Mirjam,
On 11/02/2021 13.54, Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
>
> I think we all agree that the overall goal is to have a good and diverse
> set of WG chairs and we want to work with all WGs to facilitate that.
>
> Following the recommendations from the Accountability Task Force, we've
> started looking at the chair selection criteria of all RIPE Working
> Groups. Currently most WGs have terms or regular calls for nominations
> defined as part of their selection criteria. We will continue this review.
Thanks for this. It's a bit wonky but I appreciate the review effort here.
In the light of the discussion about chair selection and term limits, I
thought that I would mention that the RIPE DNS working group already has
these limits.
We have 3 chairs, and each chair serves 3 years. Every year one of the
positions is made available.
With this system there is a chance every year for anyone interested in
serving as a chair to put themselves forward.
An existing chair may volunteer again at the end of their term, one
time, so serving a total of 6 years.
We started using this process 6 years ago, so this year we will have at
least one new chair.
Dave sent a good e-mail last year which documents a bit of the history,
plus each individual chair's period:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/2020-October/003768.html
Cheers,
--
Shane