I am not sure if anyone should support CVE Foundation yet. You don't build
trust just by founding yet-another-foundation and put CVE into the name. Not
might not be a best choice as of now.
forward.
from a private thread:
}The CVE Foundation has been formed to fund the CVE effort, due to
}"longstanding concerns among members of the CVE Board about the
}sustainability and neutrality of a globally relied-upon resource being tied
}to a single government sponsor.":
I had previous opioned that it was time for EC/EU (maybe NATO) to take on
funding this, and to move/replicate the effort outside of MITRE.
That was before I knew of the foundation.
I think that MITRE has done the best job possible ... for a beltway
entity... but that it hasn't been very helpful. 3h webinar required to learn
what a CVE is before you can get allocations.
yes, useful to the unwashed C* masses...
I'm of the opinion that RIPE can and ought to take on a role here as
representatives of the ISP operator community. Both in a leadership role and
and this email is BCC'ed to them.
(Many open source projects get dozens to hundreds of "potential" CVEs from
fuzzers who need a CVE number assigned in order to claim a bounty. There is
now a cottage industry of fuzzers. It's a perverse result of the bounty
programs... creating a huge amount of work to review potential issues, which
often are impossible to actually exploit... and never come with fixes)
--
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
-----
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings.
Attachments: