April 2016 - ripe-atlas - mailman.ripe.net

Scheduling a test for all probes?
by Jared Mauch 06 Apr '16

06 Apr '16

Is there a way to schedule a one-off test on all the probes to be run “at a leisurely pace”, eg: looking up a specific DNS QNAME? (I’ll call it a lazy query/scheduling). - Jared

3 2

Research using RIPE Atlas probes: How Pingable are the Pingables?
by Vesna Manojlovic 05 Apr '16

05 Apr '16

Dear colleagues, take a look at how the "pingable:" and "ping-hdl:" attributes have been adopted in the last five years and how reachable the pingable addresses registered in the RIPE Database are when pinged from RIPE Atlas. Spoiler alert: It could be better. Please find the details on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/wilhelm/how-pingable-are-the-pingables Kind regards, Vesna

1 0

Credits sharing and other new features
by Vesna Manojlovic 04 Apr '16

04 Apr '16

Dear colleagues, many of you have been asking for the credits sharing options, and now we have added two new ways that you can go about it: - standing orders - share access - and the transfers are still possible too All about credits: https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/credits/ In addition to that, in the past few months, we've added some other new features and functionality to RIPE Atlas, including making the DNSMON code available on GitHub for personal use, displaying IPv4 vs IPv6 comparisons in LatencyMON, and new limits on probes per measurement and results per day. Learn more about the latest updates on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/ripe-altas-update-dnsmo… Regards, Vesna

2 1

Re: [atlas] [ripe.net #1204062] request to add three more ccTLDs to, DNSMON: CR, SG, and TW
by Romeo Zwart 04 Apr '16

04 Apr '16

Hi Peter, You have recently requested to have three ccTLD zones be added to DNSMON. Unfortunately, since the zones do not fall into the RIPE service region and the zone owners are not members of the RIPE NCC, the request does not qualify according to ripe-661. If the zone owners do wish their zones to be monitored by DNSMON we need to ask them to become members of the RIPE NCC. Alternatively they could argument an exception for their case with the DNS working group. Apologies for the confusion. Feel free to contact us if you have further questions. Kind regards, Romeo -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [ripe.net #1204062] request to add three more ccTLDs to DNSMON: CR, SG, and TW Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 10:39:21 +0200 From: pk(a)denic.de <atlas(a)ripe.net> Reply-To: atlas(a)ripe.net CC: becha(a)ripe.net, mgalante(a)ripe.net Hi Alastair, On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:40:48AM +0200, Alastair Strachan wrote: > Could you please provide me with the points of contact who gave you their consent for an independent verification? sure, we'll dig it out of our ticketing system. Regards, Peter

1 0

probe tagged as "system: Firewall problem suspected"
by sarah.wassermann＠student.ulg.ac.be 02 Apr '16

02 Apr '16

Hi, I have (once again) problems with my probe (probeID: 24102). This time, it got tagged as "system: Firewall problem suspected". The strange thing is that I did not touch anything on my router when this happened and did not change any other configuration... This probe is located in Luxembourg. I now brought it to Belgium and plugged it into the router I have here. Nothing changed. Furthermore, here in Belgium, its 3rd light is slowly blinking, which let's suppose that it gets tuck in the network-testing phase. Anybody knows how to fix this? (I already had some problems with that probe ("system: Hardware problem suspected") but I could solve them thanks to a hint given by a user.) My worst problem is that, due to this issue, we have difficulties earning enough credits for our research... So I would be really happy if this problem could be solved easily :( Thanks! Sarah

4 8

Implementing structured error reports ("Problem Details for HTTP APIs")?
by Stephane Bortzmeyer 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Hello, IETF approved the future RFC draft-ietf-appsawg-http-problem "Problem Details for HTTP APIs" which standardize structured error reports (in JSON) to add machine-readable information to HTTP error codes. Would it be a good idea to convert current Atlas reports ({"error":{"status":400,"code":104,"detail":"__all__: Your selected prefix is not covered by our network.","title":"Bad Request"}}) to the new and standard format?

3 4