- ripe-list - mailman.ripe.net

IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) Call for Public Comment on IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal
by Serge Radovcic 31 Aug '15

31 Aug '15

This message is sent on behalf of the Number Resource Organization (NRO). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IANA STEWARDSHIP TRANSITION COORDINATION GROUP (ICG) CALL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON IANA STEWARDSHIP TRANSITION PROPOSAL For the past 12 months, many in the Internet community have worked hard to formulate a plan for the transition of stewardship of the IANA functions away from the U.S. Government and into the hands of the broader Internet community. Working with and on behalf of the Internet Number Community, the CRISP Team built a plan for the IANA numbering functions, and this now forms part of the transition plan developed by the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group for all of the IANA functions. We are now very close to the end of this long and complex process, and the Number Community has devoted many hours to meetings and discussions around the plan. At this stage of the process, to ensure the success of the transition, it is vital that the global Internet community expresses its support for the ICG proposal. Therefore, we encourage members of the RIR communities to review the ICG’s draft IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal and register their support or any concerns they may have: https://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/IANA-stewardship-transition-prop… Comments can be submitted via an online form or by emailing <public-comments(a)ianacg.org> until 8 September 2015 at 23:59 (UTC). Please note that all questions on the online form about the proposal are optional. The form can be accessed at: https://comments.ianacg.org/form If you agree with the key priorities in the Number Community’s contribution to the proposal – which are focused on ensuring stability, security, reliability, quality of service and community empowerment – please submit your statement of support today! Your comment could be as simple as this: I, as a member of the Number Community, am in favour of the ICG proposal on the IANA stewardship transition. If for any reason you do not agree with the draft proposal, it is essential that you take the time to comment and describe your viewpoint and underlying reasoning. For more information, please review the CRISP Team’s own analysis, which shows how the ICG proposal reflects and supports the CRISP proposal, and the wishes of the global Number Community. It is available here: https://www.nro.net/crisp-response-icg-proposal

1 0

[news] RIPE Policy Proposals - August Update
by Marco Schmidt 28 Aug '15

28 Aug '15

Dear colleagues, Please find below our monthly overview of open policy proposals and the stage they have reached in the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP). If you wish to join the discussion about a particular proposal, please do so on the relevant working group mailing list. Proposals Open for Discussion: NEW: 2015-04, “RIPE Resource Transfer Policies” – Discussion Phase until 14 September 2015 Proposals Accepted: 2015-02, “Keep IPv6 PI When Requesting IPv6 Allocation” Proposals Awaiting Input: 2015-03, “Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size” 2014-03, “Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments” Proposal Overviews: NEW PROPOSAL: 2015-04, “RIPE Resource Transfer Policies” OVERVIEW: This proposal aims to create a single transfer policy with all relevant information on the transfer of Internet number resources, replacing text in several RIPE Policies. The proposal also introduces a 24-month holding period for IPv4 addresses and 16-bit ASNs after any change of holdership. STATUS: Discussion Phase WHERE TO COMMENT: Address Policy Working Group: address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net DEADLINE: 14 September 2015 FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-04 ===== The following proposal has been accepted since the last update. PROPOSAL: 2015-02, “Keep IPv6 PI When Requesting IPv6 Allocation” OVERVIEW: This proposal removes the requirement that LIRs must return their IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) assignment when requesting an IPv6 allocation. STATUS: Accepted IMPLEMENTATION: Implemented on 10 August 2015 FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-02 ===== The following proposals are awaiting input before they go any further in the PDP. PROPOSAL: 2015-03, “Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size” OVERVIEW: This proposal introduces new criteria for the evaluation of large IPv6 allocation requests. These new criteria are hierarchical and geographical structure and segmentation for security and planned longevity. The current requirements, number of users and extent of infrastructure, are retained. RIPE NCC IMPACT ANALYSIS: Includes the RIPE NCC’s understanding of what are reasonable limits for each of the criteria. STATUS: Review Phase - awaiting decision from Working Group Chair WHERE TO COMMENT: Address Policy Working Group: address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-03 PROPOSAL: 2014-03, “Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments” OVERVIEW: This proposal aims to ease the requirements when requesting an Autonomous System (AS) Number. To this end, the following actions are proposed: - Remove the need for evaluation - Limit the number of AS Numbers per organisation to 1,000 - Require that 16-bit AS Numbers are multihomed after nine months RIPE NCC IMPACT ANALYSIS: Includes the point that it will be the End User that decides if the need for an AS Number is technically reasonable. STATUS: Review Phase - awaiting new proposal version WHERE TO COMMENT: Address Policy Working Group: address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2014-03 ===== The RIPE NCC provides an overview of current RIPE Policy Proposals on www.ripe.net: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/current-proposals/current-policy-… We look forward to your involvement in the PDP. Kind regards, Marco Schmidt RIPE Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

