- ripe-list - mailman.ripe.net

RIPE DNS Hostcount January 1995
by Mirjam Kuehne 03 Feb '95

03 Feb '95

Dear all, Because Marten left the RIPE NCC :-( I will provide you with the hostcount in the future. I hope I got all information correct. If you see any mistakes please let me know. Here is my first one: the hostcount for January 1995! All output is again available from: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/hostcount Best regards, Mirjam RIPE DNS Hostcount Previous Count : Sat Dec 31 1994 This Count : Tue Jan 31 1995 CY SOA COUNTED DUPL REAL CHANGE ============================================================ al 3 0 0 0 0 at 552 29225 287 28928 + 1624 az 3 16 0 16 + 7 be 310 19383 318 19065 + 1642 bg 20 190 24 166 + 30 by 1 2 0 2 + 1 ch 359 52599 363 52236 + 2417 cy 8 87 0 87 + 87 cz 195 11854 180 11674 + 1277 de 2779 215460 6192 209268 +10417 dk 299 27698 350 27348 + 8942 dz 2 10 0 10 0 ee 67 1425 9 1416 + 262 eg 6 170 2 168 + 15 es 477 27268 228 27040 - 538 fi 618 73645 2006 71639 + 3377 fo 1 2 0 2 + 2 fr 1181 95548 1436 94112 +10752 gb 1 27 0 27 + 1 ge 1 0 0 0 0 gr 193 4240 210 4030 + 514 hr 84 1652 196 1456 + 412 hu 116 8707 46 8661 + 1835 ie 96 6413 86 6327 + 841 il 244 13984 342 13642 + 1006 is 82 4795 38 4757 + 230 it 936 33461 1127 32334 + 3964 li 4 30 3 0 - 27 lt 17 158 3 155 + 28 lu 41 620 5 615 + 109 lv 29 626 8 618 + 94 ma 1 0 0 0 0 mk 1 0 0 0 0 mt 1 0 0 0 0 nl 741 91753 2474 89279 + 3336 no 831 51701 1439 50262 + 1898 pl 453 12290 937 11353 + 587 pt 130 5589 68 5521 + 467 ro 41 538 40 498 - 24 ru 224 2308 208 2100 + 368 se 1024 81893 2235 79658 + 5594 si 109 1893 60 1833 + 206 sk 84 1594 31 1563 + 147 su 268 5429 297 5132 + 327 tn 3 64 7 57 + 3 tr 70 2168 47 2121 + 238 ua 78 702 100 602 + 73 uk 2846 263574 23275 240299 +14239 va 0 0 0 0 0 yu 3 0 0 0 0 ============================================================ 15633 1150791 44677 1106077 +76780 This is an overview of the History of the RIPE hostcounts. It only contains the totals. The totals for 1990-1991 should be considered rather unstable and unreliable because the program used then was not really tuned, plus the count was not done as regularly as it is now. Count : total hostcount for all European top level domains Delta : delta since previous count Delta % : delta as percentage of previous count Q Delta : delta over the past quarter Q Delta%: delta over last quarter as percentage of end of last quarter count For the Q Deltas I have not calculated those back before 1992, because the figures for 1990-1991 are not too reliable. *) Dec 1991 hostcount estimated at 135,000. Count Delta Delta % Q Delta Q Delta % ------------------------------------------------------------------- Oct 1990 31724 Nov 1990 33665 + 1941 + 6.1% Dec 1990 29230 - 4435 - 13.2% Jan 1991 43832 + 14602 + 50.0% Feb 1991 - Mar 1991 44506 + 674 + 1.5% Apr 1991 46948 + 2442 + 5.5% May 1991 - Jun 1991 63267 + 16319 + 34.8% Jul 1991 - Aug 1991 73069 + 9802 + 15.5% Sep 1991 92834 + 19765 + 27.0% Oct 1991 104824 + 11990 + 12.9% Nov 1991 129652 + 24828 + 23.7% Dec 1991 - Jan 1992 141308 + 11656 + 9.0% Feb 1992 161434 + 20126 + 14.2% Mar 1992 167939 + 6505 + 4.0% + 32939 *) + 24.4% *) Apr 1992 170050 + 2111 + 1.3% May 1992 182528 + 12478 + 7.3% Jun 1992 196758 + 14230 + 7.8% + 28819 + 17.2% Jul 1992 213017 + 16259 + 8.3% Aug 1992 221951 + 8934 + 4.2% Sep 1992 232522 + 10571 + 4.8% + 35764 + 18.2% Oct 1992 254585 + 22063 + 9.5% Nov 1992 271795 + 17210 + 6.8% Dec 1992 284374 + 12579 + 4.6% + 51852 + 22.3% Jan 1993 303828 + 19454 + 6.8% Feb 1993 322902 + 19074 + 6.3% Mar 1993 355140 + 32238 + 10.0% + 70766 + 24.9% Apr 1993 366164 + 11024 + 3.1% May 1993 385522 + 19358 + 5.3% Jun 1993 404930 + 19408 + 5.0% + 49790 + 14.0% Jul 1993 426827 + 21897 + 5.4% Aug 1993 451116 + 24289 + 5.7% Sep 1993 469356 + 18240 + 4.0% + 64424 + 15.9% Oct 1993 500018 + 30662 + 6.5% Nov 1993 533701 + 33683 + 6.7% Dec 1993 553357 + 19656 + 3.7% + 84001 + 17.9% Jan 1994 587135 + 33778 + 6.1% Feb 1994 623158 + 36023 + 6.1% Mar 1994 655164 + 32006 + 5.1% +101807 + 18.4% Apr 1994 693346 + 38182 + 5.8% May 1994 735317 + 41971 + 6.1% Jun 1994 760385 + 25076 + 3.4% +105221 + 16.1% Jul 1994 789747 + 29362 + 3.8% Aug 1994 834945 + 45198 + 5.7% Sep 1994 888398 + 53453 + 6.4% +128013 + 16.8% Oct 1994 924679 + 36281 + 4.1% Nov 1994 973100 + 48421 + 5.2% Dec 1994 1029270 + 56170 + 5.8% +140872 + 15.9% Jan 1995 1106077 + 76780 + 7.5%

