30 Jun
2014
30 Jun
'14
12:11 p.m.
On 2014/06/27 22:31 , Randy Bush wrote:
apologies. i guess it was in the paper not the preso, uppr right of page 3 of
C. Pelsser, L. Cittadini, S. Vissicchio, and R. Bush, From Paris to Tokyo: On the Suitability of Ping to Measure Latency, 2013 Internet Measurement Conference. <http://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2013/papers/imc125s-pelsserA.pdf>
the intuition is that it is a function of the richness of the path diversity.
perhaps a tunable?
The way it looks to me is that that section argues that you need more than 6 and that 32 is enough. It doesn't really say that 16 is not enough :-) But I just created an internal ticket to have the limit raised to 64. That should be ample for anybody who wants to experiment. Philip