At 15:48 05/01/2006, Arife Vural wrote:
Can you have a look at (2) below? (bgpinspect missing data). Start by checking if there is data in the DB. If there is, then he has a problem ;-)
Actually, it looks those sessions are down on RRC00 or some of them changed their IP address and we have not been informed.
Dit you contact them? Henk
Arife
Henk
X-Original-To: henk@ripe.net Delivered-To: henk@ripe.net Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:59:59 -0500 (EST) From: Manish Karir <mkarir@merit.edu> To: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net> Subject: Re: Announce: BGP-Inspect sites for non-routeviews data... X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu X-RIPE-Spam-Level: X-RIPE-Spam-Tests: BAYES_00 X-RIPE-Spam-Status: U 0.241425 / -2.6 X-RIPE-Signature: bcbd6cf79ed8d289563833a3c0eaefd5
Hi Henk,
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
1) Something must be wrong, as all queries that I've tried return
Query Error
Error: db query failed (error: no stat file )
This was a due to a couple of related problems. The reason for this error is that the global summary statistics have not yet been computed. The reason this had not been done at the time of your query...was because an update to the original bgpinspect-routeviews took too much time. (the various databases are on the same machine and there updates are serialized.) It should work now, as the databases have been updated with Jan 3 data, and the summary stat have been computed and saved.
What were were really hoping was that RIPE might be able to host the bgpinspect-ripe site. This would take the load off of our server, and updates would be faster and we would not have to fetch the data all the way here in order to update the database. Please let me know if you are interested in trying this out. We have been on the code on and off for a while and by now we have it to the point where it is much easier to install/use. All you would need to do is provide a linux box with a large fast disk. We can help with the install of the software. I mentioned this to Arife sometime ago and she seemed to be in favor of the idea.
2) It also looks as if you are only including the data from the RRC00 route collector, not from any of the others.
Right now we only do RRC00 collectors due to the load and disk space limitations...
On a related note we notice that we are not getting any data from 6 of the RRC00 collectors? - SURFnet - 195.69.144.34 - EUnet - 213.84.9.180 - Tiscali- 195.69.144.85 - SOLA AG - 212.47.190.1 - RIS - 193.0.1.239 - CCD - 212.20.151.234
Are there known problems with these peering sessions or maybe we are doing something wrong at our end?
thanks manish
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1160438400. Watch this space...
-- Arife Vural SED, RIPE NCC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1160438400. Watch this space...