Re: [ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?
I understand that some of us are vary passionate about the RIPE "new comers" and always are trying to help them in any possible way. But I cannot see any reason why NCC members should pay for a ripe archivist at this stage as the demand for digging old discussions is not really high, and the outcome of having an archivist somehow is very limited. (cost/benefit?) Some volunteers can get involved for now and if later we could see a higher demand or need more resources, we can always ask NCC for a RIPE archivist. Regards, Arash
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:32:23PM +0430, Arash Naderpour wrote:
-1,
It doesn't make sense to me at this stage.
Why, exactly? In Address-Policy, for example, many of the current policies go back to discussions we had years and years ago. So having more easily accessible archives of "old discussions" would help newcomers to understand better why things evolved the way they did...
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
I understand that some of us are vary passionate about the RIPE "new comers" and always are trying to help them in any possible way.
it's for those of us old-timers whose memories are decaying rapidly. randy
In that case, I'm sure there would be always some volunteers in our community that would be happy to help others to refresh their memories :) I think as far as we have more important issues that affect a bigger group of NCC members (and our community), a RIPE archivist is something fancy. Best Regards, Arash
it's for those of us old-timers whose memories are decaying rapidly.
randy
participants (2)
-
Arash Naderpour -
Randy Bush