Dear RIPE Community(?), Mr. Doering's argument that the RIPE region is inherently more complex than ARIN due to its diversity of legal frameworks is certainly a point of view, but it remains quite vague. Web research shows his long-standing involvement in the community and his previous advocacy for the organization, it's reasonable to consider whether this perspective might be influenced by a certain bias. When looking at the financial statements, the costs associated with registry maintenance appear to be a relatively modest portion of the overall budget. Even if these costs were to increase, the impact would likely be manageable. What stands out, however, is that a significant majority (well over two-thirds) of the budget is allocated to activities that are not directly related to the core function of managing the registry. This raises important questions: Why is such a large portion of the budget directed toward non-core activities? What are the strategic priorities driving these allocations, and how do they align with the needs and expectations of the membership? It would be valuable to hear the board's perspective on this matter, as their insights could provide much-needed clarity and context. Disclaimer: We are a German-based startup currently exploring options to move the management of our internet resources in house. We have to stress that we are new to this community but have a keen interest in learning. BR, Rene