Re: [ripe-chair-discuss] In-person discussion of RIPE Chair Selection (was: RIPE Chair Job description)

All - I take side with Shane and Jim here: I cannot see any need to rush this trough. It shall get the time it needs - as I am sure no one intends to stretch this over the next decade. And my reading of Shane's proposal for aiming at RIPE 75 rather than 74 was that it's purely inidicative but not mandatory. Best, -C. On 21.10.2016 14:05, Shane Kerr wrote:

Filiz & all,

tl;dr I think we need an in-person discussion of the procedure. We need to have the discussion at RIPE 73, or defer using the procedure until we have had the discussion.

More words:

[...]

Cheers,

-- Shane