NRO NC Call for Nominations
by Axel Pawlik 17 Aug '15

17 Aug '15

Dear colleagues, This is a call for nominations from the RIPE NCC service region to fill one vacant seat on the Number Resource Organization (NRO) Number Council (NC). The three-year term of Dmitry Kohmanyuk ends on 31 December 2015. The election to the NRO NC seat will take place during the Plenary at the RIPE 71 Meeting to be held in Bucharest from 16-20 November 2015. All members of the Internet community who are present at that Plenary may vote in the election. The deadline for nominations is 16 October 2015. Any individual residing within the RIPE NCC service region is eligible for nomination, except Regional Internet Registry (RIR) staff members. Self-nominations are permitted. Please send your nominations to <nominations(a)ripe.net> by 23:59 UTC on 16 October 2015. All confirmed nominations will be listed on the RIPE NCC website by 19 October 2015. All nominees may submit a written statement in support of their nomination for publication on the RIPE NCC website. Other individuals may express support for nominated individuals by sending an email to <nominations(a)ripe.net>. Expressions of support will also be published on the RIPE NCC website. To find out more about the NRO NC and the election process, please see: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/internet-technical-com… Regards, Axel Pawlik Managing Director RIPE NCC

1 0

Re: Promote the use of IRC
by Randy Bush 13 Aug '15

13 Aug '15

in irc culture style, you have shotgunned this everywhere. i already have too much work and too many mailing lists to follow. i have ignored irc for some decades and will continue to do so. randy

1 0

PAM 2016 - Call for Papers
by Antonis Papadogiannakis 12 Aug '15

12 Aug '15

Passive and Active Measurement Conference 2016 (PAM 2016) 31 March - 1 April 2016 Heraklion, Crete, Greece http://www.ics.forth.gr/pam2016/ <http://www.ics.forth.gr/pam2016/> Call for Papers PAM seeks to bring together both the network research and operations communities to consider network measurement and analysis techniques, particularly those in the earlier stages of research. PAM has in the past focused on research and practical applications of network measurement at Layer-3. However, over the last years PAM broadened its scope to encompass measurements of networked applications, content distribution networks, online social networks, overlay networks, and more. Measurement technology is needed at all layers of the stack: for power profiling of hardware components; at the MAC/network/transport layers; as well as up the stack for application profiling and even to collect user feedback. Measurement technologies are being designed for the digital home, residential access networks, wireless and mobile access, enterprise, ISP and data center networks. Although PAM traditionally attracts work that is at an early stage, works that are a reappraisal or independent validation of previous results, or which enhance the reproducibility of network measurement research, for instance by publishing new datasets on an existing topic, are explicitly included in PAM's ambit. Original papers are invited, but not limited to, the following topics: Tools and infrastructure: Passive and active measurement tools: techniques, design and experience Management and operation of measurement infrastructures Management and visualization of measurement data Measurements across the stack: Application-layer, e.g., social networks, crowdsourcing or gaming End user performance and quality of experience Protocol behavior: e.g., DNS, DHCP, or routing protocols Wireless and mobility Correlation of measurements across multiple layers, protocols or networks Security and privacy Troubleshooting and anomaly detection Data centers, cloud services, SDNs and NFV Content distribution Characterization & modeling Studies of network usage, or end-host behavior Metrics and measurements of resilience and dependability Techniques for measurements and measurement-based inference of macroscopic Internet structure, dynamics, and evolution Important Dates Paper Registration: October 9, 2015 Paper Submission: October 16, 2015 Notification: December 18, 2015 Organizing Committee General Chair: Xenofontas Dimitropoulos (University of Crete, Greece) Program Chair: Thomas Karagiannis (Microsoft Research, UK) Publicity Chair: Antonis Papadogiannakis (FORTH-ICS, Greece) Website: http://www.ics.forth.gr/pam2016/ <http://www.ics.forth.gr/pam2016/>

1 0

Call for Comments for the Second Draft Service Level Agreement (SLA) for the IANA Numbering Services
by Nick Hyrka 07 Aug '15

