Hi, On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:59:48AM +0000, Andy Davidson wrote:
This is not consensus building. This is not suitable methodology from the Chair. This is disingenuous.
The NomCom has been put in a very difficult situation here. We have a document that tells us what to do. We do that. In the middle of the road, concerns are voiced that the document is not good enough - which might be a valid statement or not, but how should it affect the current process, given the simultaneously expressed support for all the persons involved?
I would ask those wishing to contribute to this thread to read the ripe-chair-discuss thread to familiarise themselves with the complaint.
The pool of talent in the RIPE community is sufficiently large enough to mean that the independence of the NCC and Community can be preserved through having different people contribute to the work of our committees, working-groups, and leadership teams; to say or to behave that this is not the case demonstrates contempt.
We do have a good set of very talented and widely recognized nominees. Would it be good to have a wider selection? Maybe. Have all these other people of talent come forward and volunteered? No. What shall we do? Gert Doering -- member of the NomCom. -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279