- ripe-atlas - mailman.ripe.net

Recent TLS supported by probes?
by Stephane Bortzmeyer 13 Nov '17

13 Nov '17

I cannot get the certificate for <https://dns-resolver.yeti.eu.org/> (measurement #10174881): "alert" is "{u'description': 40, u'level': 2}". It works with other, more "mainstream", HTTPS sites (see #10174883). I suspect this is because the probes don't handle the recent TLS stuff. Can anyone confirm or infirm?

2 1

Atlas Measurements
by Tom Glass 13 Nov '17

13 Nov '17

Hello all, Hope you are having a great weekend. I just stopped by to ask if you guys would know where/if I can add new probes to an existing measurement. A new probe has appeared in the area we are monitoring and I was hoping there was a way of adding it without recreating the measurement? Cheers, all, Tom

2 1

Odd queries from probe
by Jared Mauch 10 Nov '17

10 Nov '17

While doing some debugging of my home network, I noticed some odd queries from the probe, namely this one: 02:28:36.921622 IP6 fe80::a2f3:c1ff:fec4:479f.51123 > 2001:558:feed::2.53: 23808+ A? 12920.atlas.ripe.net.b61065696c194ac3. (55) Is this some captive portal/wildcarding detection, or perhaps some other software issue? curious, - Jared

2 1

IPv4 leading zeroes and weird interface behaviour
by Max Grobecker 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

Hello, is there - by standard - a definition on how to represent an IPv4 address? I have (for example) the IP address "73.0.255.229", which can IMHO also be written as "073.000.255.229" as the leading zeroes are not giving any changes to the binary representation of this address. Am I right on this? But: When I lookup this IP address on https://stat.ripe.net/073.000.255.229 the first octet is internally getting swapped to "59". This can be explained, if you take "073" as an octal value and convert it to a decimal value. It is definitely a octal-to-decimal conversion thing, as for example also the value "010" is getting replaced by "8" and so on. Now I'm puzzled: Of course, writing IPv4 octets with leading zeroes is not very common. But: Is it officially prohibited or discouraged? This weird conversion also happens inside the "geoiplookup" tool by MaxMind and I'm not sure if I'm going to be the moron in this story or if I found the same bug inside multiple softwares at once ;-) Thanks and greetings from Wuppertal Max

8 7

Segmentation fault (core dumped)
by Antonio D 26 Oct '17

26 Oct '17

I upgraded UBUNTU from 17.04 to 17.10 and I discovered that ripe-atlas-tools had disappeared. So I tried reinstalling it with "pop install ripe-atlas-tools", but the process crashed with the following error: Segmentation fault (core dumped) Can you help me solve the problem? Thank you Antonio Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum

2 1

Why did I get "Over the limit on number of results"?
by Eduardo Duarte 25 Oct '17

25 Oct '17

Hello, I schedule some measurements to run during today but I got an error on some of them. The error is "Over the limit on number of results". I have enough credits to run all the measures so I don't understand this message. Thank you and best regards, -- Eduardo Duarte Gestão e Desenvolvimento de Projetos l Project Development Management *DNS.PT* Rua Latino Coelho, n.º 13, 5.º piso | 1050-132 Lisboa | Portugal Tel: (+351) 211 308 200 Fax: (+351) 211 312 720 dns.pt <http://www.dns.pt> | dnssec.pt <http://www.dnssec.pt> | 3em1.pt <https://www.3em1.pt> | facebook.com/dns.pt <https://www.facebook.com/dns.pt> | pt.linkedin.com/in/dnspt <http://pt.linkedin.com/in/dnspt> Aviso de Confidencialidade/Disclaimer: Este e-mail foi escrito de acordo com o novo acordo ortográfico. Esta mensagem é exclusivamente destinada ao seu destinatário, podendo conter informação CONFIDENCIAL, cuja divulgação está expressamente vedada nos termos da lei. Caso tenha recepcionado indevidamente esta mensagem, solicitamos-lhe que nos comunique esse mesmo facto por esta via devendo apagar o seu conteúdo de imediato. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. It may contain CONFIDENTIAL information protected by law. If this message has been received by error, please notify us via e-mail and delete it immediately. [ Antes de imprimir esta mensagem pense no ambiente. Before printing this message, think about environment ]

3 2

New on RIPE Labs: RIPE Atlas Probes as IoT Devices
by Mirjam Kuehne 20 Oct '17

20 Oct '17

Dear colleagues, As a follow-up to the presentation Robert Kisteleki gave during the IoT Roundtable Meeting in September [1], we have published a RIPE Labs article describing RIPE Atlas probes as IoT devices and some initial design decisions that we thought were important for such an infrastructure: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/kistel/ripe-atlas-probes-as-iot-devices Kind regards, Mirjam Kuhne RIPE NCC [1] https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/roundtable/september-2017/ripe-io…

1 0

status is confusing
by Dave 18 Oct '17

18 Oct '17

Hi, The status page of one of my probes says: I’ve been bitten a few times by misinterpreting this. Could these 2 things be put on separate lines? This does suggest the probe is up but only when you missed the red colour and didn’t get the meaning of the icon. Also, when you read the mail it may be hours later than when it was sent. So keep in mind that a receiver’s probe could be back online in the meantime. Often a mail will be checked on the mobile. The status on a small screen must be clear too. I’ll restart the probe and modem and it will work again but I would have done that on day 1 if the message was more clear. Thanks, Dave

1 0

New on RIPE Labs: Insights from RIPE Atlas Probe Disconnections
by Mirjam Kuehne 17 Oct '17

17 Oct '17

Dear colleagues, There are all kinds of reasons why RIPE Atlas probes might become disconnected. So, even though we'd like all probes to be connected all the time, disconnects can also tell us a useful story. Please find this new article by Emile Aben on RIPE Labs exploring what insights we can gain from RIPE Atlas probe disconnections: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/insights-from-ripe-atlas-probe-disc… Kind regards, Mirjam Kuhne RIPE NCC

1 0

What is the meaning of 127.0.0.1 as probe resolver?
by Baptiste Jonglez 16 Oct '17

16 Oct '17

Hi, While looking at the result of built-in DNS measurements that use the probe resolvers, I noticed that a significant fraction of probes have "127.0.0.1" as a resolver. And the results are strange: performance is really bad, for instance measurement 30002 gives a median resolution time of 300 ms for these probes! What could be the meaning of this? It almost looks like a recursive resolver with no cache at all is running on the probes themselves. I was looking at this measurement: https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/30002/ And here are some example probes that exhibit this "127.0.0.1" symptom: 6001, 6087, 6162, 6235, 6308. Any reasonable explanation is welcome! Thanks, Baptiste

2 2