- ripe-atlas - mailman.ripe.net

8.8.8.8 hijack and ripe atlas
by Jared Mauch 20 Mar '14

20 Mar '14

It appears there are some public measurements like #1002630, and i'm curious if someone is able to look at the latency and TTL numbers of the transport side and observe the localized hijacking of 8.8.8.8. The dataset is somewhat huge and i'm not a json master so trying to discern if there is evidence in there is something i'm looking at. - Jared

3 6

Netnod (SE) has joined RIPE Atlas anchors
by Michela Galante 19 Mar '14

19 Mar '14

Dear RIPE Atlas users, We're happy to announce that another RIPE Atlas anchor has joined the network and is now available as a target for probe hosts conducting their own user-defined measurements. The new anchor is called se-sto-as8674 and it is hosted by Netnod in Stockholm, Sweden on behalf of RIPE NCC since they are one of our RIS Remote Route Collector locations. Anchoring measurements (ping, ping6, traceroute and traceroute6) are scheduled towards this anchor from all the other anchors as well as several hundred probes, providing a continual overview of regional reachability. Results of these measurements are available as raw data in JSON format, and visualised on the map and "seismograph" with many configurable features. You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ Learn more about RIPE Atlas anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/about/anchors/ Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! Kind regards, Measurements Community Building Team RIPE NCC mcb(a)ripe.net

1 0

life-cycle of a probe?
by Wilfried Woeber 19 Mar '14

19 Mar '14

Hi folks, is there a way to find out when a particular probe (under my control[1]) was seen by a/the collector(s) for the first time? The best I have come up with is to look at the raw data download, but I'm not sure that the data has been preserved for raw download in the "early days". Thanks, Wilfried [1] just in case, I am interested in ID 466 and 414

2 2

CSUC (ES) has joined RIPE Atlas anchors
by Michela Galante 17 Mar '14

17 Mar '14

Dear RIPE Atlas users, We're happy to announce that another RIPE Atlas anchor has joined the network and is now available as a target for probe hosts conducting their own user-defined measurements. The new anchor is called es-bcn-as13041 and it is hosted by Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC) in Barcelona, Spain. Congratulations to CSUC! This is the first anchor in Spain. Anchoring measurements (ping, ping6, traceroute and traceroute6) are scheduled towards this anchor from all the other anchors as well as several hundred probes, providing a continual overview of regional reachability. Results of these measurements are available as raw data in JSON format, and visualised on the map and "seismograph" with many configurable features. You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ Learn more about RIPE Atlas anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/about/anchors/ Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! Kind regards, Measurements Community Building Team RIPE NCC mcb(a)ripe.net

1 0

Feature Request - Atlas Latest
by John Bond 17 Mar '14

17 Mar '14

Hello Atlas, I would like to request an additional API call which just returns the latest results for a specific measurement. For use cases I would point you to the "RIPE Atlas - Map Visualisations²[1]. I have also seen places in the dnsmon beta where you only show the latest results. this would also be very useful for trouble shooting, if I see an issue its inconvenient to download xMB of json data just to see the whats going on now. An additional feature would be to ask for a result for X seconds in the past, the call would return a result closest to that time. This is for investigating historic events, if I have an issue that lasts one hour I would normally only need one result to perform the initial investigation. This would also be useful to have a history/timeline function to the maps[1]. The following code at the end of this mail does something similar to what I would like using the current API. By setting GO_BACK_IN_TIME=0 you should get the most recent measurement. However this is not perfect, depending on what value one sets the INTERVAL do you may get multiple results or now may get none and as far as I can tell this dose not relate to the measurement Interval. The other issue with queuing the results like this is that you get a lot of superfluous data. I.e. For the dns measurement in the script below you get result[answers][RDATA] and result-rdata which both seem to have the same data. Furthermore when in a script im not to interested in the probe and measurement details. If I am, I will request that information from the appropriate probe or measurement api call. For the DNS measurement a structure like the following would suite my needs { probe_id: { abuf: str, timestamp: int, result: { additional: str, question: str, authority: str, opcode: str, answer: str, flags: str, rcode: str, id: int }, response_time: float } } Thanks John #/bin/sh GO_BACK_IN_TIME=86400 INTERVAL=240 NOW=$(date +%s) MSG_ID=1423370 URL="https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/measurement/${MSG_ID}/result/?stop=$((NO W - GO_BACK_IN_TIME))&start=$((NOW - GO_BACK_IN_TIME - FREQUENCY))&format=json" echo ${URL} wget -q "${URL}" -O - [1]https://atlas.ripe.net/results/maps/

2 2

Building a "My Measurement" list via the API
by Martin Topholm 17 Mar '14

17 Mar '14

I recently started using the Atlas API interface for easier measurement access. I can't seem to find a way to list "My merasurements". It is quite possible I've overlooked something in the docs, but it seems to me I only can differentiate on is_public=0. Thus all my measurements need to be private in order build a "My Measurements" list. Is there another way? -- Kind regards, Martin Topholm

