- ripe-atlas - mailman.ripe.net

Architecture and firmware version filter in probe selection
by Yang Yu 13 Nov '15

13 Nov '15

It would be nice to be able to set architecture and firmware version criteria when selecting probes, making the results more consistent and avoid unnecessary measurements in certain cases. Yang

2 1

Feature request for Traceroute in RIPE Atlas
by Yue LI 13 Nov '15

13 Nov '15

Dear all, So far, the Atlas traceroute is such that if there are 5 consecutive hops with only timeouts (denoted by a star "*"), traceroute will directly try hop 255 and then stop the measurement, which means that the number of total hops can not be obtained. An example can be found: https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/2841001/#!probes (the probe #22341) Unfortunately, the number of hops is so important to be used as a metric to evaluate the performance of a new protocol. Thus, I propose to add a configuration option for the number of hops after which traceroute decides to call it quits. I wonder whether there are somebody else are also interested in this new feature please? Best regards, Yue -- Yue LI PhD student, Telecom ParisTech Tel: +33 (0)661091840 E-mail: yueli.cnfr(a)gmail.com

1 0

New on RIPE Labs: RIPE Atlas WiFi Measurements
by Robert Kisteleki 13 Nov '15

13 Nov '15

Dear colleagues, We're thinking about implementing WiFi measurements in RIPE Atlas, and we want to know what you think. There are several different ways we could do this - find out more on RIPE Labs and then take our poll to make your voice heard! https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/ripe-atlas-wifi-measure… Kind regards, Mirjam Kuehne & Robert Kisteleki RIPE NCC

2 1

edst 193.0.0.228 in traceroute results
by Yang Yu 13 Nov '15

13 Nov '15

Hello, In https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/2928258, I did a UDP traceroute. "edst":"193.0.0.228" from first hop and second hop somehow showed up in the results after the last hop that responded to traceroute, which should have been a reply to buil-in measurement to tt01.ripe.net. And under maps tab the result is presented with the first 2 hops showing up after several non-responding hops. Is this a bug? I actually see it happening quite often in atlas traceroute results with firmware > 4680. Another example is https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/2928262 >>> https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/bugs/ 2015-03-04 Before firmware 4680, traceroute could experience interference from other measurements. In general, periodic traceroutes did not interfere with other periodic traceroutes, but could experience interference from one-off traceroutes. Typically, this interference will show up in the 'edst' field. This problem was fixed in 4680. Thanks. Yang

1 0

Feature request for IP record route feature in RIPE Atlas
by Pavel Odintsov 11 Nov '15

11 Nov '15

Hello, dear Atlas Team! As host of RIPE Anchor #6111 I have some feedback about your awesome service! Thanks for your Great Job in measuring Internet! I would like to ask very important feature for measuring reverse trace route. I'm speaking about IP record route option which could track up to 9 hops of reverse path. I want to know path to my hosts from networks who haven't RIPE Atlas. Actually I could not implement this feature due to 9 hop restriction in IP header. But RIPE Atlas offer really huge coverage over the World and we could reach really any host with <7 hops. But we haven't this feature in RIPE Atlas. Finally with this feature we could build full adjacently map over all the World. I have checked implementation details here https://labs.ripe.net/Members/philip_homburg/ripe-atlas-measurements-source… Looks like we need to build separate libevent based toolkit for this task or add this feature to ping tool. But unfortunately I could not find any docs about deploy of RIPE source code for development. Could you share some information? -- Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov

14 34

RIPE Atlas anchor self assembly
by Michela Galante 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

Hi everyone, Some people on this list have been asking about the possibility of purchasing hardware for a RIPE Atlas anchor by themselves and assembling it. This is indeed possible. However we do not recommend it because if the assembled hardware is not exactly to our specifications, we will not be able to use it as an anchor. If you still wish to assemble an anchor by yourself, you can find step by step instructions here: https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/anchor-installation/ Please, note that you do need more than the Soekris box. The anchor consists of: • Soekris Net6501-70 board • 1U 19-inch rack-mounted case • Intel SSD 525 or 530 series 240GB mSATA SSD More requirements are listed here: https://atlas.ripe.net/get-involved/become-an-anchor-host/ If you have more questions about anchors, please email to atlas(a)ripe.net and we will be very happy to help you. Best regards, Michela Galante Measurements Community Building RIPE NCC

5 4

Sharing credits with colleagues
by Oliver Haake 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

Hey there, I'm very curious if you guys have an ETA for the "Sharing credits with colleagues" feature. Any ideas? Cheers, Oliver

3 4

Read on RIPE Labs about the newest features & the community efforts
by Vesna Manojlovic 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

Dear colleagues, There are a number of interesting new features and enhancements for RIPE Atlas users. Learn how you can put them to use: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/kistel/ripe-atlas-update-http-measurements-cl… Regards, Vesna

3 2

ntp built-in measurements?
by Bajpai, Vaibhav 04 Nov '15

04 Nov '15

Dear RIPE Atlas, Do the probes not run (new) NTP measurements as built-in measurements? — I was glancing over the measurement data pushed by my probe, but I do not see any NTP measurement data. Although, when I try to provision a UDM, I do get an option to schedule an NTP measurement. Thanks! Best, Vaibhav ===================================================== Vaibhav Bajpai Room 91, Research I School of Engineering and Sciences Jacobs University Bremen, Germany www.vaibhavbajpai.com =====================================================

3 4

Question about the hardware
by Micha Bailey 30 Oct '15

30 Oct '15

I just got my Probe, and I was wondering what the thought/planning process was when they were designed. Why use a $40 wireless router/access point? I would have thought that cheaper options would be available that provide the requirements (processor and a network port).

3 3