reverseDNS problem alerts - to be discussed in "Services" or "DNS" WG
Dear all, I am following up internally on a couple of (minor) issues related to reverse DNS configuration mechanisms. Amongst others I am looking for clarification regarding: - misleading(?) text in alert messsages, related to IPv6 - selection of master server to transfer zones from - loose ends in config automation for legacy address space What is the appropriate list or WG to raise these issues - the NCC-Services WG or the DNS WG? Thanks, Wilfried PS: I could certainly take this up privately with the NCC's staff, but I guess some of these aspects might be of interest to the community, too.
On 18/11/08 09:45, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: Dear Wilfried,
I am following up internally on a couple of (minor) issues related to reverse DNS configuration mechanisms.
Amongst others I am looking for clarification regarding:
- misleading(?) text in alert messsages, related to IPv6 - selection of master server to transfer zones from - loose ends in config automation for legacy address space
What is the appropriate list or WG to raise these issues - the NCC-Services WG or the DNS WG?
These issues sound like they're all related to DNS services, so the DNS WG is probably the best place to start a discussion. If you have any specific questions about your zones or reverse delegations, please feel free to send a message to <dns-help@ripe.net> and we'll be happy to answer your questions. Regards, -- Anand Buddhdev DNS Services Manager, RIPE NCC
participants (2)
-
Anand Buddhdev -
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet