Re: [ris-int] riswhois request: reporting parent routes (fwd)

On 06.09 15:30, Rene Wilhelm wrote:

Hi,

Though it's nice to have an active user providing suggestions, I have the feeling his latest request would fall in the category "feature creep", making the program larger, more complex and the output harder to understand.

However, before sending him a polite no-no, I'd like to ask how others in RIS feel about this. Should RISwhois embark on the trail of cross examining other routes (parents, daughters, siblings, ...) or not?

I do not understand the question fully but I would point him to the RIS itself. If this is a general question we could do a specialised query to the RIS for it. But not complicate riswhois. Small is beautiful. Daniel