Jim,

I understand this concern and tried to address it thus:

„This is not intended to fully describe the activities of the RIPE chair
nor to prescribe the actions of the RIPE chair in any way.
The ordering is not intended to convey any meaning either.“
... „such as“ ...

The list of examples has significant descriptive power and originates from substantive comments, as I have mentioned earlier. 

Does this address your concern?

If not see me and we will address this interactively. 

Daniel
---
Sent from a handheld device.

On 17. Oct 2018, at 12:04, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:



On 17 Oct 2018, at 09:29, Daniel Karrenberg <dfk@ripe.net> wrote:

Considered that after you said it before. Decided to leave it in because examples make it more clear and hph felt it was important to tie in the PC, also for clarity.

My apologies for not pointing this out earlier.

OK Daniel. My concern about providing an illustrative list is the potential it offers for shed painting and whatabootery*. Or, years later, our original intentions get forgotten and people then think that delegation is only allowed to the entities on the list.

* A Scottish word for raising non-sequiturs: "what about..."