- ripe-atlas - mailman.ripe.net

Feature request - externalize packet loss in ping measurement UI
by Gil Bahat 10 Feb '16

10 Feb '16

Hi, looking at the JSON data, there is a field for the amount of received packets vs the requested, but at the measurement UI it is not reflected. it'd be great if this can be displayed (e.g. 'x% packet loss' as one of the columns). Regards, Gil Bahat, Director of Online Operations, Magisto Ltd.

2 1

List of my measurements via API
by Luke Overend 09 Feb '16

09 Feb '16

Hi all, I have searched the docs and tried everything I can think of but I cannot get a list of my measurements via the API. Can anyone provide me details on how to do this? If it is not currently possible how do I go about requesting the feature? Thanks Luke Overend -------------------------------------- CloudFlare - AS13335 Network Engineer luke(a)cloudflare.com +442038136383 +447795328022 http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=13335

2 1

Revamped RIPE Atlas website launched today
by Robert Kisteleki 04 Feb '16

04 Feb '16

Dear all, We’re excited to announce that a revamped RIPE Atlas website launches today, so you can expect to see some changes when you visit atlas.ripe.net. We know that it can take some time to get used to change, but we think the new site is a big improvement over the old one and that you’ll find it quicker and easier to access the information you want. Some of the main features include proper landing pages for each section with quick links to the most relevant information, a restructured menu that includes a few new sections, including “Measurements, Maps and Tools”, “Probes and Anchors” and “Resources”, an improved dashboard overview of all of your probes and measurements under “My Atlas”, and faster data tables that you can now search. You can learn more about the revamped site and the reasons behind the change in this RIPE Labs article: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/the-revamped-ripe-atlas… Take some to look around and let us know what you think. We hope you’ll like what you see. Of course, we’ve done our best to ensure that all links are working properly, but if you happen to spot anything that looks wrong or broken, please let us know at atlas(a)ripe.net. Regards, Robert

1 0

API (v1) querying probes by ID
by Wenqin SHAO 03 Feb '16

03 Feb '16

Dear list, I have the impression that querying probes by ID returns unexpected results. An example is: https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/probe/?id=1 <https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/probe/?id=1> As a result, I get the entire probe list: "meta": { "total_count": 16973, "use_iso_time": false, "next": "/api/v1/probe/?id=1&limit=100&offset=100", "limit": 100, "offset": 0, "previous": null }, And ID 1 is an valid ID, which corresponds to the first entry of results: "id": 1, "type": "Probe", "is_public": false, "first_connected": "2010-10-29T15:53:03Z", "last_connected": "2016-02-03T10:02:28.407276Z", "is_anchor": false, "address_v4": null, "address_v6": null, "asn_v4": 3265, "asn_v6": 3265, "country_code": "NL", "prefix_v4": "212.238.0.0/16", "prefix_v6": "2001:980::/29", Regards, wenqin

3 4

Probe uptime?
by Max Mühlbronner 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

Hi, i suspect that there is a problem with my atlas probe, sometimes it is just gone / offline for ~10 minutes (more or less) although there is clearly no issue on the network. Other checks and monitoring works fine at the same time and shows about 100% uptime... I am not sure how to investigate, is there any chance to check the uptime of the probe and not just connection time? Maybe the device is hanging or rebooting? Internet Address Controller Connected (UTC) Connected for Disconnected (UTC) Disconnected for xxx.xxx.xxx.xx ctr-nue19, DE 2016-01-06 17:03:27 5d 22h 40m 2016-01-12 15:44:09 0h 5m xxx.xxx.xxx.xx ctr-nue19, DE 2016-01-01 00:29:44 5d 16h 16m 2016-01-06 16:46:33 0h 16m xxx.xxx.xxx.xx ctr-nue19, DE 2015-12-31 23:47:35 0h 38m 2016-01-01 00:25:40 0h 4m xxx.xxx.xxx.xx ctr-nue19, DE 2015-12-31 22:59:18 0h 41m 2015-12-31 23:40:32 0h 7m xxx.xxx.xxx.xx ctr-nue19, DE 2015-12-31 22:35:12 0h 20m 2015-12-31 22:56:08 0h 3m Best Regards Max M.

