10 Nov
2015
10 Nov
'15
1:20 p.m.
On 2015-11-10 11:18, Stephan Wolf wrote:
ANCHOR as an VM would really make sense. What do you think about this ?
I think this would really be a BAD idea! The anchors are meant to be more capable and more stable than the candy probes. Messing around with that concept should not be done, imho.
Just my 2 cents .-)
...same here :-) Wilfried PS: I myself do see the beauty of the idea to virtualize the (candy-)probes, but I have - already a while ago - been convinced that the data generated by them should *not* be mixed in with the data from those under full NCC control. And whether those VM probes should even be catalogued by the NCC is another open question.
Cheers, Stephan