Hi Toma:Community scrutiny does not in anyway means I speak for anyone else but by myself.Or you are implying community scrutiny only valid when every single person in the community agree?Get some common sense please, any community member have rights raise issue and that called “community scrutiny”. Lu HengChief Executive Officer LARUS LimitedEmail H.Lu@LARUS.net Office +852 2988 8918 Address A3, 11/F, TML Tower, Tsuen Wan, N.T, Hong Kong SARWebsite: LARUS.netThis email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.---- On Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:11:23 +0800 Töma Gavrichenkov<ximaera@gmail.com> wrote ----Peace,On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, 5:47 pm Elad Cohen, <elad@netstyle.io> wrote: Töma, Please don't speak on behalf of the whole RIPE community, thank you.Not at all, because I already don't!If you paid more attention to the text, you might have had a chance to notice the "to me" part after the "the topic seems closed" part.The irony being, in the meantime, Lu Heng is pretending to be speaking on behalf of the whole RIPE community, holding no official community position whatsoever:"That called community scrutiny![..]so Hans, can you please tell the community why you believe [..]"— and, Elad, you again don't seem to pay attention to it.--Töma