2 2

API (v1) querying probes--does stats_name field count and possibility of negative selection
by Wenqin SHAO 28 Jan '16

28 Jan '16

Dear list, I encountered some unexpected results when selecting probes with status_name filed. An example is given below: https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/probe/?country_code=BG&tags=system-v3,datacen… <https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/probe/?country_code=BG&tags=system-v3,datacen…> 8 results were returned containing probes that are abandoned, as well disconnected and connected. To nail down the problematic field, I tried following queries: https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/probe/?status_name=Connected https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/probe/?status_name=Abandoned https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/probe/?status_name=Disconnected https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/probe/?status_name=Haha Exactly same number of probes, 16889, are return with each of these quests, which makes me wonder whether the status_name filed is actually taken into consideration? One other issue, is to negatively select probes according to some fields, especially tags filed, for example, probes do not contain home tag. I’d like to know if such selection logic is supported by v1 API? If yes, how to compose the query? If not, would it be considered in v2 API? A bunch of thanks in advance. Regards, Wenqin Telecom ParisTech

1 0

No Ethernet activity on new probe
by Marat Khalili 28 Jan '16

28 Jan '16

Dear All, I have received my probe yesterday morning (V3, like shown on https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/probe-v3/ ), connected and registered it. Unfortunately, not only no measurements or IP address information appeared in my profile after waiting several hours, but there's no Ethernet activity from probe at all, even in the packet trace. Things I tried: * 3 different switches (Fast and Gigabit types); in all cases a notebook running either Windows or Ubuntu when connected into the same socket acquires IP address just fine and can browse the Internet. * 3 different LAN cables; in all cases switches detect 100 Mbps physical wire but nothing more. * 2 different DHCP servers as well as wireshark on direct connection. * 3 different power sources (1A phone charger, notebook 2xUSB, PC USB). * Removing and re-inserting the USB flash key that came with the device, dd'ing its contents to a different USB flash and inserting it instead (dd finished successfully). Every time after the boot sequence ends first light glows steadily and adjacent one blinks slowly, like it is supposed to be according to https://atlas.ripe.net/about/faq/#what-do-the-lights-on-the-side-of-the-pro… . Looks like the interface just isn't up in the device OS. Is there anything else I can check? Should I request another probe? (it took more than month to receive first one by post) -- With Best Regards, Marat Khalili

3 6

500 Probe limit
by Marco Slater 27 Jan '16

27 Jan '16

Hello, I’ve been doing some tests on anycasted networks, and I’ve been hitting an error which doesn’t allow me to assign more then 500 probes to a measurement, is there a way to have this unlocked? I presume it is a default protection to not cause issues to hosts being probed? Thank you. :) - Marco

3 2

HTTP measurements at willing targets / protocol suggestion
by Gil Bahat 27 Jan '16

27 Jan '16

Hi, We are interested (like many others, I guess) in the ability to perform HTTP measurements at our own non-anchored network. Understanding the potential for abuse, I would like to suggest the following authentication protocol, which is based on best practices exhibited by other services with such potential (abuse or privacy implications). 1. Confirm control of the domain registration: * This is usually done by mailing the technical contact for the relevant WHOIS entry with a confirmation email containing a unique hash, thus validating ownership. 2. Confirm control of the DNS servers: * This is usually done by editing the root TXT record with a unique hash or publishing a CNAME with unique hash. 3. Confirm control of the Web servers: * This is usually done by placing a uniquely-hashed file in the webserver root directory, a unique hash in the meta-tags for the index html file or a unique value in a file such as robots.txt. I believe this protocol is sufficient to ensure that a web site owner agrees to the implications of allowing free HTTP measurements against their servers and that no unwilling server will ever be probed. At most during the protocol, the only resource that can be hit is a static file or robots.txt specifically, which has very little capability to overwhelm a web server, especially if negative responses are cached for a considerable amount of time / validation is done via a few nodes and propagated across the network. thoughts/ideas welcome. Regards, Gil Bahat, DevOps Engineer, Magisto Ltd.

