All, in London we discussed the chair selection process without much feedback. I promised to write up the slides I had made in text and send to list and we would then follow that process. The process outlined in London was as follows : RIPE NCC-Services WG Chair Selection process The RIPE NCC Services WG shall have at least two Working Group chairs and a maximum of three. The RIPE NCC Services WG Chairs are selected for a two year period, and one of the chairs will stand down every year. The chair not standing down shall make a call for interested parties on the RIPE NCC Services WG mailing list. Interested parties then have a two week period to make their interest known. After this, the chair(s) not up for selection will issue a two week discussion period where the RIPE NCC Services WG community can express approval or otherwise for the candidates that have expressed interest. At the end of the two week discussion period the chair(s) not up for selection will call consensus for the candidate(s). Appeals will follow the normal WG chair appeal process from the RIPE PDP. The little feedback we got on the mailing list and and the meeting I believe is consensus., but I’d like to with this email start a two week last call on the proposed process. We will have a brief a discussion in Amsterdam, and then per the above start the call for nominees as per above. -- Best regards, Lindqvist Kurt Erik kurtis@kurtis.pp.se
On Tue, 05 May 2015 14:54:53 +0100, Lindqvist Kurt Erik wrote:
The RIPE NCC Services WG shall have at least two Working Group chairs and a maximum of three. The RIPE NCC Services WG Chairs are selected for a two year period, and one of the chairs will stand down every year. The chair not standing down shall make a call for interested parties on the RIPE NCC Services WG mailing list. Interested parties then have a two week period to make their interest known. After this, the chair(s) not up for selection will issue a two week discussion period where the RIPE NCC Services WG community can express approval or otherwise for the candidates that have expressed interest. At the end of the two week discussion period the chair(s) not up for selection will call consensus for the candidate(s). Appeals will follow the normal WG chair appeal process from the RIPE PDP.
Kurtis, I'm confused. I hope you can clarify something for me. In case there are 3 chairs, will the term of office still be 2 years? If so, it seems to follow that one and respectively two chairs will have to step down in alternate years. Is this the intent, or have I misunderstood or overlooked something? ATB Niall
On 5 May 2015, at 19:42, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On Tue, 05 May 2015 14:54:53 +0100, Lindqvist Kurt Erik wrote:
The RIPE NCC Services WG shall have at least two Working Group chairs and a maximum of three. The RIPE NCC Services WG Chairs are selected for a two year period, and one of the chairs will stand down every year. The chair not standing down shall make a call for interested parties on the RIPE NCC Services WG mailing list. Interested parties then have a two week period to make their interest known. After this, the chair(s) not up for selection will issue a two week discussion period where the RIPE NCC Services WG community can express approval or otherwise for the candidates that have expressed interest. At the end of the two week discussion period the chair(s) not up for selection will call consensus for the candidate(s). Appeals will follow the normal WG chair appeal process from the RIPE PDP.
Kurtis, I'm confused. I hope you can clarify something for me.
In case there are 3 chairs, will the term of office still be 2 years?
Yes.
If so, it seems to follow that one and respectively two chairs will have to step down in alternate years. Is this the intent, or have I misunderstood or overlooked something?
Nope, that is exactly it! -- Best regards, Lindqvist Kurt Erik kurtis@kurtis.pp.se
All, following the below announcement and that the comment period ended today, we will continue with the process as per below and I will ask the RIPE NCC to publish the process below on the NCC Services WG page. - kurtis - On 5 May 2015, at 15:54, Lindqvist Kurt Erik wrote:
All,
in London we discussed the chair selection process without much feedback. I promised to write up the slides I had made in text and send to list and we would then follow that process. The process outlined in London was as follows :
RIPE NCC-Services WG Chair Selection process
The RIPE NCC Services WG shall have at least two Working Group chairs and a maximum of three. The RIPE NCC Services WG Chairs are selected for a two year period, and one of the chairs will stand down every year. The chair not standing down shall make a call for interested parties on the RIPE NCC Services WG mailing list. Interested parties then have a two week period to make their interest known. After this, the chair(s) not up for selection will issue a two week discussion period where the RIPE NCC Services WG community can express approval or otherwise for the candidates that have expressed interest. At the end of the two week discussion period the chair(s) not up for selection will call consensus for the candidate(s). Appeals will follow the normal WG chair appeal process from the RIPE PDP.
The little feedback we got on the mailing list and and the meeting I believe is consensus., but I’d like to with this email start a two week last call on the proposed process. We will have a brief a discussion in Amsterdam, and then per the above start the call for nominees as per above.
-- Best regards,
Lindqvist Kurt Erik kurtis@kurtis.pp.se
-- Best regards, Lindqvist Kurt Erik kurtis@kurtis.pp.se
participants (2)
-
Lindqvist Kurt Erik -
Niall O'Reilly