13 Nov
2013
13 Nov
'13
9:05 p.m.
On 11/13/13, 11:58 AM, Gilles Massen wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On 13/11/13, 19:26 , Andreas Strikos wrote: >> Hi Gilles, >> >> after some more investigation I spotted another problem related to the >> the group measurements. I released a hot fix and this should be fixed >> now but the initial problem still remains. The frequency, though, of >> faulty scheduling will be reduced. > Good, thanks for looking into it. > >> In the meantime if you or any other that is over-credited due to this >> bug please send us a mail and we can easily reimburse yours credits. > I will survive :) > >> I hope this answers your question :) > Well, almost. I'm not entirely clear on how to setup my new measurement > - considering that I'd want to have about 8 UDMs sharing the same set of > probes (or a good approximation). Since you fixed it almost entirely, > but not quite, should I retry the 'setup in one go' or rather do them > individually and chose the probes from the first UDM? Try as you used to, with grouping (in one go as you said). As I said, the faulty scheduling frequency should be low now. > best, > Gilles > > Regards, Andreas