3 3

LLDP Support for RIPE Probes
by Annika Wickert 27 Jan '16

27 Jan '16

Hi everybody, I would like to see LLDP support in the future on the RIPE probes. It would be a really helpful feature, to see on what Port the RIPE Probe resides at the moment. Cheers, Annika

9 11

Probe downtime notification
by Micha Bailey 26 Jan '16

26 Jan '16

I got an email 20 minutes ago telling me that my probe (#25346) is down, and apparently it's been down since 2016-01-24 15:11:10 UTC -- almost 24 hours. My settings are such that I should be getting an email within 15 minutes. Does anyone know why it's not emailing me right away? Has this happened to anyone else?

2 1

probe tagged as "Hardware problem suspected"
by sarah.wassermann＠student.ulg.ac.be 25 Jan '16

25 Jan '16

Hi, My probe (probeID: 24102) got tagged as "Hardware problem suspected" 2 weeks ago (and has also been disconnected since 2 weeks) and I am unable to bring it back to life again... (I am not an expert regarding hardware problems, so I will not be able to address the issue; restarting the router and plugging it out/back in didn't help). This probe behaved a bit strangely since the beginning: it disconnected itself for a few minutes per day without any reason, but I didn't pay much attention to that. Unfortunately, I need credits to conduct my research. Is it possible to order a new probe and to send this probe to RIPE? Maybe they can fix the problem and send the probe to someone who is interested in hosting a one? Thanks! Sarah Wassermann

3 6

Possible changes to the V1 REST API
by Chris Amin 22 Jan '16

22 Jan '16

Dear RIPE Atlas users, Over the past few days we have been making some changes behind the scenes in preparation for an upcoming version of the RIPE Atlas REST API. We identified and resolved several problems that these changes caused to the existing version of the API. The problems have now been fixed and you should not notice anything different with the existing API. If you continue to see anything strange, do please let us know. Kind regards, Chris Amin RIPE NCC

1 0

Display issues on the RIPE Atlas measurements listing
by Chris Amin 20 Jan '16

20 Jan '16

Dear RIPE Atlas users, Some of you may be noticing issues displaying measurements on the RIPE Atlas UI if you look at Public measurements or have lots of measurements of your own. We're currently working on this issue and apologise for any inconvenience caused. Kind regards, Chris Amin RIPE NCC

1 1

RIPE Atlas webinar recording and new dates
by Lia Hestina 18 Jan '16

18 Jan '16

Dear colleagues, We are happy to let you know that a recording of the Advance RIPE Atlas Usage webinar is now available on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJMFGuM0kMo <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJMFGuM0kMo> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJMFGuM0kMo <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJMFGuM0kMo>> If you would like to participate in a live webinar, we have two sessions available on the following dates: February 9 2016 March 17 2016 The Advanced RIPE Atlas Usage webinar teaches network operators how to use RIPE Atlas to monitor and troubleshoot their own networks. Learn more about the webinar and the necessary prerequisites: https://www.ripe.net/support/training/learn-online/webinars/advanced-ripe-a… <https://www.ripe.net/support/training/learn-online/webinars/advanced-ripe-a…><https://www.ripe.net/support/training/learn-online/webinars/advanced-ripe-a… <https://www.ripe.net/support/training/learn-online/webinars/advanced-ripe-a…>> RIPE NCC members can register online at: https://lirportal.ripe.net/training/register/courseCode/WEB20150046 <https://lirportal.ripe.net/training/register/courseCode/WEB20150046><https://lirportal.ripe.net/training/register/courseCode/WEB20150046 <https://lirportal.ripe.net/training/register/courseCode/WEB20150046>> Non-members can email training(a)ripe.net <mailto:training@ripe.net> <mailto:training@ripe.net <mailto:training@ripe.net>> and be manually registered. Kind regards, RIPE Atlas Team

