On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, 05.00 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list, <ripe-list@ripe.net> wrote:

    It could also be the other way round. People might be discouraged to run
    against the long-time chairs.


**** Exactly, that's was my point, it looks that I was not able to find the best wording. I've seen that in other organizations, not just here.

1) You ask for volunteers to replace "existing co-chair a"
2) There are 1-2 volunteers
3) "existing co-chair a" say, I will also volunteer to continue
4) There are comments like "existing co-chair a" has been there for long time, he knows the job ...
5) the 1-2 volunteers then drop-out.

Some believe elections for chair means to reelect if the former chair did OK.

I believe Jordi's observation above is correct. It makes the community seem smaller, rather than invite in new people.

I don't believe it would be very likely that no one would step up if the seat really was vacant.

-- 
robert