On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Jim Reid wrote:
On 15 Nov 2016, at 22:49, Carlos Friacas <cfriacas@fccn.pt> wrote:
Either asking the WG Chair with more time on his/her record on that role/group to step up as Vice-Chair, or run an election process if two (or more) WG Chairs wish to become Vice-Chair on the same opportunity, sounds acceptable to me.
Please don't talk about "elections" in this specific context. We have to decide on the *selection* process first. An election is just one of many possibilities of selecting the candidate(s). Until we have consensus that election is the way to proceed -- and I hope we never converge on that option -- it is inappropriate to talk about electing the RIPE (Vice) Chair.
Hi Jim, All, What i stated previously is that running some sort of restricted (s)election would be something that wouldn't shock me. Regards, Carlos