2023-03 Review Phase (Voluntary Transfer Lock)

Dear colleagues, Policy proposal 2023-03, “Voluntary Transfer Lock”, is now in the Review Phase. The goal of this proposal is to allow resource holders whose resources are registered with the RIPE NCC to inform them which of these resources must not be transferred for a certain amount of time. The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this proposal to support the community’s discussion. You can find the proposal and impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-03 https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-03#impact-analysis And the draft documents at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-03/draft As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four-week Review Phase is to continue discussion of the proposal taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document. At the end of the Review Phase, the Working Group (WG) Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase. We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and to send any comments to ncc-services-wg@ripe.net before 31 August 2023. Kind regards, Angela Dall'Ara Policy Officer RIPE NCC

Hello working group!
Policy proposal 2023-03, “Voluntary Transfer Lock”, is now in the Review Phase.
In the previous phase we discussed the idea behind this proposal and a first draft policy text. Based on the feedback we got back then we created the current version. The RIPE NCC did an impact analysis based on that. And now we need you again! Please let us know if the current policy proposal text and its consequences as described in the impact analysis still match your wants/needs/expectations! In the review phase we need people to confirm that they like what they see. After we conclude this phase I promise I’ll stop nagging ;) The next phase would be the last-call phase (speak now, or forever hold your peace) and no input from the working group is needed at that point unless someone spots a problem somewhere. But we are still in the review phase, and that is very much still “no progress without working group participation” territory. So those who would like this proposal to move forward: please speak up! Cheers, On behalf of the proposers Sander

On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 07:54, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote: [...]
Please let us know if the current policy proposal text and its consequences as described in the impact analysis still match your wants/needs/expectations! In the review phase we need people to confirm that they like what they see.
It's fine. Thanks, Leo
participants (3)
-
Angela Dall'Ara
-
Leo Vegoda
-
Sander Steffann