1 0

Re: DANTE CERT Service
by keld＠dkuug.dk 20 Jan '95

20 Jan '95

Peter2 writes: > Or (a more positive note) is DANTE the right organization to > do the collection of money and subcontract the actual work > to another organization taht all parties trust to do the > (necessarily sensitive) coordination service right? > I do not think DANTE is the right organisation. DANTE represents govermentally subsidised academic networks, which are now entering the commercial networking market, in conflict with EU fair competition legislation, according to my view. We do not see DANTE as being neutral at all, which is required for the role proposed. Keld Simonsen

1 0

Apologies for resent mail
by Tim Grimer 20 Jan '95

20 Jan '95

Many apologies for some 16 messages sent by accident to this list. We know of only one way this could have occured. At Unipalm, our windows based mail application allows you to "Drag-and-drop" selected groups of mail messages to folders. Unfortunately, it is possible to drop messages into the out-tray by accident at which point they are promptly sent. Peter Dawe has a separate mail account, Peter2, which is used by his Personal Assistant to organise the large volume of mail he receives daily. The unwanted mail came from there. We are taking steps to make sure that mail cannot originate from this source in the future. Tim Grimer. Unipalm Postmaster.

1 0

RIPE meeting special request
by RIPE NCC Staff 20 Jan '95

20 Jan '95

Dear All, I would like to ask your help at the forthcoming RIPE meeting. I am "retiring" from the minute-taking task at this and future RIPE meetings :-). Instead, David Kessens our new colleague will be doing this. Since this is his first time, I will of course be helping him, but it would be great if everyone who is giving a presentation could coordinate with David and with the Working Group chairs so that the task of collecting all the information for the minutes is made easier for him. Your help is much appreciated. (aplogies to anyone who gets this message twice) Kind Regards, Anne RIPE NCC

1 0

RIPE20 : Terminal room facilities
by RIPE NCC Staff 20 Jan '95

20 Jan '95

Terminal-room facilities during the RIPE-meeting. ------------------------------------------------- Time allowing, we will provide a terminal room during the RIPE meeting. There will be a number of ASCII terminals connected to a terminal-server (hef-ts1.nikhef.nl or hef-ts2.nikhef.nl), which will allow for telnet access. We will also provide ethernet tap points for laptop computers. 10base2 and 10baseT will be provided. 110V will be available too, on request of some of our guests from other continents. We will assign static IP addresses to persons to avoid having to reconfigure their machines. People in need of a 'permanent' IP address for the time of the meeting should send a message to <ncc(a)ripe.net> with 'Terminalroom' in the subject; the addresses will be assigned on-site. People that need to have access lists changed should allow access from 192.16.199.0/24 and 193.0.0.0/24. Printer access will be provided via an uuencoded-file-via-mail gateway. Unfortunately, Apple localtalk access cannot be provided, sorry. We're not trying to match an IETF terminal room, but if you have special requests in this area, please send them to us. Kind regards, Geert Jan de Groot

1 0

Re: CIX Europe?
by Bernard.Tuy＠renater.fr 19 Jan '95

19 Jan '95

| From: Havard Eidnes <Havard.Eidnes(a)runit.sintef.no> | | If you are specifically thinking of the route you have to follow to | get from res.enst.fr to e.g. ub4b.eunet.be, well, ask the respective | parties and find out why they appear to be dragging their feet. (My | somewhat old information tells me that an interconnection was planned, | and for all I know it may still be planned.) ====BT: you *were* right but from now the peering between Eunet and Ebone is running thru Vienna-EBS and not only planned ... Cheers, +Bernard Tuy.

