Judging by the RIPE statistics posted in regards to hostmaster response time everything is great: http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/rs/rt-hostmaster.html For the last 2 weeks response time is less than 1 day. Well due to the "2007-01 Phase 2 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC", I have been submitting tickets to move ASNs assigned to my LIR over a decade ago to other LIRs which are now the owner of that ASN (yet now is billed to my LIR). So starting on June 16 - 6 days ago I submitted 6 "move requests" and even got back ticket acknowledgments: 2009063188, 2009063190, etc. and yesterday a 7th request. Yet, I have not heard back from RIPE NCC. Yet, the stats graphs shows all ticket requests answered within 1 day. Is it just me?! -Hank
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi Hank, yes, the response time listed in the graph are not "accurate". Regarding the "moves" from LIR to LIR I got the following reply on my own request: - --- We did not forget about your request. We are currently drafting a procedure document for this process which will become publicly available soon. As soon as the procedure has been published we will move the resources in question from de.xxxxx over to de.connectingbytes as requested. - --- So I guess it will just take some time. That it didn't come into the RIPE's mind, that *some* LIR's will have to move some PI / ASN is "strange" ;) Cheers, Patrick Am 22.06.2009 06:45, schrieb Hank Nussbacher:
Judging by the RIPE statistics posted in regards to hostmaster response time everything is great: http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/rs/rt-hostmaster.html
For the last 2 weeks response time is less than 1 day.
Well due to the "2007-01 Phase 2 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC", I have been submitting tickets to move ASNs assigned to my LIR over a decade ago to other LIRs which are now the owner of that ASN (yet now is billed to my LIR).
So starting on June 16 - 6 days ago I submitted 6 "move requests" and even got back ticket acknowledgments: 2009063188, 2009063190, etc. and yesterday a 7th request. Yet, I have not heard back from RIPE NCC.
Yet, the stats graphs shows all ticket requests answered within 1 day.
Is it just me?!
-Hank
- -- ConnectingBytes GmbH - "www.kambach.net" | In der Steele 35, 40599 Düsseldorf, Germany | Telefon: 0800 / 900 2580 - 1, Fax: 0800 / 900 2580 - 2 | Email: pkambach@kambach.net | Web: http://www.kambach.net | | Geschäftsführer: Patrick Kambach | Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, HRB 60009 | Ust-IdNr.: DE815028832, Steuernummer: 106/5736/0037 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFKPxpeCIR+kawbQF0RAoxhAKDJrSV4NkUGmM9FJgeAsbeyJH7XWACdG+qp mO21ll8ODhmSUWw3nHccxig= =y/lH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
At 07:45 AM 22-06-09 +0200, Patrick Kambach wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
hi Hank,
yes, the response time listed in the graph are not "accurate". Regarding the "moves" from LIR to LIR I got the following reply on my own request:
- --- We did not forget about your request. We are currently drafting a procedure document for this process which will become publicly available soon. As soon as the procedure has been published we will move the resources in question from de.xxxxx over to de.connectingbytes as requested. - ---
So I guess it will just take some time. That it didn't come into the RIPE's mind, that *some* LIR's will have to move some PI / ASN is "strange" ;)
They did consider it as detailed in section B of Impact of Policy on RIPE NCC Operations/Services inside: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-01.html I guess from Aug 2008 till now hasn't been enough time for RIPE NCC to get up to speed on this. Nonetheless, that doesn't excuse their "altering" their response time stats to show stellar response time. -Hank
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi Hank, yes, the response time listed in the graph are not "accurate". Regarding the "moves" from LIR to LIR I got the following reply on my own request: - --- We did not forget about your request. We are currently drafting a procedure document for this process which will become publicly available soon. As soon as the procedure has been published we will move the resources in question from de.xxxxx over to de.connectingbytes as requested. - --- So I guess it will just take some time. That it didn't come into the RIPE's mind, that *some* LIR's will have to move some PI / ASN is "strange" ;) Cheers, Patrick Am 22.06.2009 06:45, schrieb Hank Nussbacher:
Judging by the RIPE statistics posted in regards to hostmaster response time everything is great: http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/rs/rt-hostmaster.html
For the last 2 weeks response time is less than 1 day.