07 Aug '15

This message is sent on behalf of the Number Resource Organization (NRO). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALL FOR COMMENTS FOR THE SECOND DRAFT SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (SLA) FOR THE IANA NUMBERING SERVICES NRO – PUBLIC CONSULTATION Open until: 31 August 2015, 23:59 UTC Background On 15 January 2015, the Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal (CRISP) Team submitted the Internet Number Community Proposal to the request for proposals issued by the IANA Stewardship Coordination Group (ICG). One of the key elements of the Internet Number Community proposal is to replace the current NTIA IANA agreement with a new contract, a Service Level Agreement (SLA) between the IANA Numbering Services Operator and the five RIRs. A first draft of the SLA was produced on 1 May 2015 and opened for public comments until June 14th 2015. The first draft of the SLA is available at: https://www.nro.net/sla-v1 Discussions about the development of the SLA have occurred in all RIR meetings at: APNIC 39 (2-6 March 2015), ARIN 35 (12-15 April 2015), RIPE 70 (11-15 May 2015), LACNIC 23 (18-22 May 2015) and AFRINIC 22 (3-5 June 2015). Results of this discussion are documented in the NRO website at: https://www.nro.net/sla-development Second Draft SLA As a result of the public consultation of the first draft of the SLA and the RIR meetings discussions, a second draft of the SLA has been produced and is available at: https://www.nro.net/sla For the sake of clarity, you can find a track changes version with the first draft at: https://www.nro.net/sla-track-changes Additionally, a document with the comments received during the consultation period and the legal team responses is available at: https://www.nro.net/sla-comments All interested parties are now encouraged to review and comment on this second version of the draft proposal; including members of the RIRs, ICANN, and their communities; members of the CRISP Team and the ICG; and any other organisations and individuals. This call for public comments will remain open until 31 August, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. Comments can be submitted by any interested party to the <ianaxfer(a)nro.net> mailing list. Subscription to this list is open and available at: https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer About the Second Draft SLA The draft SLA has been developed by a team of legal experts from different RIRs. It responds to the principles included in the Internet number community proposal and is based on the already existing provisions of the NTIA IANA agreement. The content of this draft is NOT the result of negotiations with ICANN or any other parties. It is written in such a way so that it can be signed as part of the implementation of the IANA transition when this occurs or before, without pre-judging the outcome of the ICG coordinated proposal. The draft includes legally important provisions, such as those that regulate the five RIRs acting together and being responsible collectively before ICANN. It includes background and definitions. This draft SLA also includes explanatory footnotes that reference the source of each article according to the Internet number community proposal principles or the NTIA IANA agreement. Next Steps During this final public comment period, the CRISP team is encouraged to review the draft SLA and its consistency with the principles of the Internet number community proposal. ICANN in particular is encouraged to review the draft in detail, and to submit any and all final comments during this period. All comments received by the deadline will be processed by the legal team of the RIRs and, as appropriate, included in a further and final draft of the SLA which will be presented to ICANN as the proposed final SLA. It is hoped that this document will be agreed by ICANN without further changes.

1 0

Call for Comments on CCWG-Accountability's 2nd Draft Proposal
by Nick Hyrka 04 Aug '15

04 Aug '15

This message is sent on behalf of the Number Resource Organization (NRO). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALL FOR COMMENTS ON CCWG-ACCOUNTABILITY’S 2ND DRAFT PROPOSAL The Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability) has published its 2nd Draft Proposal with proposed improvements to ICANN’s accountability framework. You can find the proposal here: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-draft-2-proposal-work-stre… In a previous public comment period in May 2015, CCWG-Accountability sought feedback on the direction of its proposal and preferences among the alternatives that were proposed. CCWG-Accountability has incorporated this input and is now seeking agreement on whether or not the proposal meets the community’s requirements. The comment period closes on 12 September 2015 at 23:59 UTC. Comments can be submitted via a web page here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-2015-08-03-en Two webinars will be held this week to discuss the proposal on 4 August 2015 from 19:00 – 21:00 UTC and 7 August 2015 from 07:00 – 09:00 UTC. More information is available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54692681 Next Steps After the public comment period ends, CCWG-Accountability will reconvene to continue its work, aiming to finalise the Work Stream 1 proposal before submitting this to the Chartering Organisations and eventually to the ICANN Board of Directors.

1 0

Call for Comments on ICG's Draft IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal
by Nick Hyrka 03 Aug '15