1 0

Re: CIX Europe?
by Bernard.Tuy＠renater.fr 18 Jan '95

18 Jan '95

> Can anyone tell me why there isn't a CIX in Europe? Or >perhaps one is in the works? ====BT: That's a matter of fact that there is no one but many GIXes (not CIXes -as every kind of traffic is allowed : academic and commercial) at the moment all over Europe ... the nearest from you is located in Paris (where Oleane, Phynet and Renater are connected and exchanging traffic, soon will be connected there too : Pipex, Transpac-Fr and Eunet-Fr). Other GIXes are already running : London, Amsterdam, Stockholm and Geneva -for the most well known. +Bernard Tuy. \Renater-CIC/

1 0

Re: CIX Europe?
by Havard Eidnes 18 Jan '95

18 Jan '95

> Can anyone tell me why there isn't a CIX in Europe? Or > perhaps one is in the works? Well, there are a number of interconnect points in Europe, the one in London being one, the ones in Stockholm, Amsterdam and Paris (and Oslo, Helsinki and Copenhagen) being other ones. There are probably more. Some of these are there mainly (or solely) to give more efficient connectivity internally in a country, some of them have a wider scope. > This may seem like an ignorant question (or at least, > "politically uninformed"), but it seems abhorent to me that all > the various commerical providers in Europe have to pull lines to > Alexandria, VA (or wherever) to connect to each other. The network service providers in Europe have a need to go to the US anyway, and widening the US capacity may be cheaper than buying corresponding europe-internal international capacity (sad but true). This is however only one side of the issue. The issue is also one of priorities, money and (gee ;-) politics. I can't see that we wouldn't have the same problems with a CIX in Europe as we have with the currently established Internet exchange points. Please also note that the "CIX" concept has some perceived extra baggage (e.g. the original concrete implementation) that some people feel we are better off without. If you are specifically thinking of the route you have to follow to get from res.enst.fr to e.g. ub4b.eunet.be, well, ask the respective parties and find out why they appear to be dragging their feet. (My somewhat old information tells me that an interconnection was planned, and for all I know it may still be planned.) - Havard

1 0

Re: CIX Europe?
by bob＠informatics.rutherford.ac.uk 18 Jan '95

18 Jan '95

> at least for demon, pipex, bt and ukerna it does.... and for EUmet Britain. Basically any (UK) primary service provider is free to join if it wishes. Bob

1 0

34-155 MBIT Interconnection of Research Networks - Call for proposals
by martin＠terena.nl 18 Jan '95

18 Jan '95

These notes are from a talk given as part of the Telematics Applications programme information days in Brussels on the 17th January 1995 where the launch of a call for proposals for provision of a 34/155 M bits/s network was launched jointly by DGXIII and DGIII. These are my own notes. I make no guarantees for their correctness and you should consult the references given (and not me!) for more information. Queries about the Telematics Applications programme should be directed to: telematics(a)dg13.cec.be. Please feel free to forward this message to other interested parties. Regards, John Interconnection of European Research and University Networks ------------------------------------------------------------ at 34 and 155 Mbits/s --------------------- Call for proposals. The Workprogramme for Telematics Applications for Research included a series of tasks (RE 1.1 to RE 1.3) which defined the validation of a trans-European network of 34 Mbits/s, progressing to 155 Mbits/s. The validation of this network has now become a joint initiative between DGXIII (Telematics Applications Programme) and DGIII (ESPRIT). A call for proposals for the validation of this network has now been launched. The closing date for submissions of proposals is the 15th March. The complimentary information concerning these specific tasks and accompanying the Telematics Applications Call for Proposals can be seen at: http://www.terena.nl/telematics/rtdninfo.html The Telematics Applications Call for Proposals can be seen at: http://www.terena.nl/telematics/cfp.html 1. Funding and Timing --------------------- * A collaborative approach between users and suppliers is encouraged. * The action will have a duration of 2 years. * The action will be a shared cost action. The EC is expected to fund up to 50% of the cost in the first year and up to 30% in the second year. * The total budgetary contribution from the EC is expected to be a maximum of 30 MECU for the 2 years. This contribution by the EC is seen as a starting block for a high- bandwidth network service in Europe. It is expected that the people who make use of this network will eventually have to pay for it. There will be a continuation phase after the initial 2 years but at a lower level. 2. Consortia Composition ------------------------ * European Telecoms operators and service providers. * National Research Networks in Europe operating at, or planning to operate at 34 M bits/s (or higher). * It is essential that there is evidence of consultation with user representatives. 3. Content of proposal ---------------------- The proposal must contain: * Description of technical approach. * Timescales for operational deployment. * Details of the technology to be deployed (both initially and at later stages). * Approach to service provision and quality management. (The EC will specify service and quality levels but not technology.) * Approach to trans-Atlantic connections. * Approach to maintaining connections to the existing European national research networks operating at lower speeds. * Access by academic and industrial researchers (but _not_ industry). Acceptable use policy (AUP). * Approach to connectivity between multiple high-speed pilots. --end John

1 0