1 0

Error on multi-probe measurement creation
by Matt Calder 15 Jan '16

15 Jan '16

Starting on Jan 6th, I started getting this error when creating new measurements. "Your selection of probes contains at least one probe that is unavailable. Error 104." These measurements had been running with no issues for the last year. I tried checking through the API that all probe's status' are Connected and are Public but it doesn't seem to make a difference. I am specifying a list of specific probes to be used which is needed for the specific experiment. Small number of probes like 1, 2, or 3 usually work. Larger numbers like 10 - 75, work occasionally. 300 - 400 probes per measurement never seem to work. Appreciate any help. Matt

1 1

What is 'iwantbcp38compliancetesting' user tag?
by Geert Jan de Groot 13 Jan '16

13 Jan '16

When revisiting the settings of my probe, I found this 'iwantbcp38compliancetesting' user tag. I know what BCP38 is, but what is the meaning of the tag? Is it a poll? Geert Jan

8 11

integrity checks for the Atlas software?
by Wilfried Woeber 12 Jan '16

12 Jan '16

While thinking about options or mechanisms to make virtual probes "tamper-proof" I had this question coming up: Is the probe software capable to "verify" (check-sum or digital sig) the bootstrap kit and then, during run-time, verify that the code in memory is still genuine? Thanks, Wilfried

6 5

Atlas probe offline
by Steve Hill 11 Jan '16

11 Jan '16

My Atlas probe (ID 14587) has been showing as offline since December 16th. I can see DHCP requests/replies, it ARPs for the gateway and I can see DNS requests and pings from the probe, and successful replies to all of this traffic being sent back to the probe. e.g.: 12:13:38.790096 IP 192.168.0.115.35404 > 217.146.115.154.53: 2+ AAAA? ctr-nue15.atlas.ripe.net. (42) 12:13:38.797337 IP 217.146.115.154.53 > 192.168.0.115.35404: 2 1/6/12 AAAA 2a01:4f8:120:14ee::2 (482) 12:13:38.798179 IP 192.168.0.115.57785 > 217.146.115.154.53: 3+ A? ctr-nue15.atlas.ripe.net. (42) 12:13:38.799649 IP 217.146.115.154.53 > 192.168.0.115.57785: 3 1/6/12 A 78.46.87.51 (470) 12:14:58.990977 IP 192.168.0.115.37934 > 217.146.115.154.53: 2+ AAAA? IUSB-READONLY.U36.M6466B3B0EC98.sos.atlas.ripe.net. (68) 12:14:59.060132 IP 217.146.115.154.53 > 192.168.0.115.37934: 2 1/1/2 AAAA 2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1337 (164) 12:14:59.060983 IP 192.168.0.115.57523 > 217.146.115.154.53: 3+ A? IUSB-READONLY.U36.M6466B3B0EC98.sos.atlas.ripe.net. (68) 12:14:59.114915 IP 217.146.115.154.53 > 192.168.0.115.57523: 3 1/1/2 A 193.0.19.55 (152) 12:14:59.115925 IP 192.168.0.115 > 193.0.19.55: ICMP echo request, id 954, seq 0, length 64 12:14:59.142586 IP 193.0.19.55 > 192.168.0.115: ICMP echo reply, id 954, seq 0, length 64 12:15:00.116800 IP 192.168.0.115 > 193.0.19.55: ICMP echo request, id 954, seq 1, length 64 12:15:00.143773 IP 193.0.19.55 > 192.168.0.115: ICMP echo reply, id 954, seq 1, length 64 I can't see any other IPv4 traffic, but I do see IPv6 HTTPS traffic. I'm not sure where to go next with figuring out why the probe seems to have vanished. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks. -- - Steve

6 8

Examination of ARM based Atlas telemetry nodes
by Michael Schloh von Bennewitz 10 Jan '16

