Re: [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4

I like this document a lot, especially the bit about using pragmatism and common sense. We need to see much more of this. [ie Keep asking ourselves “what would Rob do?”.] One thing that worries me is the selection committee making the final decision. I think that has to be for the RIPE community as a whole. ie The selection committee recommends the candidate(s) and the community endorses that recommendation. There should be a cleaner separation of roles here. It might also be an idea to insert some text after the bit about the WGCC appointing an interim Chairman, say that stuckee’s term only lasts long enough for the selection procedure to run and appoint a repalcement.