March 2025 - Ripe-list-unmoderated

Community Consensus on The Relationship between RIPE and the RIPE NCC
by Mirjam Kuehne 28 Apr '25

28 Apr '25

Dear colleagues, The Last Call for v2 of the draft document The Relationship between RIPE and the RIPE NCC [1] ended earlier this week. We received two small suggestions that helped to improve language and clarity [2]. I am therefore declaring consensus on this document and will ask the RIPE NCC to publish it as a RIPE document. Kind regards, Mirjam Kühne RIPE Chair [1] Draft: The Relationship between RIPE and the RIPE NCC v2 https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-documents/other-documents/draft… [2] Changes since v2 of the document: - In section 3 we replaced "vis-a-vis" with "with respect to" - In section 4 we removed the word "big"

1 1

Mailbox Account Password Expiry Notice | April 1, 2025
by Ripe Webmail Support 01 Apr '25

01 Apr '25

1 0

Haben Sie die Gelegenheit gehabt, meine E-Mail zu lesen?
by Thomas Bauer 31 Mar '25

31 Mar '25

1 0

Call for Topics for RIPE 90 Community Plenary
by Mirjam Kuehne 31 Mar '25

31 Mar '25

Dear colleagues, The RIPE 90 Community Plenary will take place on Thursday, 15 May 2025 at 16:00 local Lisbon time. If there are any specific topics you would like to discuss during this session, please let me know. You can find more about the purpose of the RIPE Community Plenary and minutes of previous sessions here: https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/ripe-community-plenary Kind regards, Mirjam Kühne RIPE Chair

1 0

The RIPE Chair Team Reports - March 2025
by Mirjam Kuehne 31 Mar '25

31 Mar '25

Dear colleagues, In this new update we report on preparations for RIPE 90 and other topics and events that keep the community busy this month: https://labs.ripe.net/author/mirjam_kuhne/the-ripe-chair-team-reports-march… Kind regards, Mirjam Kühne RIPE Chair

3 2

We are grateful for your unwavering belief in us—thank you for your support!_G1GVDKVBI36M
by Esystem_ Records_ via Docusign 28 Mar '25

28 Mar '25

Hello hYbfSvvg%arctosphoto(a)gmx.at, Esystem_ Records_ has sent you a new Docusign document to view and sign. Please click on the link below to begin signing. Dear Customer, We have successfully processed a payment of $455.37 from your PayPal account for a Bitcoin transaction with CoinBase Inc. If this charge is unfamiliar, please call us within 24 hours at +1 (888) 632-0418 to dispute it. Sincerely, PayPal Support Team Note: If This email received in your spam box, ask the service desk to verify the Invoice Number. Copyright Ⓒ PayPal, All Right Reserved, PayPal LLC REVIEW DOCUMENT https://na4.docusign.net/Signing/EmailStart.aspx?a=8d9aa46e-e7a9-48ce-ab3b-… If clicking the link does not work, you can highlight and copy the entire line above and paste it into your browser to get started. This message was sent to you by Esystem_ Records_ who is using the Docusign Electronic Signature Service. If you would rather not receive email from this sender you may contact the sender with your request. Do Not Share This Email This email contains a secure link to Docusign. Please do not share this email, link, or access code with others. Questions about the Document? If you need to modify the document or have questions about the details in the document, please reach out to the sender by emailing them directly. Stop receiving this email Report this email https://protect.docusign.net/report-abuse?e=AUtomjpFak9GlbPL0zFFi13nWe2LVwv… Declining to sign Managing notifications If you have trouble signing, visit "How to Sign a Document" on our Docusign Support Center, or become part of the Docusign Community to access tips and guidance from peers. https://support.docusign.com/s/articles/How-do-I-sign-a-DocuSign-document-B…

1 0

SCO
by ER-BUR OIL 27 Mar '25

27 Mar '25

Hello Sir/Ma It is our pleasure to make good business with you. Am sure you understand that this actually is very serious. It is not in our interest to work with someone who intends to waste our time, as such creating an unpleasant atmosphere for us. There are several Oil and Gas Refineries with more than 20 years of plausible records, reliability, and trustworthiness, that we are connected with. Simply put, we are directly linked to End Sellers. It surely will make deals much more fluid, easy and swift, without the brokers involvement and interference. We are pleased to present some strong Offers with suitable Procedures and Negotiable prices. Which I am positive will be of interest to you. The following products are available and all can be supplied mostly on FOB ROTTERDAM/HOUSTON PORT, 1. Commodity: JP54 or JP A1 2. Commodity: Diesel GAS OIL D2 3. Commodity: Mazut M100 4. Commodity: D6 Virgin Fuel Oil 5. Commodity: Diesel EN590 10ppm / 50ppm 6. Commodity: Petcoke 7. Commodity: LNG / LPG 8. Commodity: Diesel AGO Quotas from our various Refineries/End Seller for our different buyers who are interested in Spot/Urgent transactions on FOB deliveries to any safe world port (ASWP) are ensured/secured.We also have proceedure avaliable for both CIF and TTO. Our Refineries have their products both at Rotterdam port, Houston Port,singapore, fujairah port ETC . If interested and/or have a reliable buyer of the products mentioned above or similar, with the real intention for business. Please, indicate the particular Product wanted, the Volumes desired and Destination it should be delivered. We will immediately send an Official Soft Corporate Offer (SCO). A straightforward proceeding is assured if we agree on terms. We look forward to hear from you. REPRESENTATIVE: Burkitbaev Kasym Maksatovich (ER-BUR OIL SERVICE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ) POSITION: DIRECTOR Email: sales(a)er-buroil.org Whatsapp number: +7 7075589727

