Hi, (inline) On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Brian Nisbet wrote:
While I quite like the shape of Filiz's suggestions I would be very careful of the level of input given to the NCC Management and/or Board. While the RIPE Chair has to work very closely with the NCC, this is a Community decision and must be clearly seen as same.
+1
If we do go for a NomCom I'd be inclined to suggest the WG Chairs, the RIPE PC and possibly the community selected NRO members.
+1
I would very much agree with the conflict of interest provisions extending to RIPE PC and WG Chairs. Albeit it is easier for them to step down than for a permanent NCC staff member! Of course if a candidate comes from one of the groups who are making up a NomCom, then they should, at the very least, recluse themselves from that whole process.
+1
Thanks,
Brian
Just a few cents to add: When talking about the PC, probably involving the non-permanent/(s)elect*d PC members -- i.e. RIPE meeting hosts (from the last *N* meetings) -- could broaden up a bit the community support (and diversity?). Cheers, Carlos