10 Jan '16

Hello developers, I'm scheduled to talk at the forthcoming MINIX conference, and was hoping to have the chance to examine your ARM based Atlas telemetry system. I only know of the Raspberry Pi devices loaned to the Tor project, and this could be relevant to my IoT work (leveraging IPv6 and ARM.) Andrew Tanenbaum recommended I write to Philip, is he here? Cheers, Michael -- Michael Schloh von Bennewitz Software Development Engineer Europalab Networks R&D, Munich Office: +49(89)44239885 UTC+2 Mobile: Same as 'Office' VoIP: sips:michael@schloh.com Web: http://michael.schloh.com/

3 2

Availability report accuracy
by Lorenzo Colitti 03 Jan '16

03 Jan '16

Hi, mostly out of curiosity: what sort of accuracy are the numbers in the monthly availability report? For example: the report says that my probe was "connected" 99.95% of the time (down for 20 seconds) in December. What does that mean? That the SSH control connection was not up? That the probe didn't have link? That it couldn't reach any targets? Something else? Cheers, Lorenzo

4 4

Seven new RIPE Atlas anchors have joined the community
by Michela Galante 31 Dec '15

31 Dec '15

Dear RIPE Atlas users, Since the previous announcement, seven new RIPE Atlas anchors have been activated bringing the total number to 164. - nc-nou-as56055, hosted by Micro Logic Systems (MLS) in Nouméa, New Caledonia. - bg-sof-as47872, hosted by Sofia Connect in Sofia, Bulgaria. - bg-sls-as198228, hosted by Silistra Telecom Solutions in Silistra, Bulgaria. - fr-ysd-as201958, hosted by Claranet in Saint-Denis, France. - de-erl-as680, hosted by Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg in Erlangen, Germany. - cr-sjo-as263779, hosted by NIC Costa Rica in San José, Costa Rica and sponsored by LACNIC. - nl-roo-as43350, hosted by NFOrce Entertainment in Roosendaal, Netherlands. The map of all anchor locations is available at: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/map/ You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ And here are the logos and links to hosting companies: https://atlas.ripe.net/get-involved/community/#!tab-anchor-sponsors We are still accepting new applications from organisations interested in hosting a RIPE Atlas anchor. We are particularly interested in deploying anchors in the Middle East, Western Asia, Latin America and Africa, in order to add more geographical diversity to the measurement data. There are more organisations that want to host a RIPE Atlas anchor but don’t have the necessary funding. To learn more about sponsoring an anchor, please contact us at mcb(a)ripe.net To apply for your own RIPE Atlas anchor: https://atlas.ripe.net/get-involved/become-an-anchor-host/ For any other questions, please contact us at atlas(a)ripe.net We’d like to thank all the anchor hosts and the organisations sponsoring anchors for their support in 2015. Thanks to you it was possible to expand the coverage and reach this amazing goal. Wishing all of you the best for 2016. Michela Galante on behalf of the RIPE Atlas Team RIPE NCC

1 0

How to deal with inaccurate geocoding of probes
by Klaus Darilion 30 Dec '15

30 Dec '15

Hi! Inspired by https://perso.telecom-paristech.fr/~drossi/index.php?n=Dataset.Anycast I wanted to detect my Anycast locations using the Atlas probes. The problem is, that my results are only as accurate as the geocoding of the Atlas probes. For example probe #19273 is reported to be somewhere in Kansas. Bit the probe is only 5ms away from my LAX server and also traceroute indicates the probe is in LAX (traceroute to 63.84.150.1). So, now I am seeking some advice how to handle such problems. Is there some tag that indicates "verified location"? Any other ideas? Thanks Klaus

2 1

Ticket response times
by Micha Bailey 30 Dec '15

30 Dec '15

Hi, what's the average time for responses to atlas(a)ripe.net tickets? I've been waiting almost 2 months to hear back on 1193254, and was wondering if that's a typical wait time or if it fell between the cracks...

3 2

Anchor probes with broken lat/lon
by Klaus Darilion 29 Dec '15

29 Dec '15

https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/probe/6155/ "latitude": 2228.7695, "longitude": -4412.6105, https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/probe/6166/ "latitude": 2840.3705, "longitude": 631.8105, regards Klaus

2 1