On 2014.01.15. 15:46, Wilfried Woeber wrote:
Robert Kisteleki wrote:
[...]
given the "lazy" approach :-)
As a general rule, we keep the firmware versions in sync across hardware revisions in order to have the same capabilities available. The current situation is a bit of an exception, but that's only because we needed to deploy a new firmware for one hardware version only; functionally there's no difference.
I just noticed that our (old tech) anchor is still more than one version behind.
Is there some sort of schedule to make them load the update eventually, in case they do not disconnect "regularly". Which is sort of expected behaviour for Anchors, imho :-)
Wilfried.
Yes, good point, we'll be a bit more aggressive with Anchors :-) (And the morhogenetic field seems to be strong today, I hear our engineers have discussed this just this afternoon...) Robert