Well due to the "2007-01 Phase 2 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC", I have been submitting tickets to move ASNs assigned to my LIR over a decade ago to other LIRs which are now the owner of that ASN (yet now is billed to my LIR).
So starting on June 16 - 6 days ago I submitted 6 "move requests" and even got back ticket acknowledgments: 2009063188, 2009063190, etc. and yesterday a 7th request. Yet, I have not heard back from RIPE NCC.
Yet, the stats graphs shows all ticket requests answered within 1 day.
Is it just me?!
-Hank
- -- ConnectingBytes GmbH - "www.kambach.net" | In der Steele 35, 40599 Düsseldorf, Germany | Telefon: 0800 / 900 2580 - 1, Fax: 0800 / 900 2580 - 2 | Email: pkambach@kambach.net | Web: http://www.kambach.net | | Geschäftsführer: Patrick Kambach | Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, HRB 60009 | Ust-IdNr.: DE815028832, Steuernummer: 106/5736/0037 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFKPxpeCIR+kawbQF0RAoxhAKDJrSV4NkUGmM9FJgeAsbeyJH7XWACdG+qp mO21ll8ODhmSUWw3nHccxig= =y/lH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 22 Jun 2009, at 06:45, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Judging by the RIPE statistics posted in regards to hostmaster response time everything is great: http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/rs/rt-hostmaster.html
For the last 2 weeks response time is less than 1 day.
I think that relates to the speed at which your auto response was despatched :( J Regards, Jon Morby FidoNet Registration Services Ltd web: www.fido.net tel: +44 (0) 845 004 3050 fax: +44 (0) 845 004 3051
Jon Morby wrote:
On 22 Jun 2009, at 06:45, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Judging by the RIPE statistics posted in regards to hostmaster response time everything is great: http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/rs/rt-hostmaster.html
For the last 2 weeks response time is less than 1 day.
I think that relates to the speed at which your auto response was despatched :(
No it relates to hostmaster related requests and their response. They actually respond within 1-2 days in general to requests. Doesn't mean that your issue is solved then. Kind regards, Martin List-Petersen -- Airwire - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair http://www.airwire.ie Phone: 091-865 968
On 22 Jun 2009, at 06:45, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Judging by the RIPE statistics posted in regards to hostmaster response time everything is great: http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/rs/rt-hostmaster.html
For the last 2 weeks response time is less than 1 day.
I think that relates to the speed at which your auto response was despatched :( J Regards, Jon Morby FidoNet Registration Services Ltd web: www.fido.net tel: +44 (0) 845 004 3050 fax: +44 (0) 845 004 3051
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Hank, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Judging by the RIPE statistics posted in regards to hostmaster response time everything is great: http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/rs/rt-hostmaster.html
For the last 2 weeks response time is less than 1 day.
Well due to the "2007-01 Phase 2 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC", I have been submitting tickets to move ASNs assigned to my LIR over a decade ago to other LIRs which are now the owner of that ASN (yet now is billed to my LIR).
So starting on June 16 - 6 days ago I submitted 6 "move requests" and even got back ticket acknowledgments: 2009063188, 2009063190, etc. and yesterday a 7th request. Yet, I have not heard back from RIPE NCC.
Yet, the stats graphs shows all ticket requests answered within 1 day.
In order not to disrupt day-to-day operations like resource requests, which have the highest priority, we have created a separate ticket queue with lower priority for End User contracts. We have mentioned this at http://www.ripe.net/rs/pi-existing-assignments.html. We will take your feedback into account and add more information on the statistics page and acknowledgments sent to the LIR. With regards to the billing of resources, Up to September, LIRs can indicate which resources should stay with their LIR and which not. If in the interface provided through the LIR Portal you select 'Not My End User', you will not be billed for the specific resource in 2010. Move requests are taken into account but will be handled over a longer period of time. I hope this clarifies, however if you have any further questions or feedback don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Andrea Cima RIPE NCC
Is it just me?!
-Hank
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAko/VPwACgkQXOgsmPkFrjMsRwCgjVZvVmi20qf9n+qOMC01tCtn JCAAn2BbgKOij34nxLfi5jIGCH1k9NZ4 =6lAN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (5)
-
Andrea Cima -
Hank Nussbacher -
Jon Morby -
Martin List-Petersen -
Patrick Kambach