Hi, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
At Thu, 8 May 2014 16:20:54 +0100, Jim Reid wrote:
On 8 May 2014, at 15:46, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org> wrote:
As "proposals" aren't people I am not sure whether the decision to
change
the timeline sits with the proposer, the WG chair, or someone else.
Leo, like pretty much everything else in RIPE, this should be a consensus decision by the relevant WG(s). The WG chair should be responsible for making that happen.
I would have hoped it was not necessary to document this. IMO, RIPE needs to keep process and "rules" to the absolute minimum.
As I read it, Leo's point is that, since the unfortunate phrase, "Individual proposals may choose ..." has to be corrected, we may as well choose the appropriate correction.
I had expected to read something about the decision sitting with the WG or the WG chair. I wondered whether "proposals" was a typo for "proposer", hence the question. Regards, Leo