On 2011.12.21. 12:21, Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu> wrote:
Dear All, 6to4 should not used any longer. However it would be nice to see how 6to4 usage decreasing over the time....
I agree. It may be interesting to see its eventual sunset, which is already showing up according to Google's stats:
It seems that there is interest for doing this measurement, so we'll add it to the list -- most likely in January, after the holiday break.
Also, quoting Robert Kisteleki:
" We are aware that in some cases the lookup has a surprising result. One example is 6to4: for IPv6 related ASNs the prefix is 2002::/16 but the ASN can be misleading. We'll most likely stop looking up ASNs for 6to4 (and Teredo) prefixes. If you see anomalies *not* related to this, you can let us know at atlas-dev@ripe.net "
it is unclear (to me) how much interest and resources should be put into these measurements.
With the current setup we have enough control that setting up a new system-wide measurement is not difficult. However, we have to balance the usefulness of such measurements with the measurement capacity they consume. Regards, Robert