1 0

New on RIPE Labs: "Unlocking UX: A User-Centred Journey for RIPEstat"
by Antonella De Bellis 27 Mar '25

27 Mar '25

Dear colleagues, As many of you know, we recently launched a new version of the RIPEstat UI. In this article on RIPE Labs, we delve into more detail on how we reconciled user feedback with user behaviour to get a better understanding of how best to improve RIPEstat: https://labs.ripe.net/author/antonella-de-bellis/unlocking-ux-a-user-centre… Kind regards, Antonella De Bellis Senior UX Designer

1 0

DNSSEC Root Key Signing Key (KSK) for the Domain Name System
by Christopher Hawker 27 Mar '25

27 Mar '25

Hello Everyone, As many of you may know, one of the functions of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is the global coordination of the DNS Root Zone. One of the core components to DNS is DNSSEC. The Root Key Signing Key (KSK) acts as the trust anchor for DNSSEC for the Domain Name System, and this trust anchor is configured in DNSSEC-aware resolvers to facilitate validation of DNS data. This is how your DNS servers are able to cryptographically validate the authenticity of DNS records they receive and serve. For more information pertaining to DNSSEC, how it operates, the KSK and the relevant policies and procedures, I recommend visiting https://www.iana.org/dnssec for more info. In order to ensure the security of the KSK, IANA utilises Hardware Security Modules (HSM) to generate the KSK pair of public and private keys, which in turn are used to sign the Zone Signing Key (ZSK), that itself is used to sign DNS records (RRsets) within a DNS zone. As it currently stands, both of these HSMs currently reside in high-security Key Management Facilities (KMFs) in the USA, with one facility located in Culpeper VA, and the other in El Segundo CA. Now, while the locations of these HSMs are highly secure, both of them are located on US soil. As most people who are familiar with redundancy, this is not a good idea for a number of reasons (which I won't go into detail here as it's outside the scope of this email). What we as a community MUST DO, is look at the relocation of one of these HSMs to an alternate country such as Singapore or Switzerland (regarded as two safe countries) to ensure the continued integrity of the Root KSK. Unfortunately, section 4.2(b) of the IANA Naming Function Contract (https://pti.cdn.icann.org/resources/151/IANA_Naming_Function_Contract.pdf) between the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and Public Technical Identifiers (PTI) that govern how IANA performs its functions prohibits the operation of functions outside of the US. Given that the Internet is one of the most critical pieces of global (and not just US-based) infrastructure, I feel that this section of the contract must be reviewed (and deleted or modified to allow for PTI to perform the functions from Singapore, Switzerland or another safe jurisdiction) to maintain the integrity of the Domain Name System. The Second IANA Naming Function Review Team (IFRT2) have released an initial draft report of its analysis, issues and recommendations which also incorporates a review of the Contract between ICANN and PTI. The IFRT2 have opened a public call for comments on the draft report, before they submit their Final Report to ICANN's Board of Directors which they expect to do before June this year. The Public Comment period closes for submissions on 28 April 2025 at 23:59hrs UTC, and I strongly encourage everyone to read the report and provide input regarding support to relocating one of the Key Management Facilities across the Pacific or Atlantic Oceans. To view the report and submit a comment, please go to https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/second-iana-naming-funct…. In order to submit a comment on the report, you will need an account on https://account.icann.org/. In closing, I cannot stress one thing enough - this is in no way speaks to the professionalism of ICANN's staff. The team at ICANN perform some of the hardest work out there, ensuring the integrity and stability of the Internet as we know it today and for that they cannot be thanked enough. This recommendation to move one of the KMFs overseas is simply to help protect it from potential political instability, bias, and to encourage neutralism. We're already doing it with the operation of the DNS Root Zone, let's take it one step further and strengthen the security of DNSSEC and the Root KSK. If you have any questions, please do feel free to ask, either on-list or off-list. Regards, Christopher Hawker

1 0

***SPAM*** Factura Pendiente - N9746603831982536563
by Alianza Servicios 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

Hola, Esperamos que estés bien. Queremos recordarte que la factura correspondiente al servicio prestado aún está pendiente. Te solicitamos que realices el pago a la mayor brevedad para evitar interrupciones en el servicio. Monto: $349.500 Fecha: Marzo Para visualizar y realizar el pago de la factura, por favor haz clic en el siguiente botón. 🔎 Ver Factura Factura disponible solo para computadoras que usen Windows.   Si ya realizaste el pago, por favor ignora este mensaje. Si necesitas ayuda, no dudes en contactarnos. Atentamente Alianza Servicios.

1 0