Sorry, I don't see your point. This case is exactly the same as with rrc09: Based on the principle that an integer relates to a particular collection point irrespective of hardware, then keeping the same number doesn't make sense, and might even cause confusion among RIS users. At first _I_ didn't agree, but Rene and Lorenzo managed to convince me that they were right ;) Cheers, Matthew
-----Original Message----- From: ris-int-admin@ripe.net [mailto:ris-int-admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Arife Vural Sent: 16 August 2004 17:37 To: Matthew Williams Cc: ops@ripe.net; ris-int@ripe.net; 'James Aldridge'; 'Bruce Campbell' Subject: Re: [ripe.net #102454] [henk@ripe.net: Re: [ris-int] Re: RIPE NCC RIS box @ PAIX]
I think we had this discussion before re: rrc09, and then we came to a different conclusion. At least, we should be consequent in order to cause minimal confusion. What changed?
rrc09 was bit different than rrc08. rrc09 did not have DB, rrc08 has and I like to continue to use the same DB when it moves to PAIX. And purpose of rrc08 was getting the view from West Coast and we will be available still at the West Coast. I do not think it's useful to split rawdata just because we will change IX at the same area.
Arife