There may be also different approaches altogether. We may be missing e.g. some visually impaired or dyslectic people, who often rely more on sound
Hi, Maria Matejka wrote: than on text ? yet keeping in mind that sound may be on the other hand a showstopper for not only hearing-impaired but also e.g. for lots of ADHD people. I'm not proposing anything specific here, just trying to shed some light on other factors we haven't yet covered. I have a different "disability": I read legalese, and I believe that it is intent to actually take away rights I usually have if I am asked to explicitly sign them away. Thus, I used to have a Discord account, but I deleted it after a Terms change not too long ago. Now, if I don't participate because I don't like the terms Discord demands, that is probably not that great a loss for the RIPE community. OTOH, if by the last terms of Discord I saw you discuss/create a new policy document on Discord, you afterwards cannot publish it anywhere else because Discord owns copyright for the thing. Is that useful? Also, I can simply choose to not take part in RIPE processes, but for other people, it's their job. Asking them to accept the terms of a single third party (i.e. with no ability to choose a different set of terms with a different supplier) to be able to do it does not seem like progress to me. (That is a suggestion to use as communication add-on or replacement something where RIPE can set the terms). Regards, Petra Zeidler PS: Usenet has been reinvented, badly, so many times.