(Epilogue: User error - my router stopped handing out IPv6 addresses (curse you, Linksys E4200 v1)) Thanks to Robert K. for rebooting my units. I still need to get to the other site and find out why the IPv6 is failing. On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Phillip Remaker <remaker@gmail.com> wrote:
I currently have a case open where two of my probes on IPv6 networks have no IPv6 address.
I was thinking I might reboot them or force an address probe but can't see an obvious way to do that remotely.
Ironically, my one probe that reports IPv6 capability has only a ULA address :-/
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
On Jun 11, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Klaus Darilion < klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at> wrote:
Am 11.06.2014 15:44, schrieb Daniel Karrenberg:
On 11.06.14 14:54 , Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 01:16:21PM +0200, Antoin Verschuren <ripe@antoin.nl> wrote a message of 18 lines which said:
some tags like anchor or hasipv6 could be filled automagicaly. For "hasipv6", it is more complicated than it seems
Hence IPV6WORKS. ;-) Actually I never would want to make any IPv6 test from a probe which does not have the IPV6WORKS tag. Thus, probes which are known to knot work, should never be selected for measurements.
I “generally” agree with this. “IPv6-works” is defined as can contact greater than 50% of atlas anchors. (I’m surprised at how little traffic my anchors see).
- Jared