Re: [atlas] [WARNING! RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER] Incorrect location of probe #6422
BTW it's an anchor. I guess that location of anchors should be double-checked as they play important role. Regards, Grzegorz From: "Ponikierski, Grzegorz" <gponikie@akamai.com> Date: Tuesday 2019-05-07 at 17:37 To: "ripe-atlas@ripe.net" <ripe-atlas@ripe.net> Subject: [WARNING! RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER] [atlas] Incorrect location of probe #6422 Hi all! According to Atlas probe #6422 is located in Los Angeles but from measurements it's clear that probe is in Miami. Can somebody relay this information to probe owner to fix location? Regards, Grzegorz
Dar all - could I please kindly ask everybody who is subscribed to this as well as to any other mailing list and whose employer sports an email system that heavily alter an email subject by adding "WARNINGS" about "EXTERNAL SENDERS" and the likes to revert the subject back to what it was before sending a reply? I find it particularly odd if such additions more than double the subject length. In any case it makes it harder to read. Thanks and best, -C. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [atlas] [WARNING! RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER] Incorrect location of probe #6422 Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 15:39:58 +0000 From: Ponikierski, Grzegorz <gponikie@akamai.com> To: ripe-atlas@ripe.net <ripe-atlas@ripe.net> BTW it's an anchor. I guess that location of anchors should be double-checked as they play important role. Regards, Grzegorz *From: *"Ponikierski, Grzegorz" <gponikie@akamai.com> *Date: *Tuesday 2019-05-07 at 17:37 *To: *"ripe-atlas@ripe.net" <ripe-atlas@ripe.net> *Subject: *[WARNING! RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER] [atlas] Incorrect location of probe #6422 Hi all! According to Atlas probe #6422 is located in Los Angeles but from measurements it's clear that probe is in Miami. Can somebody relay this information to probe owner to fix location? Regards, Grzegorz
participants (2)
-
Carsten Schiefner
-
Ponikierski, Grzegorz