2 1

Research papers for IMC or other measurements conferences
by Vesna Manojlovic 15 Mar '14

15 Mar '14

Dear colleagues, a couple of researchers using RIPE Atlas brought this conference to my attention, and I noticed that the CFP deadline is approaching fast. I would be curious to hear if anyone else is planning to submit a paper based on RIPE Atlas data to IMC, or any other conference. Please let me know if you need some extra help from us: more credits, higher limits for usage of probes per measurements, or additional text for your paper. We would be grateful for your mention of the RIPE NCC and RIPE Atlas in your paper, and would like to invite you to share your results, after the conference, with RIPE community, either by presenting at RIPE meetings or publishing on RIPE Labs. Regards, Vesna IMC Details: http://conferences2.sigcomm.org/imc/2014/ The 2014 Internet Measurement Conference (IMC) is a three-day event focusing on Internet measurement and analysis. The conference is sponsored jointly by ACM SIGCOMM and ACM SIGMETRICS. IMC 2014 is the 14th in a series of highly successful Internet Measurement Workshops and Conferences. The ACM IMC 2014 conference will be held in Vancouver, BC, Canada on November 5-7, 2014. Call for papers deadline: 30 April http://conferences2.sigcomm.org/imc/2014/cfp.html

2 1

Seismograph for public ongoing measurement
by Sebastian Castro 14 Mar '14

14 Mar '14

Hi! The seismograph is available for UDMs as announced here https://labs.ripe.net/Members/becha/seismograph-and-other-new-ripe-atlas-fe… Is there a way to generate the seismograph for a public ongoing measurement, for example, MSM id 1423322 (f-root)? Cheers -- Sebastian Castro Technical Research Manager .nz Registry Services (New Zealand Domain Name Registry Limited) desk: +64 4 495 2337 mobile: +64 21 400535

2 1

Encouraging RIPE Atlas users to choose for public probes and measurements
by Vesna Manojlovic 13 Mar '14

13 Mar '14

Dear colleagues, One of the main goals of RIPE Atlas is to share information about Internet performance, which we collect via the active measurements performed by the thousands of probes in the RIPE Atlas network. In order to better achieve that goal, last year we suggested making even more of the collected data public. You can read the full details of this proposal on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/becha/proposing-making-ripe-atlas-data-more-p… We asked for feedback about this proposal from the RIPE Atlas community and, based on that feedback, we have decided not to go ahead with the proposal or make any major changes to the system. We would therefore like to revise our original proposal and suggest the following, revised plan: 1. We will strongly encourage RIPE Atlas users to keep their RIPE Atlas probes public and to perform public measurements as much as possible by: - Making new probes public by default (opt-out available) whenever someone applies for a new probe - Checking the public option by default when using the web interface to create user-defined measurements - Rewarding those who make their probes and measurements public by giving them more credits than those who don’t - Requiring all research enabled by special credits to produce public measurement results - Stressing the public nature of RIPE Atlas as a measurements platform in the RIPE NCC's publications and outreach 2. We will continue to allow users to *not* mark their probes public and to schedule user-defined measurements that are not public. 3. We will improve the documentation in order to clarify exactly what information is available for probes and user-defined measurements that are marked public versus those not marked public. Because this revised plan does not involve making any significant changes to our procedures or interfaces, the implementation would take place during our regular deployment cycle. We are basing this revised plan on the reactions of the 13 RIPE Atlas users who provided feedback after we proposed our original plan (you can find more details about the feedback we received below). We would like to hear from more of you, even if you just confirm that you agree with this revised proposal. Regards, Vesna Manojlovic Senior Community Builder for Measurements Tools RIPE NCC Summary of the feedback (the original comments can also be found on the RIPE Atlas mailing list archives): Eleven people replied on the mailing list and two replied on RIPE Labs, with some people supporting more than one option. - Three people supported making the data more public - Six people supported keeping things the same (i.e. against removing the "not public" option) - One person suggested making the data less public - Three people suggested delaying the publication of the public results (a new suggestion) - One person was completely neutral Specific comments included: - Making the data public by default is okay, but leave the option to not make it public - If a delay in making the data public is introduced, one-off measurements should be excluded - A delay in making the data public will introduce more complexity to the system - A proposal to receive extra/fewer credits for making probes and measurements public/not public, respectively

8 8

New on RIPE Labs: Improved RIPE Atlas Probe Pages
by Mirjam Kuehne 13 Mar '14

13 Mar '14

Dear colleagues, We've made it easier to get an overview of the history and measurements for all the public probes in the RIPE Atlas network. Read about that and other new functionality on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/ripe-atlas-improved-pro… Kind regards, Mirjam Kuehne RIPE NCC

5 4