03 Aug '15

This message is sent on behalf of the Number Resource Organisation (NRO). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALL FOR COMMENTS ON ICG’S DRAFT IANA STEWARDSHIP TRANSITION PROPOSAL The IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) has published its draft IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal for public comment: https://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/IANA-stewardship-transition-prop… Comments can be provided via an online form or by emailing <public-comments(a)ianacg.org> until 8 September 2015 at 23:59 (UTC). Comments need not be in-depth, simple statements of support are appreciated. All comments received will be publicly archived. The online form is available here: https://comments.ianacg.org/form More information can be found on the ICG’s public comment page here: https://www.ianacg.org/calls-for-input/combined-proposal-public-comment-per… The ICG will also be hosting two webinars to discuss the proposal on 6 and 7 August 2015. More information is available here: https://www.ianacg.org/iana-stewardship-transition-coordination-group-icg-t… The ICG’s proposal integrates the separate proposals developed by the names, numbers and protocol parameters communities. The Internet Number Community’s Proposal was submitted to the ICG by the Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal (CRISP) Team back in January 2015 and is available here: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/ICG-RFP-Number-Resource-Proposal.pdf The Internet Number Community’s Proposal In the Internet Number Community Proposal, ICANN continues as the IANA Functions Operator for the IANA Numbering Services. A service level agreement between ICANN and the RIRs would be used to ensure that the IANA functions continue to be performed to the Number Community’s requirements. An independent review panel, made up of representatives from each RIR community, periodically reviews ICANN’s performance in meeting these identified service levels. Key priorities here were ensuring stability, security, reliability, quality of service and community empowerment. The community is very satisfied with ICANN’s performance as IANA Functions Operator and, as ICANN’s role is lightweight and purely administrative, there was no need for the proposal to introduce additional operational complexity. More detail can be found in the infographic here: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Number_Community_Proposal_Overview.p… The CRISP Team and the NRO Executive Council are enthusiastic about the progress on the transition so far, and confident that the proposal reflects the will of the Internet Number Community. Next Steps Following the public comment period, the ICG will work on finalising its proposal and intends to publish the final document in October 2015, during ICANN 54 in Dublin. The ICANN Board of Directors will then deliver this document to the NTIA for review. Throughout these next steps, it is important that the Internet Number Community continues to express its views. You can join the NRO IANA Transfer Mailing List <ianaxfer(a)nro.net> to follow the discussions and updates on the process will be published on www.nro.net.

1 0

[news] RIPE Policy Proposals - July Update
by Marco Schmidt 27 Jul '15

27 Jul '15

Dear colleagues, Please find below the monthly overview of open policy proposals and the stage they have reached in the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP). If you wish to join the discussion about a particular proposal, please do so on the relevant working group mailing list. Proposals Open for Discussion: 2015-03, “Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size” - discussion open until 7 August 2015 Proposals in Last Call: 2015-02, “Keep IPv6 PI When Requesting IPv6 Allocation” - Last Call until 6 August 2015 Proposals accepted: 2015-01, “Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations” Proposals Awaiting Input: 2014-03, “Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments” Proposal Overviews: PROPOSAL: 2015-03, “Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size” OVERVIEW: This proposal introduces new criteria for the evaluation of large IPv6 allocation requests. These new criteria are hierarchical and geographical structure and segmentation for security and planned longevity. The current requirements, number of users and extent of infrastructure, are retained. RIPE NCC IMPACT ANALYSIS: Includes the RIPE NCC’s understanding of what are reasonable limits for each of the criteria. STATUS: Review Phase WHERE TO COMMENT: Address Policy Working Group: address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net DEADLINE: 7 August 2015 FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-03 ===== The following proposal is in Last Call. Rough consensus has been declared and the purpose of this phase is to give the community a final opportunity to present any well-justified objections to the proposal that have not already been raised and addressed during the previous discussion phases. PROPOSAL: 2015-02, “Keep IPv6 PI When Requesting IPv6 Allocation” OVERVIEW: This proposal aims to remove the requirement that LIRs should return their IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) assignment when requesting an IPv6 allocation. RIPE NCC IMPACT ANALYSIS: Includes the point that little impact is expected in terms of routing table growth. STATUS: Last Call WHERE TO COMMENT: Address Policy Working Group: address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net DEADLINE: 6 August 2015 FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-02 ===== The following proposal has been accepted since the last RIPE Policy Proposal Update. PROPOSAL: 2015-01, “Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations” OVERVIEW: Currently, IPv4 allocations received from another LIR can only be re-allocated after a 24 months, while IPv4 allocations made by the RIPE NCC can be transferred immediately. This proposal aims to align the transfer requirements by applying the same 24-month holding period to all IPv4 allocations. STATUS: Accepted EXPECTED IMPLEMENTATION: Implemented on 23 July 2015 FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01 ===== The following proposal is awaiting input before it proceeds in the PDP. PROPOSAL: 2014-03, “Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments” OVERVIEW: This proposal aims to ease the requirements when requesting an Autonomous System (AS) Number. To this end, the following actions are proposed: - Remove the need for evaluation - Limit the number of AS Numbers per organisation to 1,000 - Require that 16-bit AS Numbers are multihomed after nine months RIPE NCC IMPACT ANALYSIS: Includes the point that it will be the End User that decides if the need for an AS Number is technically reasonable. STATUS: Review Phase - Awaiting New Proposal Version WHERE TO COMMENT: Address Policy Working Group: address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2014-03 ===== The RIPE NCC provides an overview of current RIPE Policy Proposals on www.ripe.net: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/current-proposals/current-policy-… We look forward to your involvement in the PDP. Kind regards, Marco Schmidt RIPE Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

ASN transfers - 2014-13
by Sergey Myasoedov 22 Jul '15

22 Jul '15

Hello everyone, What is the status of 2014-13 implementation? Are the ASN transfers allowed and handled by the RIPE NCC? I can't find any ASN transfer statistics on the website :( -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov

3 2