hm-ack@ripe.net]
The mail should probably come from an address other than than hm-ack@ripe.net James
-----Original Message----- From: RIPE NCC Acknowledgements [mailto:hm-ack@ripe.net]
The mail should probably come from an address other than than hm-ack@ripe.net
As far as I know hm-ack@ripe.net goes to /dev/null and I did not see much point create another alias to /dev/null and used the available one. Arife
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Arife Vural wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: RIPE NCC Acknowledgements [mailto:hm-ack@ripe.net]
The mail should probably come from an address other than than hm-ack@ripe.net
As far as I know hm-ack@ripe.net goes to /dev/null and I did not see much point create another alias to /dev/null and used the available one.
In that case, shouldn't the message come from "do not reply" and have a Reply-to: field? Henk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Process and Procedure are the last hiding place of people without the wit and wisdom to do their job properly. (David Brent).
From: RIPE NCC Acknowledgements [mailto:hm-ack@ripe.net]
The mail should probably come from an address other than than hm-ack@ripe.net
As far as I know hm-ack@ripe.net goes to /dev/null and I did not see much point create another alias to /dev/null and used the available one.
In that case, shouldn't the message come from "do not reply" and have a
something like that I guess, do-not-reply@ripe.net. it sounds good to me.
Reply-to: field?
Now, it looks we do not have Reply-to, I'm not sure it will make sense setting this one, since we do not want them reply for ACK. I will check with other guys and it would be useful or not. arife
Henk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Process and Procedure are the last hiding place of people without the wit and wisdom to do their job properly. (David Brent).
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Arife Vural wrote:
From: RIPE NCC Acknowledgements [mailto:hm-ack@ripe.net]
The mail should probably come from an address other than than hm-ack@ripe.net
As far as I know hm-ack@ripe.net goes to /dev/null and I did not see much point create another alias to /dev/null and used the available one.
In that case, shouldn't the message come from "do not reply" and have a
something like that I guess, do-not-reply@ripe.net. it sounds good to me.
Reply-to: field?
Now, it looks we do not have Reply-to, I'm not sure it will make sense setting this one, since we do not want them reply for ACK. I will check with other guys and it would be useful or not.
No, but people tend to reply to the last mail they have in their files, if you use something like hm-ack@r.n it looks as if a human will read it. Henk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Process and Procedure are the last hiding place of people without the wit and wisdom to do their job properly. (David Brent).
Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC) wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Arife Vural wrote:
>From: RIPE NCC Acknowledgements [mailto:hm-ack@ripe.net]
The mail should probably come from an address other than than hm-ack@ripe.net
As far as I know hm-ack@ripe.net goes to /dev/null and I did not see much point create another alias to /dev/null and used the available one.
In that case, shouldn't the message come from "do not reply" and have a
something like that I guess, do-not-reply@ripe.net. it sounds good to me.
Reply-to: field?
Now, it looks we do not have Reply-to, I'm not sure it will make sense setting this one, since we do not want them reply for ACK. I will check with other guys and it would be useful or not.
No, but people tend to reply to the last mail they have in their files, if you use something like hm-ack@r.n it looks as if a human will read it.
We have an address for this, called <unread@ripe.net>. Arife, can you change the autoresponder accordingly? TIA, -- Shane Kerr RIPE NCC
participants (5)
-
Arife Vural -
Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC) -
James Aldridge -
Matthew Williams -
Shane Kerr