On 14.11.2013, at 17:47 , Gilles Massen <gilles.massen@restena.lu> wrote:
On 11/14/2013 10:19 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
With hindsight(!) this shows that adding and removing probes in existing measurements was probably not such a good design choice, although I supported it in order to allow repleneshing the probe pool of long-running measurements.
From a simple user point of view I have mixed feelings toward that feature: on one hand it would prevent long running measurements from decaying, on the other hand if you run (multiple) measurements on a specific set of probes you might not want them to drift apart.
Don't worry. No matter how we implement it, it will be configurable. e.g.: if the number of probes drops below a configurable threshold one will have the option to stop the measurement or replenish. Or one can do nothing until there is no probe left.
Gilles
-- Fondation RESTENA - DNS-LU 6, rue Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg tel: (+352) 424409 fax: (+352) 422473